Re: Renaming a package

? I think Provides: doesn't act like Package: so APT doesn't understand that emacs-goodies-extra-el has to be replaced by emacs-goodies-el. Such a situation may change with (upcoming?) versioned provides. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Renaming a package

the need for dummy packages. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Renaming a package

? I think Provides: doesn't act like Package: so APT doesn't understand that emacs-goodies-extra-el has to be replaced by emacs-goodies-el. Such a situation may change with (upcoming?) versioned provides. -- Jérôme Marant

Re: Renaming a package

the need for dummy packages. -- Jérôme Marant

Re: xemacs specific .el

going to have a look at this. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: xemacs specific .el

going to have a look at this. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant

Re: GNAT 3.15p

Quoting Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please write to Florian Weimer first. He already did the job, so it's up to him to decide if he wants him packages to enter the archives rather than yours. I'm not a DD, so I have no word on this issue

Re: GNAT 3.15p

Quoting Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please write to Florian Weimer first. He already did the job, so it's up to him to decide if he wants him packages to enter the archives rather than yours. I'm not a DD, so I have no word on this issue

Re: GNAT 3.15p

to him to decide if he wants him packages to enter the archives rather than yours. -- Jérôme Marant

How do you upload/build sponsored packages?

: Sponsoree [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sponsoree [EMAIL PROTECTED] How is this possible? Thanks. -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marant.org

Re: How do you upload/build sponsored packages?

afterwards when I've checked that the build looks sane). Thanks. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org

Re: How do you upload/build sponsored packages?

without signing (debuild/dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us) and sign afterwards with debsign. (Both debsign -m'My Name [EMAIL PROTECTED]' and debsign -kyourkeyid are ok.) Thanks. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org

Re: How to obtain current package version number?

bad overkill. Does a maintainer script know the package version, so that it can write the version number to a file? IIRC you can get it from the postinst parameters. You can have a look to the policy, in maintainers scripts section. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: How to obtain current package version number?

dpkg is actually the recommended way to do this? Can I call dpkg --list from a postinst script without having it explode? No, it is not. You just need to use the $1 argument to postinst, as Jerome told you. IIRC, it is $2. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: duplicate-conffile error ???

for this. Does anyone have an idea of where this is coming from ? Debhelp automaticaly adds every /etc file to conffile. So, remove this entry from ocaml-base-3.06-1.conffiles. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org

Re: duplicate-conffile error ???

, and debhelper will feed a completely new one. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org

Re: Getting non-free packages built on all arches

En réponse à Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:07:03PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: Hi, Non-free packages don't seem to be autobuilt. Do I have to contact every autobuilder maintainer in order to get a non-free package built on every architecture

Getting non-free packages built on all arches

Hi, Non-free packages don't seem to be autobuilt. Do I have to contact every autobuilder maintainer in order to get a non-free package built on every architecture? Thanks. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org

Re: How to include a binary file

Karolina Lindqvist wrote: How do I include a binary file like a .png file in the diff? I need to include a PNG file with the application icon, which is not supplied in the upstreams tar. You have to include it uuencoded. Then, you uudecode it from debian/rules and install it in its proper

Re: How to include a binary file

Karolina Lindqvist wrote: How do I include a binary file like a .png file in the diff? I need to include a PNG file with the application icon, which is not supplied in the upstreams tar. You have to include it uuencoded. Then, you uudecode it from debian/rules and install it in its proper

Re: FYI: GNAT 3.15p has been released

Jon Ward wrote: On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:47:35PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote: This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released. I think that it is far more stable that the version from GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders. I recall that some people were

Re: FYI: GNAT 3.15p has been released

Jon Ward wrote: On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 08:47:35PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote: This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released. I think that it is far more stable that the version from GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders. I recall that some people were

FYI: GNAT 3.15p has been released

Hi, This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released. I think that it is far more stable that the version from GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders. I recall that some people were interested in taking it over. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http

FYI: GNAT 3.15p has been released

Hi, This is just a reminder that GNAT 3.15p has been released. I think that it is far more stable that the version from GCC so it would be nice to make it available to Ada coders. I recall that some people were interested in taking it over. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http

