On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 02:09, Marc Haber wrote:
Can anybody name me a package that does a conffile conversion in the
maintainer scripts, and does a decent job? I desparately need to steal
some code ;)
I believe netbase does.
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 23:19, Drew Parsons wrote:
Why does policy ask us to strip binaries anyway? Is it merely to reduce
storage and bandwidth costs?
Right. I think there will be a point in the future (probably 2-3 years
away at least though) though where we can just default to shipping
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 23:19, Drew Parsons wrote:
Why does policy ask us to strip binaries anyway? Is it merely to reduce
storage and bandwidth costs?
Right. I think there will be a point in the future (probably 2-3 years
away at least though) though where we can just default to shipping
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 19:34, Sam Powers wrote:
Is it a good idea to keep a debian directory upstream? I have CVS access,
so I think it'd make it easier for me, and also for others who want to
build custom debs, if the debian files were in CVS.
I think the best solution is to keep it in CVS,
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 19:34, Sam Powers wrote:
Is it a good idea to keep a debian directory upstream? I have CVS access,
so I think it'd make it easier for me, and also for others who want to
build custom debs, if the debian files were in CVS.
I think the best solution is to keep it in CVS,
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 00:18, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
I am trying to make apt always run debsums_gen on the just-installed
packages.
You may want to try my dpkg patch in bug #155676; it will at least be
faster. I hope it will be in dpkg proper soon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 00:18, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
I am trying to make apt always run debsums_gen on the just-installed
packages.
You may want to try my dpkg patch in bug #155676; it will at least be
faster. I hope it will be in dpkg proper soon.
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 21:33, Indra Kusuma wrote:
On 7 Aug 2002, Colin Walters wrote:
# I much prefer to sponsor people who have at least had their key signed
# by a developer. Have you seen the keysigning coordination page?
#
# http://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php
what about my country
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 21:01, John Belmonte wrote:
Thanks, I appreciate it.
I didn't find any problems in your packages; they look good.
OK, I've sent an email off to the maintainer.
I think a week or so should be fair.
That's understandable. About three weeks ago I tried to contact the
On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 12:07, John Belmonte wrote:
I've packaged libxmlsec (bug #152605), a library for performing
signature and encryption operations on XML [...]
Cool.
and am looking for a sponsor.
I am looking over your packages now.
The required version of libxslt1 wasn't available
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 09:37, Andrew Suffield wrote:
If the developers of limewire want to force people to view the ads,
they must write this into the license (and we punt it to non-free),
otherwise it is completely futile to try and make people do so.
Less confrontationally, you might point
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 09:37, Andrew Suffield wrote:
If the developers of limewire want to force people to view the ads,
they must write this into the license (and we punt it to non-free),
otherwise it is completely futile to try and make people do so.
Less confrontationally, you might point
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 13:11, Michael Furr wrote:
err, guess a link to the packages would help:
deb http://userpages.umbc.edu/~fu1/debian unstable main
deb-src http://userpages.umbc.edu/~fu1/debian unstable main
I took a quick look at your packages; the first thing I noticed is that
your
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 09:58, Rick Younie wrote:
conserver is non-free so the autobuild system doesn't know
about it. I'm not sure all autobuild admins bother with
non-free, for philosophical reasons, so you should look into
building it yourself on each arch yourself if you can.
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 09:58, Rick Younie wrote:
conserver is non-free so the autobuild system doesn't know
about it. I'm not sure all autobuild admins bother with
non-free, for philosophical reasons, so you should look into
building it yourself on each arch yourself if you can.
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 10:36, Ari Pollak wrote:
Yeah, I am registered as a New Maintainer, but the process takes a while
and I've been on Waiting for DAM to approve blah blah for more than a
month now. I'm registered under [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've uploaded
updated packages which close the ITP
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 21:53, Ari Pollak wrote:
Ack, woops. It should be up there now.
Ok, I got a chance to look at your package; it looks good to me. I will
be happy to sponsor you.
