debian/compat (5).
* Please fetch current versions of config.guess and config.sub before running
configure and remove or restore them in the 'clean' target. The old package
fetched them in the 'clean' target, which is wrong.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
too).
A package can be removed from unstable after someone files an RM bug against
the ftp.debian.org pseudopackage. It will then automatically disappear from
testing, again once no packages in testing depend on it.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
on number, although it's technically part of
the "upstream version". The drawback is that "-" is, somewhat counter-
intuitively, greater than "+".
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
y uploaded e.g. version 1.2-3 of a
package, and then somebody files a bug that the tarball contains some
non-free file, and you'd like to upload 1.2~dfsg-1 to fix it without waiting
for a new upstream release.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
D
ary product, they can read the copyright statements of
the individual files. But there is no guarantee that those are complete, and
*we* certainly can't guarantee that.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On lördagen den 2 maj 2009, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> 2009/5/2 Magnus Holmgren :
> > On torsdagen den 26 mars 2009, Michal Čihař wrote:
> >> Dne Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:21:29 +0100
> >>
> >> Adam Ziaja napsal(a):
> >> > The package appears to be l
ecated
> W: mpview source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.8.1)
Hang on a second. When does mentors.d.n put "The package appears to be lintian
clean" in the RFS template? When lintian reports no errors or warnings, or as
soon as there are no errors?
--
Magnus
nc
> > > giving me this error
> >
> > Any reason you're using sudo instead of -ffakeroot?
>
> No I will use -fakeroot
You don't even need -rfakeroot; dpkg-buildpackage uses fakeroot by default
(since Etch, I think).
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
changes to how packages are built, but it might still be
meaningful to bring it up on -devel, which I've done now.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/, which shows
the translation status for every package. Is there any point nagging the
translation teams also?
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
suppose that these files get changed in the build process.
>
> What is the correct way to get this problem solved?
You can simply
gunzip /usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/dpatch/01_config.dpatch.gz and put it
in debian/patches (and list it in 00list) and it will take care of things.
--
rth it.
You shouldn't be afraid of epochs, but it would be a bit silly if you had to
increment it each time upstream releases a new one-digit minor version, so I
suggest that you try to convince upstream that version strings aren't decimal
numbers and that subsequent releases should b
x27; mail software can automatically fetch
the key, like mine does.
> I also disagree that signed mails are shorter, and you would
> probably that I don't have my secret key at hand any time I post to mailing
> lists.
The body that we see is shorter. Either way it's not a big
and a recommendation by my AM,
* my AM has checked that my PGP key is signed by at least one DD.
therefore I think that everyone who has got to the DAM approval stage should
automatically (or semi-automatically) gain DM status. Earlier steps of the NM
and DM procedures could also be integrated.
--
On söndagen den 27 januari 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 17:27 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > A quick question I dare not ask -devel:
>
> Don't be scared of -devel (it's usually -private or -policy where the
> real flamefests happen). :-)
It
See http://packages.debian.org/sid/libdkim-dev for the resulting mess.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing
number that announce that the package is
> orphaned, but sorry, I can't find it any more in my (huge) mail log.
Did you look at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned ?
You should take ownership of http://bugs.debian.org/24 and
http://bugs.debian.org/25.
--
Magnus Holmgren[E
h_2.0.4-dfsg-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
lose button in the About dialog didn't work.
An updated package has been uploaded to mentors.d.n.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
crabble
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyscrabble/pyscrabble_1.6.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone checked and perhaps even uploaded this package for
me.
Kind regards,
--
Mag
is written by Niels Möller and predates OpenSSH.
The URL of the DSC is:
ftp://ftp.kibibyte.se/debian/pool/main/l/lsh/lsh_2.0.3-1.dsc
For reference, my previous post follows:
On Sunday 27 May 2007 13:27, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Hello, mentors!