Re: GNAT

[Please no CC on reply, I'm subscribed to the list] Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: What about ACT not fixing bugs in the GNAT public releases? They do fix them, but they have extremely long release cycles. Would it be that hard

Re: GNAT

[Please no CC on reply, I'm subscribed to the list] Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: What about ACT not fixing bugs in the GNAT public releases? They do fix them, but they have extremely long release cycles. Would it be that hard

Re: GNAT

me wrong) Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GNAT

me wrong) Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org

Re: packages which can be arch: all and arch: any ...

in size, it's probably more important to package them in a comprehensible and simple manner. This is exactly what I think. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: packages which can be arch: all and arch: any ...

in size, it's probably more important to package them in a comprehensible and simple manner. This is exactly what I think. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marant.org

Re: Python scrips and deps

must have Depends: python (=2.2), python (2.3) But I guess that if upstream absolutely want to use a specific Python, there isn't any reason not to leave Depends: python2.2. I don't see any problem here. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Python scrips and deps

-geek :) Let's see who's gonna feel offended by the confusion ;-) -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Python scrips and deps

must have Depends: python (=2.2), python (2.3) But I guess that if upstream absolutely want to use a specific Python, there isn't any reason not to leave Depends: python2.2. I don't see any problem here. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant

Re: Python scrips and deps

-geek :) Let's see who's gonna feel offended by the confusion ;-) -- Jérôme Marant

Re: dpkg's treatment of symlinks

. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dpkg's treatment of symlinks

. -- Jérôme Marant

Re: dpkg's treatment of symlinks

://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200107/msg01666.html 2. What do I have to do in order to prevent it from doing it? See icewm package (maintainer scripts). Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe

Re: dpkg's treatment of symlinks

://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200107/msg01666.html 2. What do I have to do in order to prevent it from doing it? See icewm package (maintainer scripts). Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org

Re: mldonkey needs sponsor

Jérôme Marant wrote: Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you didn't. Before getting offensive read the mldonkey-mailing lists yourself. Goswin, Please accept my apologies for being offensive

Re: mldonkey needs sponsor

a look at the package, good comments are allways appreciated. It is going to non-free right ? -- Jérôme Marant

Re: mldonkey needs sponsor

should definitely go to non-free or the edonkey support should be removed. Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you didn't. -- Jérôme Marant

Re: mldonkey needs sponsor

Jérôme Marant wrote: Goswin, why didn't you get any clue? Did you read the thread in the WNPP RFP bug? Did you read mldonkey-archives? I think you didn't. Before getting offensive read the mldonkey-mailing lists yourself. Goswin, Please accept my apologies for being offensive

Re: chained dependencies handling in debian/control

-- to let it depend only on B? In the case at hand: A = python2.1-xml B = python2.1-xmlbase C = python2.1 Yes, you must specify them explicitely, because there is no transitivity in the package system. You must think of B and C as independant packages need by A. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant

Re: chained dependencies handling in debian/control

-- to let it depend only on B? In the case at hand: A = python2.1-xml B = python2.1-xmlbase C = python2.1 Yes, you must specify them explicitely, because there is no transitivity in the package system. You must think of B and C as independant packages need by A. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship

currently. So, I want the sponsorship managed through the BTS. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:49:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:11:20PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: I have a recent case of someone who NMU'ed packages of someone I do sponsor but I wasn't aware of that. For things like that the PTS is probably the way to go

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:21:11PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Jérôme Marant | On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | | So, even though you might know stuff about sponsorship, you do not own | the term. What I (and it seems a lot of other people) think

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship

currently. So, I want the sponsorship managed through the BTS. -- Jérôme Marant

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:49:29PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:11:20PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: I have a recent case of someone who NMU'ed packages of someone I do sponsor but I wasn't aware of that. For things like that the PTS is probably the way to go

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:21:11PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: * Jérôme Marant | On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | | So, even though you might know stuff about sponsorship, you do not own | the term. What I (and it seems a lot of other people) think

How to make a package version different from the source version?

this? Thanks in advance. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

How to make a package version different from the source version?