I see your GPG key is already signed by a Debian Developer; that's a
good sign.
You should file an ITP bug
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 17:24, Ari Pollak wrote:
Looking at
configure.ac, it really only requires GTK+2 and pspell, so I just added
libgtk2.0-dev to the build-depends.
Hm, but it still appears to need libpspell-dev, which isn't in the
Build-Depends. If it's left out, my pbuilder build dies
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 19:40, Ari Pollak wrote:
The packages can be found at http://www.ebnj.net/debian/unstable.
Suggestions welcome.
Hmm..the .orig.tar.gz seems to be missing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 19:40, Ari Pollak wrote:
The packages can be found at http://www.ebnj.net/debian/unstable.
Suggestions welcome.
Hmm..the .orig.tar.gz seems to be missing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 08:31, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 11:58:39PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
I just uploaded a new version of libwww 5.4.0 to fix #151894 and the
build failed on sparc and ia64 with really bizarre symptoms.
I now found out that the build fails on
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 08:31, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 11:58:39PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
I just uploaded a new version of libwww 5.4.0 to fix #151894 and the
build failed on sparc and ia64 with really bizarre symptoms.
I now found out that the build fails on
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 15:41, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 02:06:13PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
I put the xml-resume-library's .xsl files in
/usr/share/sgml/xml-resume-library/xsl.
Maybe a better place is /usr/share/xml-resume-library/xsl, though. Any
other
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 18:55, Eric Gentilini wrote:
Hi all,
I m starting to package a few things and wondered where .xsl files should go ?
These files, in the context I use them, are used to produce different outputs
used externally to the program. There are also ways to produce this output
On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 15:47, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
I didn't know that swing (or basically any GUI) stuff worked with a
JVM in main.
You can definitely program GUIs using Java and JVMs in main. See for
example:
http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/
and
http://gnome-gcj.sourceforge.net/
On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 11:41, Chris AtLee wrote:
Hi there,
I've written a small program that I'd like to package and have included
in the debian archive. It's a gnome applet that allows you to set
alarms and then be notified when those alarms go off.
Have you looked at sanduhr?
--
To
On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 11:41, Chris AtLee wrote:
Hi there,
I've written a small program that I'd like to package and have included
in the debian archive. It's a gnome applet that allows you to set
alarms and then be notified when those alarms go off.
Have you looked at sanduhr?
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 20:50, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
I had a look on popularity contest and that said it had 7 recent users.
You have to keep in mind that the popularity-contest is almost certainly
not a representative sample of our users. So it is likely that more
than 7 people use it.
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 20:50, Corrin Lakeland wrote:
I had a look on popularity contest and that said it had 7 recent users.
You have to keep in mind that the popularity-contest is almost certainly
not a representative sample of our users. So it is likely that more
than 7 people use it.
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 08:18, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
So I reupload the package _including .orig.tar.gz_ and I received some
mails like the following, what I have to do?
This won't directly solve your problem, but I strongly suggest running
dinstall -n on your changes file after you upload.
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 08:18, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
So I reupload the package _including .orig.tar.gz_ and I received some
mails like the following, what I have to do?
This won't directly solve your problem, but I strongly suggest running
dinstall -n on your changes file after you upload.
Bryan-TheBS-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As such, this is going to be almost an AOL-level help request.
I'm very sorry for this. All I'm looking for is a little direction,
and I'll RTFM the rest. I've gone through much of the FAQ,
Developer's Reference and New Maintainer's Guide, and I'm
Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am the author and packager of apt-howto, as soon as it was
translated into english from portuguese, I packaged it and added it
to the DDP, I was adviced, on the -devel list to just create one
package: apt-howto with all the translations of the
Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since I make my last dist-upgrade (friday) my package komba2 doesn't
compile
[...]
cd . automake --foreign --include-deps ./Makefile
./Makefile.am:5: EXTRA_DIST multiply defined in condition TRUE
This is probably because your package is
Jean-Michel Kelbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since I make my last dist-upgrade (friday) my package komba2 doesn't
compile
[...]
