Hello Mentors,
to make the long story short this is an "how to deal existing conffiles
and a new set of debconf questions to setup the package?" question.
Now, the package is cpufrequtils and what I'd like to achieve is
providing some nice debconf templates to configure
/etc/default/cpufrequtils
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 02:19:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
>
> > I need a quick suggestion how to handle libcpufreq{0,-dev} within the
> > libsysfs transition.
> > Facts:
> > - current cpufre
Hello,
I need a quick suggestion how to handle libcpufreq{0,-dev} within the
libsysfs transition.
Facts:
- current cpufrequtils is compatible with both libsysfs1 and libsysfs2
- the source package depends on libsysfs-dev >= 1.0.0
- libcpufreq0 uses ${shlibs:Depends} to build dependencies
Now, my
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 09:34:37AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 02:28:32PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Ghe Rivero wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Apart of this, i also hve python bindings:
> > > py
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Ghe Rivero wrote:
[...]
> Apart of this, i also hve python bindings:
> python2.3-libsome:
> /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/libsomemodule.la
> /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/libsome.so
>
> And i have this on lintian:
>
> W: python2.3-
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 02:13:58PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> I am trying to package a library whose upstream is located at
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/fortranposix
>
>
> I already read the libpkg-guide, maint-guide. This problem was not
> discussed in any of them. I googled and a
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 09:01:23PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:48:41PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:32:31PM +0200, giskard wrote:
> > [...]
> > > - nvu (www.autistici.org/giskard/file/frankie/)
h...
#binary
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:48:41PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:32:31PM +0200, giskard wrote:
> [...]
> > - nvu (www.autistici.org/giskard/file/frankie/)
uh, and last but not least, from the nvu qa page:
,---
| There were override disparities fo
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:32:31PM +0200, giskard wrote:
[...]
> - nvu (www.autistici.org/giskard/file/frankie/)
some notes:
- be careful with the version you chose:
# dpkg --compare-versions 1.0pre '>' 1.0 && echo $?
0
so you could have problems when later packaging 1.0
A known strategy f
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 05:13:38PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi
>
> Mattia Dongili wrote:
> >some (hopefully) usefull notes:
> >- why are you trying to install 'bin/ali2gff' instead of 'ali2gff' only?
>
> Because all binary files
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 01:45:25PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi
>
> Arjan Oosting wrote:
> >Op di, 22-03-2005 te 12:04 -0300, schreef Nelson A. de Oliveira:
[...]
> Since it doesn't have DESTDIR, I have created a patch (available here:
> http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/cdbs/0
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:59:38AM +0100, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> On Friday 07 January 2005 22:03, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > Hopefully many of the existing cpufreq related daemons will soon use
> > the provided library (cpufreqd is migrating at least).
>
> Any comment fro
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 10:58:00PM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
> Hi Mattia!
>
> Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > i386 bins and sources available here:
> > deb http://oioio.altervista.org/debian binary/
> > deb-src http://oioio.altervista.org/debian source/
Hello,
this is the second call for sponsors for cpufrequtils, a useful (hint,
sponsor me - sponsor me :)) package with utilities to deal with cpufreq
interface (it contains command line utilities and a shared library).
Hopefully many of the existing cpufreq related daemons will soon use
the provi
Hello,
as my usual sponsor is on vacation I'm looking for a temporary sponsor
for my current cpufreqd package revision (1.2.2-2).
The new revision closes two bugs:
* Renamed debian/po/cz.po into debian/po/cs.po (closes: #285570)
* Now conflicts with cpudyn and powernowd (closes: #281065)
source
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor[1] for the package cpufrequtils[2], source
packages are available here:
deb-src http://oioio.altervista.org/debian source/
and i386 binaries here:
deb http://oioio.altervista.org/debian binary/
Both are built in a sid environment and lintian clean.
thanks a lot to
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:07:38PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:31:47PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > Can somebody help? the package is here:
> > http://oioio.altervista.org/debian/ [1]
>
> I'll sponsor you. I still feel sort of gu
Hi,
the guy who usually uploads cpufreqd for me is not answering my mails
(in the last 2 weeks, maybe he's on vacation).
I have a new revision of the package that fixes an RC bug and I'd like
the package to be in the right place at the right time (as in Freeze
time!).