>
> Even though I don't really wa
an unqualified address in the From: field,
which your mail server (and mine) qualified with the local domain.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabbl
On Thursday 07 June 2007 00:13, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
> On 6/6/07, Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 6/6/07, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm looking for a sponsor to upload two new versions (unstable and
> &g
ettle-dev as nettle-dev.
* No longer install sexp-conv as an alternative; conflict with lsh-utils
(<< 2.0.3-2, which is anticipated to stop shipping an identical
sexp-conv and depend on nettle-bin instead).
* Link with --as-needed to avoid unnecessary NEEDED tags.
-- Magnus Holmg
is that in your case the other source package is
called "if-transition", so there should be no technical reason stopping you
from renaming your package "weather". Only perhaps that "weather" may be too
generic a name.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 27 May 2007 13:27, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Even though I don't really want to, I'm looking for a mentor to upload the
> new version of lsh that I've prepared.
Oh, and here is the DSC URL:
ftp://ftp.kibibyte.se/debian/pool/main/l/lsh/lsh_2.0.3-1.dsc
--
Magnus H
eview Build-depends: Drop patchutils, dpatch (temporarily),
comerr-dev (redundant), po-debconf (redundant), xutils (makes no
difference); add autotools-dev, scsh-0.6 (as alternative to
guile-1.6).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail ne
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 20:35, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload a new version of nettle, a low level
> cryptographic library. The upload would fix the serious bug #415034.
vorlon took care of this. Thanks.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAI
algorithms for the application to use in any environment and
in any way it needs.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgp5SzAs41VBj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 28 March 2007 18:00, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.03.2007, 17:01 +0200 schrieb Magnus Holmgren:
>
> [manpage creation]
>
> > So what other alternatives are there, not counting help2man and pod2man?
>
> I forgot: gmanedit, manedit
Unfortunate
docs/psdoc. The Makefile there runs $(top_srcdir)/src/gnuplot
ps_symbols.gpi, and my guess is that something goes wrong there.
> http://bugs.debian.org/410565
Seems that you already fixed this, right?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail ne
y real-world use?
> > > I've seen implementations of that on the Internet. I admit that this
> > > is not enough reason to package it though.
>
> There's even one in Postscript. What about packaging it ?
http://bugs.debian.org/185958
http://www.godi
e of your tutorial. There's
nothing about dpatch that makes it particularly better suited for
multi-binary source packages, and nothing in that text is specific to this
kind of packages.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
ut it helps with some "manual" uses.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpEjTBAWJpNz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e. Commonly when you have a multi-binary source package you set
DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp and let "make install" install everything there.
Then you just use dh_install to separate the files into the right packages.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the unneeded, commented-out
debhelper commands. And third, if you put the lists of files to install in
files instead of on the command line, you only need two targets and
debian/rules becomes cleaner (on the other hand, providing a way to build
just a single binary package, just compiling
tive), and if so, follow the
relevant procedure from http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/.
> * If it's not: File an ITP and create a package of that project
> * Ask one of the DDs here to upload your package
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc
manual page was written ... for the
Debian ..." Authors section.
So what other alternatives are there, not counting help2man and pod2man?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpgZArXZObt1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 23 March 2007 20:23, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> I have created a new version of libspf2 and intend to adopt it if I can
> find a sponsor (and/or co-maintainer). It fixes (hopefully) all outstanding
> bugs except one. 20_64bit_types.patch may need some testing. I hope that
>
On Friday 23 March 2007 20:53, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:23:38PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...)
>
> Have not taken a look at the package, but does the short description
>
> > Description: Sender Policy Framework library, w
re's even a real
RFC. But I could change the wording.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpSAgOjgFqEZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Standards-Version to 3.7.2 without changes.
* Apply 20_spf_dns_include_std_headers.patch: Include arpa/nameser.h and
netdb.h from spf_dns.h instead of defining the constants needed unless
certain HAVE_ macros are defined (Closes: #405885).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL
On Sunday 18 March 2007 21:49, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> Also, a native package means that there
> is no .diff.gz. That means that every version creates a new
> .orig.tar.gz which consumes more mirror space.
