Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-16 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 16/06/2016 à 16:39, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi, > > >> # CC=gcc-6 \> #CPP=cpp-6 >> # >> # RICHARD, IS IT CORRECT ? > > nope :) > > anyway, I did > create a chroot with the build dependencies > check if the library was not installed (the one you didn't like) > git cl

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-16 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 16/06/2016 à 16:39, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi, > > >> # CC=gcc-6 \> #CPP=cpp-6 >> # >> # RICHARD, IS IT CORRECT ? > > nope :) > > anyway, I did > create a chroot with the build dependencies > check if the library was not installed (the one you didn't like) > git cl

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-16 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 16/06/2016 à 10:37, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi, > >> As far as I know, the plan is to switch to gcc-6 by default for stretch: >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2016/01/msg00100.html >> so while identifying and backporting the fix to gcc-5 would be nice, I'd >> recommend not putt

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-16 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 16/06/2016 à 10:37, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi, > >> As far as I know, the plan is to switch to gcc-6 by default for stretch: >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2016/01/msg00100.html >> so while identifying and backporting the fix to gcc-5 would be nice, I'd >> recommend not putt

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-15 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 15/06/2016 à 23:20, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : > > On 15/06/16 20:54, Eric Heintzmann wrote: >> How can we debug with upstream, without any access to a 390x machine ? > > You can ask for an access to Debian Porter machine: > https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi > https://ds

Bug#827383: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-2 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method

2016-06-15 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 15/06/2016 à 23:12, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : > Hello Eric, > > On 15/06/16 20:57, Eric Heintzmann wrote: > > > > Le 15/06/2016 à 16:41, Jerome Benoit a écrit : > >> Package: sponsorship-requests > >> Severity: serious > >> Justification: fails t

Bug#827383: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.1+ds-2 [RC] -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method

2016-06-15 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 15/06/2016 à 16:41, Jerome Benoit a écrit : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > Dear Sponsors, > > I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package gmp-ecm [1], a > mathematical packa

Re: how to build packages with a specific complier ?

2016-06-15 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 15/06/2016 à 14:16, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi, > >> It appears that some tests fail for one of my package (gmp-ecm) on one >> architecture (s390x): >> after some investigation, it appears that it is a compiler issue: building >> with gcc-6 (instead of gcc-5) >> causes no issue. So

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-18 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Hi Gianfranco, Le 16/05/2016 15:16, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi Eric, > > nice indeed, so please wait some more time, and ping me back in 7-15 days if > nobody > picked up the work in the meanwhile. > > Iain R. Learmonth has uploaded gnustep-make. Thanks to you for helping me to improv

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-17 Thread Eric Heintzmann
oops ! accidentally removed gsdh_gnustep symlinks ! Fixed and reuploaded add this line to changelog * Provide a new debian/gnustep-make.links. https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnustep-make or dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-make/gnustep-make_2.6.8-1.dsc

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-17 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Hi Le 17/05/2016 11:52, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > > > Depends: gnustep-common (>= ${source:Version}), > gnustep-common (<< ${source:Version}.1~), > gobjc, > -autotools-dev, > ${misc:Depends}, > -${gnustep:Depends} > +${perl:Depends} > +Replaces: gnustep-common (<< 2

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-17 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 17/05/2016 19:27, Eric Heintzmann a écrit : > Hi, > Reuploaded ! https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnustep-make or dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-make/gnustep-make_2.6.8-1.dsc Updated changelog: gnustep-make (2.6.8-1) unstable; urgency=low

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-17 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Hi, Reuploaded ! Le 17/05/2016 18:58, Eric Heintzmann a écrit : > > > Le 17/05/2016 11:52, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : >> Hi, >>> switch to autoreconf done >> >> nice! >> >> little nitpick before answering to the open points: >> * debi

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-17 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 17/05/2016 11:52, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi, >> switch to autoreconf done > > > nice! > > little nitpick before answering to the open points: > * debian/patches/manpage-spelling-errors.patch: New, fix two spelling > + > errors. > > > there is a new space in changelog > (pull-debian-

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-16 Thread Eric Heintzmann
* Provide a new debian/gnustep-common.links file. * Provide a new debian/gnustep-common.lintian-overrides file. * Move gnustep-config.1 manpage to gnustep-make package: gnustep-make now Replaces: and Breaks gnustep-common (<<2.6.8-1). -- Eric Heintzmann Tue, 03 May 2016 22:13:30 +0200

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-16 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Hi Gianfranco, Le 16/05/2016 21:15, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi Eric, > > >> I think there are too many changes in this release. >> Is it okay to remove autoreconf for now, >> and replace autotools-dev by autoreconf at next release ? > > it is, just a side note: I never had issues with th

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-16 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 16/05/2016 15:16, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > Hi Eric, > > > >> Well autotools-dev already used. No changes here. >> About autoreconf, I'm not familiar with it. >> I installed it to test it. Since all seems ok, I've not removed it. > > https://wiki.debian.org/Autoreconf > > I was talking

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-16 Thread Eric Heintzmann
>> also, the control.in file removal is not documented I guess > Yes, this is a consequence of the debian/rules rewriting. I mean I've removed control target in debian/rules file, thus I removed control.in which was not needed any longer. Thanks Eric

Bug#824262: Fwd: Re: gnustep-make ack

2016-05-16 Thread Eric Heintzmann
ch> Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 13:52:11 +0200 References: <5739ae33.40...@free.fr> In-Reply-To:<5739ae33.40...@free.fr> To: Eric Heintzmann X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13F68) Hi eric I am glad if you do so, thank you! Gürkan > On May 16, 2016, at 13:25, Eric Heintzm

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-16 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 16/05/2016 12:40, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit : > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Eric, some questions on the changes: > 1) why do you need both autotools-dev and autoreconf? Well autotools-dev already used. No changes here. About autoreconf, I'm not familiar with it. I installed it to test

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-14 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 15/05/2016 03:26, Adam Borowski a écrit : > On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 03:04:37AM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote: >> Le 15/05/2016 02:46, Adam Borowski a écrit : >>> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote: >>>> I am looking for a sponso

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-14 Thread Eric Heintzmann
Le 15/05/2016 02:46, Adam Borowski a écrit : > Hi! > > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-make" >> >> * Package name: gnustep-make >>Version

Bug#824262: RFS: gnustep-make/2.6.8-1 [RC] -- GNUstep build system

2016-05-14 Thread Eric Heintzmann
vide a new debian/gnustep-common.manpages file. * Provide a new debian/gnustep-common.docs file. * Move gnustep-config.1 manpage to gnustep-make package: gnustep-make now Replaces: gnustep-common (<< 2.6.8-1). Regards, Eric Heintzmann

Bug#823249: RFS: camera.app/0.8.0-10 [RC] -- GNUstep application for digital still cameras

2016-05-02 Thread Eric Heintzmann
debian/install file, - use dh_symlink and dpkg-maintainer-script (and thus add dependency to dpkg (>= 1.17.4)) to create symlink from old to new locations. (provide new camera.app.links and new camera.app.maintscript files). Regards, Eric Heintzmann