Can somebody help? the packa
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 08:07:38PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 07:31:47PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > Can somebody help? the package is here:
> > http://oioio.altervista.org/debian/ [1]
>
> I'll sponsor you. I still feel sort of gu
Hi,
the guy who usually uploads cpufreqd for me is not answering my mails
(in the last 2 weeks, maybe he's on vacation).
I have a new revision of the package that fixes an RC bug and I'd like
the package to be in the right place at the right time (as in Freeze
time!).
Can somebody help? the packa
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=260222
[2]: http://oioio.altervista.org/debian/
Here's the control file of the shared library package:
Package: libmqueue4
Version: 4.41-1
Section: libs
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4)
Installed-Size: 32
Maint
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=260222
[2]: http://oioio.altervista.org/debian/
Here's the control file of the shared library package:
Package: libmqueue4
Version: 4.41-1
Section: libs
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4)
Installed-Size: 32
Maint
i-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=260222
[2]: http://oioio.altervista.org/debian/
Here's the control file of the shared library package:
Package: libmqueue4
Version: 4.41-1
Section: libs
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4)
Installed-Size: 32
Maintainer: Mattia Dongili (m
i-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=260222
[2]: http://oioio.altervista.org/debian/
Here's the control file of the shared library package:
Package: libmqueue4
Version: 4.41-1
Section: libs
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4)
Installed-Size: 32
Maintainer: Mattia Dongili (m
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:51:03AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[...]
> > It doesn't matter what the source package says anyway. In order to get
> > s390 to stop building it, you need to get it added to
> > Packages-arch-specific.
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:51:03AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[...]
> > It doesn't matter what the source package says anyway. In order to get
> > s390 to stop building it, you need to get it added to
> > Packages-arch-specific.
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:22:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 01:05:18PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > I'm trying to contact ftpmaters asking them to add
> > xfree86-driver-synaptics to Packages-arch-specific with an '!s390' entry
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:32:05PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-06-07 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 10:03:04AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > On 2004-05-11 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:22:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 01:05:18PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > I'm trying to contact ftpmaters asking them to add
> > xfree86-driver-synaptics to Packages-arch-specific with an '!s390' entry
>
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:32:05PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-06-07 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 10:03:04AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > On 2004-05-11 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:20:58AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 05:09:53PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > sorry for being so pedantic. Today a bug has been submitted (#253616)
> > regarding this issue. The submitter states that the control file
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 10:20:58AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 05:09:53PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > sorry for being so pedantic. Today a bug has been submitted (#253616)
> > regarding this issue. The submitter states that the control file
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:56:50PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-06-07 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 10:03:04AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
> > > Personally I'd immediately change the architecture field and
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:56:50PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-06-07 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 10:03:04AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
> > > Personally I'd immediately change the architecture field and
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 10:03:04AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-05-11 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Subject: xfree86-driver-synaptics blocked by xserver-xfree86 on s390
> [...]
> > the subject[1] says it all, will it ever be
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 10:03:04AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-05-11 Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > Subject: xfree86-driver-synaptics blocked by xserver-xfree86 on s390
> [...]
> > the subject[1] says it all, will it ever be
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:03:38PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:50:09AM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > the subject[1] says it all, will it ever be an xserver-xfree86 for s390?
> > otherwise I'd better chance
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:03:38PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:50:09AM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > the subject[1] says it all, will it ever be an xserver-xfree86 for s390?
> > otherwise I'd better chance
Hi,
I'm forwarding this message to -mentors, is there anybody who can help?
thanks (the same post on debian-x didn't have any answer).
- Forwarded message from Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: xfree86-driver-synaptics blocked by xserver-xfree86 on s390
From
Hi,
I'm forwarding this message to -mentors, is there anybody who can help?
thanks (the same post on debian-x didn't have any answer).
- Forwarded message from Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: xfree86-driver-synaptics blocked by xserver-xfree86 on s390
From
p.d. Non. Feb. MMDCCLVII AUC Andreas Metzler scripsit:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:19:04PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > [I'm sending this message here as it seems that debian-x wasn't the most
> > appropriate place]
> >
> > xfree86-driver-synaptics is an
p.d. Non. Feb. MMDCCLVII AUC Andreas Metzler scripsit:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 03:19:04PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > [I'm sending this message here as it seems that debian-x wasn't the most
> > appropriate place]
> >
> > xfree86-driver-synaptics is an
Hi all,
[I'm sending this message here as it seems that debian-x wasn't the most
appropriate place]
xfree86-driver-synaptics is an xserver-xfree86 driver that supports
special features of synaptics touchpad devices (a pointing device).