cd . automake --foreign --include-deps ./Makefile
./Makefile.am:5: EXTRA_DIST multiply defined in condition TRUE
This is probably because your package is
Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, i think the basic principle is split everything that people
might want to install independantly or that can be upgraded
independantly
Mmmm...I'd rather go for a basic principle of Use as few packages as
possible, but no fewer. There's no need
Erich Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, i think the basic principle is split everything that people
might want to install independantly or that can be upgraded
independantly
Mmmm...I'd rather go for a basic principle of Use as few packages as
possible, but no fewer. There's no need to
Salvador Abreu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
10:41:58$ dinstall -n gprolog_1.2.7-1_i386.changes
Traceback (innermost last):
File /org/ftp.debian.org/katie/katie, line 1425, in ?
main()
File /org/ftp.debian.org/katie/katie, line 1361, in main
projectB = pg.connect(Cnf[DB::Name],
Salvador Abreu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
10:41:58$ dinstall -n gprolog_1.2.7-1_i386.changes
Traceback (innermost last):
File /org/ftp.debian.org/katie/katie, line 1425, in ?
main()
File /org/ftp.debian.org/katie/katie, line 1361, in main
projectB = pg.connect(Cnf[DB::Name],
Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You could try piping the files through
sed 's|changelog/index\.html|changelog.html.gz|g'
while installing...
Eek. I feared someone was going to suggest that. It seems like too
much of a hack to me.
No, that would completely defeat the point of
Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You could try piping the files through
sed 's|changelog/index\.html|changelog.html.gz|g'
while installing...
Eek. I feared someone was going to suggest that. It seems like too
much of a hack to me.
No, that would completely defeat the point of
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Convert it to text. Include the html changelog if it makes sense,
but make changelog.gz be the text version.
Right, I am currently converting it to text and including that. But
my problem is that policy says specifically that the HTML changelog
should be
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Convert it to text. Include the html changelog if it makes sense,
but make changelog.gz be the text version.
Right, I am currently converting it to text and including that. But
my problem is that policy says specifically that the HTML changelog
should be
I'm currently in the process of making a package for the XML Resume
Library:
URL:http://xmlresume.sourceforge.net
My current package is at:
URL:http://monk.verbum.org/~walters/debian/experimental
I have two problems with it. First, lintian complains:
E: xml-resume-library:
I'm currently in the process of making a package for the XML Resume
Library:
URL:http://xmlresume.sourceforge.net
My current package is at:
URL:http://monk.verbum.org/~walters/debian/experimental
I have two problems with it. First, lintian complains:
E: xml-resume-library:
William [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The first thing that I did was to use dpkg-deb. My first question
is, what are control/changelog files and how would I create one?
Everytime I try to package something, it tries to locate
'debian/control' or 'debian/changelog'. The only thing that seems
to
Jimmy Kaplowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is probably a standard and not-too-difficult way to
selectively add the Mail-Followup-To: header to such a configurable
system as any incarnation of Emacs. I wish I could provide a way,
but I can't.
I mailed this privately to Tollef, but since
Jimmy Kaplowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is probably a standard and not-too-difficult way to
selectively add the Mail-Followup-To: header to such a configurable
system as any incarnation of Emacs. I wish I could provide a way,
but I can't.
I mailed this privately to Tollef, but since
Peter Kruppa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to make a debian package of our php-based application, so
it can be easily installed on a debian system. But I have a
problem, it seems that you have to have at least 1 main binary in
the package (is that true?)
I don't think so. There are a
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package of gpmudmon;
walters@space-ghost:~$ dpkg -s gpmudmon-applet
Package: gpmudmon-applet
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: misc
Installed-Size: 152
Maintainer: Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 0.1.1-3
Depends: pmud, gdk
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package of gpmudmon;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -s gpmudmon-applet
Package: gpmudmon-applet
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: misc
Installed-Size: 152
Maintainer: Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Version: 0.1.1-3
Depends: pmud, gdk
51 matches
Mail list logo