(Except that it isn't a .orig.tar.gz but just a .tar.gz.)
--
M
to know which variants of the name of a configuration file to
delete in addition to the file itself, in order to do like dpkg. I've used
file~, #file#, file.bak, and file.ucf-{old,dist,new}.
URL of the DSC: http://www.kibibyte.se/download/debian/pmk_0.10.1-1.dsc
--
Magn
On Saturday 10 March 2007 21:37, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 08:05:55PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Something I've been thinking about:
> >
> > If two packages share a /var/(lib|run|log) subdirectory, how do you know
> > when to remov
alone; let root delete it manually when it's no longer needed
b) use dpkg -S to see if it's still in use
c) use dpkg -l to see if the other package is still installed
d) avoid sharing directories under /var
e) do something else?
Thank you for your interest!
--
Magnus Holmgren
Etch with
the above changes (except the "New upstream version", of course), and if so,
whether I should rename the .orig tarball.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpMgHkbPsstp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 01:54, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A
> brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one
> called ChangeLog, which contains a detailed list of changes made to the
> va
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 08:52, Marcus Better wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > I maintain a package where the upstream author has two changelog files: A
> > brief one called Changes, summarizing the changes, and a detailed one
> > called ChangeLog, which contains a det
be installed as "changelog"?
I'd guess the brief one, since it's the one users are most likely to want to
read first, but on the other hand it looks a bit confusing with both a
changelog(.gz) and a ChangeLog.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
iner <$maintainer_address> $date
8<
There is always a blank line after the maintainer line before the following
(chronologically previous) entry.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpjRGuQ27dfC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;t the preferred
way.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpXjoATd1zQh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the upstream
tarball is no issue even if one wants to import the package into one's own
CVS and use cvs-buildpackage, for example.
> btw, just a hint: it would be simpler using dpatch than applying the
> patches 'on your own'.
And with the right build-dependencies t
On Saturday 02 December 2006 03:03, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> From changelog.Debian:
>
> [...]
> * Repackaged against pristine upstream tarball.
> [...]
Nope, not this time. Is it possible to overwrite files already in the archive,
and if so, how? Do I have to modify the u
On Saturday 02 December 2006 18:05, Amaya wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > it would be most kind if one or more of you could take a look at the
> > new sa-exim package I've prepared, thereby adopting it. (But don't
> > upload it yet; I'd like upstream t
There are no changes in executable code at this time.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpc86j8EuLK4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
#x27;s still in use
c) use dpkg -l to see if the other package is still installed
d) avoid sharing directories under /var
e) do something else?
Thank you for your interest!
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpbaBZdbwffs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
age in the package build directory, with "package"
replaced by the package name.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgp29YyHSOpDl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
suggest it.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpQo6j0HANDw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 08 October 2006 00:10, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to say:
> Hello, dear mentors!
>
> I'm looking for a temporary sponsor of my package "libmail-dkim-perl".
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has previously shown interest, but now
> when I&
are valid and affect
DFSG-freeness, they quite surely aren't going to go after us/you.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpLZMUtTadS0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
a-player will be
> removed soon. If it works with audacious or bmpx, please rename the
> binary package.
It will? Why is that? There is no Serious bug filed against it.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpzXFX2Fpzbj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:59, Thijs Kinkhorst took the opportunity to write:
> On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 12:48 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > > > What's wrong with apt-get source?
> > >
> > > You have to add a line to /etc/apt/sources.list to make it work.
&g
On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:28, martin f krafft took the opportunity to write:
> also sprach Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.27.1124
+0100]:
> > > Or just dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main//pkg.dsc
> > >
> > > instead of t
d of the paragraph speaking about "apt-get source".
What's wrong with apt-get source?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpFfbTlTAWzH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
name of that other source package? It sounds like it
would be better if the package you're making were built from it instead.
--
Magnus Holmgren
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
66 matches
Mail list logo