I know I'm a bit late in packaging that module but I've been
Hi all,
[I'm sending this message here as it seems that debian-x wasn't the most
appropriate place]
xfree86-driver-synaptics is an xserver-xfree86 driver that supports
special features of synaptics touchpad devices (a pointing device).
I know I'm a bit late in packaging that module but I've been
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 10:41:11PM -0500, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> On Sunday 04 January 2004 19:41, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> What about simply 1.1.0-1?
I'll go with that then.
> Either one is certainly better than an epoch. This way, when 1.2 is
> released,
>
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 10:41:11PM -0500, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> On Sunday 04 January 2004 19:41, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> What about simply 1.1.0-1?
I'll go with that then.
> Either one is certainly better than an epoch. This way, when 1.2 is released,
> you can
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 12:09:12PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:41:48AM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > actually it's me who did the Stupid Thing(TM). :)
[...]
> > the less ugly debian version name I found is *1.1.final-1*. Is it ok or
> > has a
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:05:25AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I packaged cpufreqd version 1.1-rc1 and called it 1.1-rc-1, now 1.1 is
> > out...
> [...]
> > the less ugly debian version name I fou
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 12:09:12PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:41:48AM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> > actually it's me who did the Stupid Thing(TM). :)
[...]
> > the less ugly debian version name I found is *1.1.final-1*. Is it ok or
> > has a
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:05:25AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I packaged cpufreqd version 1.1-rc1 and called it 1.1-rc-1, now 1.1 is
> > out...
> [...]
> > the less ugly debian version name I fou
Hi all,
actually it's me who did the Stupid Thing(TM). :)
I packaged cpufreqd version 1.1-rc1 and called it 1.1-rc-1, now 1.1 is
out...
but
# if `dpkg --compare-versions 1.1-rc-1 lt 1.1-1` ; then echo "1" ; fi
#
ouch! I'm looking around for similar problems (I _can't_ be the first
:)) but stil
Hi all,
actually it's me who did the Stupid Thing(TM). :)
I packaged cpufreqd version 1.1-rc1 and called it 1.1-rc-1, now 1.1 is
out...
but
# if `dpkg --compare-versions 1.1-rc-1 lt 1.1-1` ; then echo "1" ; fi
#
ouch! I'm looking around for similar problems (I _can't_ be the first
:)) but stil
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:06:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 02:10:42PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > Any suggestion about the name?
>
> xfree86-driver-synaptics-utils, maybe? Kind of long and ugly, but
> highly consistent with its cou
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:06:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 02:10:42PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
[...]
> > Any suggestion about the name?
>
> xfree86-driver-synaptics-utils, maybe? Kind of long and ugly, but
> highly consistent with its cou
Hi all,
I started packaging the synaptics touchpad driver[1] and I have a
couple of issues:
1- the upstream package contains also 2 extra utilities to enable
runtime configuration of the driver (synclient and syndaemon). I'd
package them separately and Recommend the utilities from the driver
pack
Hi all,
I started packaging the synaptics touchpad driver[1] and I have a
couple of issues:
1- the upstream package contains also 2 extra utilities to enable
runtime configuration of the driver (synclient and syndaemon). I'd
package them separately and Recommend the utilities from the driver
pack
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:19:01PM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> I'm making a deb of a program I'm developing on my own for my
> university. I would like to make the deb for it is full of binaries and
> libraries and it would be easier to upgrade/add/remove the software.
>
> I'm runn
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:19:01PM +0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> I'm making a deb of a program I'm developing on my own for my
> university. I would like to make the deb for it is full of binaries and
> libraries and it would be easier to upgrade/add/remove the software.
>
> I'm runn
Hello,
I'm a wannabe Debian maintainer (already applied the NM program). I
packaged a small daemon (cpufreqd) of which I'm also the author.
I was wondering If I need to package the sources with or without the
.diff.gz archive.
The Developer Reference says:
If a package is developed specially fo
Hello,
I'm a wannabe Debian maintainer (already applied the NM program). I
packaged a small daemon (cpufreqd) of which I'm also the author.
I was wondering If I need to package the sources with or without the
.diff.gz archive.
The Developer Reference says:
If a package is developed specially fo
60 matches
Mail list logo
