le not ideal, that would be far from the first time distros used
the source code supplied by other distros as a basis for their own
packages.
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
sion 8 of bash, and
so it's name was switched to bashate in order to avoid confusion.
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ease series, and Debian makes a new stable release
something like every 2-2.5 years.
[*] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2021/01/msg2.html
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
if you're packaging it, make sure to generate/include that
AUTHORS file)
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ferred to as a "container") for workload
isolation.
That said, if you're looking to have a Linux VM on a Linux host, UML
probably still works.
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
stream for this and planning to update it to
support Python 3.x in preparation for 2.7 reaching end of life?
--
Jeremy Stanley
eam for this and planning to update it to
support Python 3.x in preparation for 2.7 reaching end of life?
--
Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-07-12 13:45:52 +0900 (+0900), Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
I am blocking on the fact that he uses gnulib in a way that the
version number of his program is expressed only via a Git tag.
Thus, given that Debian source package are based on tar archives,
the version number is lost unless I
On 2013-02-17 21:50:38 +0100 (+0100), Lanoxx wrote:
[...]
Unfortunately I do not have any packaging experience and currently
hardly the time to learn it. I tried it a few times before and it
does not seem to be an easy process. I am therefore looking for a
sponsore to package and upload tilda
On 2013-02-12 13:07:57 -0600 (-0600), Paul Johnson wrote:
[...]
This needs to be vivisected:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o
If none of you use reportbug to adopt packages, there's a lot we could
cut and clean in there.
The references to reportbug up at the top of the
On 2013-02-11 14:45:42 -0600 (-0600), Paul Johnson wrote:
[...]
If I ever do succeed with this, I'm going to come back and start a big
argument with you all. This process is badly designed. If Debian
wants people to maintain packages, why not make adoption simpler? The
package itself is the
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 05:16:48PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
If by new dh rules you mean the use of dh(1) to do everything, only
overriding what is necessary, then those do indeed support completely
arch-independent packages like e.g. http://packages.debian.org/sid/s5 :)
[...]
I updated my
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 07:44:28AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
I think you have misinterpreted my position. Sponsoring is an
introduction to NM and whether or not the maintainer is looking to join
NM has no effect on the quality of packages at the start of sponsoring.
[...]
The problem
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 06:04:36PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
I certainly think that sponsoring is a step towards joining Debian.
[...]
Perhaps not entirely true, though I will accept that I may not be a
typical non-DD maintainer. I have one (very simple) app sponsored
into main for which
. Contents
bzip2 -k Contents
gzip -9 Contents
apt-ftparchive packages . Packages
bzip2 -k Packages
gzip -9c Packages Packages.gz
apt-ftparchive sources . Sources
bzip2 -k Sources
gzip -9c Sources Sources.gz
apt-ftparchive release . Release
rm Packages Sources
gpg --armor --default-key =Jeremy Stanley
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:06:59PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
Nobody says that get-orig-source must be only used for repackaging
purposes. I think it is fine to have such target just getting the
upstream source (ok a hash checking against a previously checked
and trusted version is required)
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:01:43AM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
[...]
Right. These are all good reasons to start hacking around ;-) but now I can
think of some troubles for autobuilder in case of upstream sites not
accesible at the package build time or incomplete/changes downloads being
gzip -9 Contents
apt-ftparchive packages . Packages
bzip2 -k Packages
gzip -9c Packages Packages.gz
apt-ftparchive sources . Sources
bzip2 -k Sources
gzip -9c Sources Sources.gz
apt-ftparchive release . Release
rm Packages Sources
gpg --armor --default-key =Jeremy
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 07:35:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
The reference to /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD is not really correct
since your software is not Copyright The Regents of the University of
California. I'd remove that and just put the full text of the license
into
Version: 1.1-1
Maintainer: Jeremy Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (= 4.1.67), python
Architecture: all
Standards-Version: 3.6.2
Format: 1.0
Priority: extra
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 64
Architecture: all
Depends: python (= 2.3), python
20 matches
Mail list logo