this? Thanks in advance. -- Jérôme Marant

Re: Debconf questions and purge

with the remove option. I only have to hope that the user will never purge the package. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debconf questions and purge

with the remove option. I only have to hope that the user will never purge the package. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org

Re: Debconf questions and purge

Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jérôme Marant wrote: I need to merge the wwsympa package into sympa. Both packages use debconf. I wonder how I should merge wwsympa debconf templates into sympa's. In sympa, debconf variables start with sympa/ and wwsympa ones start

Re: Debconf questions and purge

. It is ok with remove. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org

Re: Debconf questions and purge

Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jérôme Marant wrote: I need to merge the wwsympa package into sympa. Both packages use debconf. I wonder how I should merge wwsympa debconf templates into sympa's. In sympa, debconf variables start with sympa/ and wwsympa ones start with wwsympa

Re: libpng and the autobuilders

to have missed the bottom line. How do I remedy this? Replace libpng-dev with libpng3-dev. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libpng and the autobuilders

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:50:56AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 09:26, Jérôme Marant wrote: Replace libpng-dev with libpng3-dev. How would that help things? It seems to me that from the log, the problem isn't my build-dep, but rather that libpng3 is not going

Re: libpng and the autobuilders

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:50:56AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 09:26, Jérôme Marant wrote: Replace libpng-dev with libpng3-dev. How would that help things? It seems to me that from the log, the problem isn't my build-dep, but rather that libpng3 is not going

Re: renaming a package

, and a Provides: can't satisfy versioned dependencies. Are there any plans to fix dpkg so it finally supports versioned provides ? AFAIK, there is a partial patch in dpkg CVS. APT needs to be modified in order to handle versioned provides as well. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: renaming a package

are versioned, and a Provides: can't satisfy versioned dependencies. Are there any plans to fix dpkg so it finally supports versioned provides ? AFAIK, there is a partial patch in dpkg CVS. APT needs to be modified in order to handle versioned provides as well. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant

Re: SGML catalogs

such a registration mechanism, but with XML catalog. There might not be a lot of differences. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SGML catalogs

On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Alexandre wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:32:01AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:06:36AM +0200, Alexandre wrote: Should the postinst scripts use udpate-catalog or install-sgmlcatalog to register new catalog entries

Re: SGML catalogs

such a registration mechanism, but with XML catalog. There might not be a lot of differences. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SGML catalogs

On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Alexandre wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:32:01AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:06:36AM +0200, Alexandre wrote: Should the postinst scripts use udpate-catalog or install-sgmlcatalog to register new catalog entries

Re: lib sdl

Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work means. In another mail, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So what? The one who uploads the first wins. [...] Obtaining permission

Re: lib sdl

problems, so don't try to package unmaintained pieces of software. Yes, you _should_, not you _must_. Please read it more carefully next time. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lib sdl

problems, so don't try to package unmaintained pieces of software. Yes, you _should_, not you _must_. Please read it more carefully next time. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: lib sdl

On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 02:25:35PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote: It seems you have different ideas; I am not losing my sleep on this. Don't worry, I know who I'm talking to ;-) -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: lib sdl

in Depends and Build-depends fields. Sorry, but I don't really understand why you are working on reinventing packaging that has already been done by Christian Marillat at http://marillat.free.fr. You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work means. -- Jérôme Marant http

Re: lib sdl

in Depends and Build-depends fields. Sorry, but I don't really understand why you are working on reinventing packaging that has already been done by Christian Marillat at http://marillat.free.fr. You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work means. -- Jérôme Marant http

Re: package uploaded by my sponsor

. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: shared __init__.py file accross multiple python packages

? Are the modules you're packaging part of the same source or are they independant ? -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: shared __init__.py file accross multiple python packages

On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 03:43:58PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 03:21:04PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Are the modules you're packaging part of the same source or are they independant ? They are independand. These are modules developed by my company, and our

Re: shared __init__.py file accross multiple python packages

On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:46:43PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:30:14PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 03:43:58PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 03:21:04PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Are the modules you're packaging

Re: shared __init__.py file accross multiple python packages

? Are the modules you're packaging part of the same source or are they independant ? -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: shared __init__.py file accross multiple python packages

On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 03:43:58PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 03:21:04PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Are the modules you're packaging part of the same source or are they independant ? They are independand. These are modules developed by my company, and our

Re: binary addition in the debian .diff.gz

(so add a build dependency on sharutils) and uudecode through debian/rules. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: binary addition in the debian .diff.gz

sum) whenever possible. The diff file is dedicated to debian packaging specifics. That's why changing the diff only is a better packaging practice. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: binary addition in the debian .diff.gz

Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Jérôme Marant wrote: The only way to do it is to uuencode the binary data (so add a build dependency on sharutils) and uudecode through debian/rules. Note you can also use pack (and unpack) u in perl and thereby avoid

Re: binary addition in the debian .diff.gz

(so add a build dependency on sharutils) and uudecode through debian/rules. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant

Re: binary addition in the debian .diff.gz

sum) whenever possible. The diff file is dedicated to debian packaging specifics. That's why changing the diff only is a better packaging practice. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant

Re: binary addition in the debian .diff.gz

Jaldhar H. Vyas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Jérôme Marant wrote: The only way to do it is to uuencode the binary data (so add a build dependency on sharutils) and uudecode through debian/rules. Note you can also use pack (and unpack) u in perl and thereby avoid

Re: Rebuilding successfully built arches

to clean up things on his own first though. OK, I'll wait some time and upload again. Or what about a Build-Conflicts: with debhelper 3.4.9 ? Why not ? Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.4.9) -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Re: Rebuilding successfully built arches

to clean up things on his own first though. OK, I'll wait some time and upload again. Or what about a Build-Conflicts: with debhelper 3.4.9 ? Why not ? Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.4.9) -- Jérôme Marant

Re: upstream numbering scheme debian compliant ?

, because this is bad practice. If you really want to do this, please ship both the stable version and the beta version. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: upstream numbering scheme debian compliant ?

gphoto2 instead of gphoto since 2.0 is out ? -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: upstream numbering scheme debian compliant ?

Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:46:19 -0500 christophe barbé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:48:57PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: The current gphoto2 release is 2.0beta5 wich is packaged as 2.0beta5. For the final release 2.0, I

Re: upstream numbering scheme debian compliant ?

, because this is bad practice. If you really want to do this, please ship both the stable version and the beta version. -- Jérôme Marant

Re: upstream numbering scheme debian compliant ?

gphoto2 instead of gphoto since 2.0 is out ? -- Jérôme Marant

Re: upstream numbering scheme debian compliant ?

Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:46:19 -0500 christophe barbé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:48:57PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: The current gphoto2 release is 2.0beta5 wich is packaged as 2.0beta5. For the final release 2.0, I

Re: Moving a package from main to non-US/main

on ftp.debian.org to have the original removed from main. IIRC, it is not non-US/main but simply non-US. Other sections are non-US/contrib and non-US/non-free. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant

Re: broderic@korrnet.org

in the past ? ;-) -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: broderic@korrnet.org

in the past ? ;-) -- Jérôme Marant

Re: some questions about DBS

one, IMHO. FYI, this is the genuine DBS (the one from the package is a modified version). http://master.debian.org/~doogie/dbs_make Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marant.org

Re: backslash in manpages ???

Sven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, ... Hi, Could someone help me out, and tell me either how to correctly escape the \ in man pages or hint me on the correct documentation about it ? You can check the source of the tex manpage which contains backslashes. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant

Re: backslash in manpages ???

Sven [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, ... Hi, Could someone help me out, and tell me either how to correctly escape the \ in man pages or hint me on the correct documentation about it ? You can check the source of the tex manpage which contains backslashes. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant

Re: including full source code in upload

. However, dpkg considers that 2.0beta3 2.0 so you will have to use an epoch to bypass this, i.e. versioning it like 1:2.0. So, i'd advide that you use : gphoto2_1.99-beta3.orig.tar.gz and you won't get the epoch problem. -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: including full source code in upload

Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 2002-01-18 at 09:49, Jérôme Marant wrote: Gergely Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You have to rename the original tarball to gphoto2_2.0beta3.orig.tar.gz. Note: rename, not repack. I would not recommend that you do

  1   2   >