RFS: lisaac

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lisaac". * Package name: lisaac Version : 0.84-1 Upstream Author : Benoit Sonntag * URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html * License : Cecillv2 Section : devel It builds these binary packages: l

RFS: lisaac

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lisaac". * Package name: lisaac Version : 0.84-1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html * License : Cecillv2 (compatible GPL) http://www.cecill.info/licences/Licence

Re: RFS: lisaac

Hello I made all the changes you asked for my lisaac package: * Now it is lintian clean. I added some overrides for the GPL du to the reference in the CeCillv2 licence. *I removed all un commented dh_* in the rules file. *My email is the same everywhere. *I am using dpatch for path.li The uploa

RFS: lisaac

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lisaac". * Package name: lisaac Version : 0.84-1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html * License : Cecillv2 (compatible GPL) http://www.cecill.info/licences/Licence_

RE : RE : RFS: lisaac

. >I realise you did that, however I am not talking about the license, I am >referring to Copyright statements, e.g. > Copyright 2006 James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >They are a separate issue from licenses, as they state who has the >Copyright for the work. Licenses deal with what you as a >u

RE : RE : RFS: lisaac

On (13/09/06 21:59), PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > * I'm a little wary of the copyright situation, as I can't see any > statements within the package. It appears the license is DFSG free, > but you need to include any and all copyright statements in your >

RFS: lisaac (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lisaac". * Package name: lisaac Version : 0.84-1 Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://isaacos.loria.fr/li.html * License : Cecillv2 (compatible GPL) http://www.cecill.info/licences/Licence_

RFS: lisaac (updated)

Hello I made all the changes you asked for my lisaac package: * I removed the unwnated files. * modify debian/rules to remove unnecessary lines * reformat the package description * rearrange the copyright file The upload would fix these bugs: 379054 The package can be found on mentors.debian.ne

tango package

Dear mentors, I am looking for a feedback on my tango package, it is not yet finished but as it use a mysql database and this is my second package, I asked here for critical views on it. It builds 2 libraries liblog4tango4 ans libtango5 and tango-db install the tango-ds service. Not much for n

RE : tango package

> I guess dbconfig-common is the framework so apt-cache rdepends that. Yes I am already using it in the package. but for now it install the databas on the localhost. I need a example of another package that deal with this remote host installation. Thank you Frederic

RFS: lisaac (updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor and feedback for the new version 1:0.13-1 of my package "lisaac". It builds these binary packages: lisaac - Object-oriented language base on prototype lisaac-common - Arch-independent part for lisaac lisaac-doc - Documentation for lisaac lisaac-mode -

RFS: remotetea

Dear mentors, I am working at the french synchotron radiation facility and we are using the Tango constrol system http://tango-controls.org for all our experiments. Most of the graphical part of the control system was written using java (swig) and based on CORBA. The ancestor of this control syst

Re: RFS: remotetea

Le Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:13:56 +0200, Paul Wise a écrit : > 2009/8/3 Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel > : > > > This is my first java package so I need your advices about the way > > to add the right dependencies and how to deal with all the java > > implementations in Debi

Re: RFS: remotetea

Le Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:13:34 +0200, Paul Wise a écrit : > There are an awful lot of changes to the code in the diff.gz and many > of these seem to be unnessecary because they only change a date in a > comment. Any other changes should be forwarded upstream. I did not notice this problem. Seems du

Re: RFS: remotetea

Le Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:26:15 +0200, Paul Wise a écrit : > 2009/8/3 Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel > : > > >> Based on the copyright file, you've repacked the tarball, a > >> get-orig-source target in debian/rules might be appropriate. > > > > Do you h

RFS: remotetea - Sun ONC/RPC support for Java

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "remotetea". * Package name: remotetea Version : 1.0.7-1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : http://remotetea.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL Section : java It build

how to solve a non pic code in an shlib due to assembly code

hello, mentors This mail to speak about a problematic issue that I have when packaging a new package for debian tango-7.0.2. http://tango-controls.org you can find this package on mentors: dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tango/tango_7.0.2-1.dsc lintian complain about non pic co

How to split my tango source package (long)

Hello I am trying to set up a proper packaging for the TANGO distributed control system http://tango-controls.org. you can find my first attempt on the mentors.debian.net dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tango/tango_7.0.2-1.dsc It builds these binary packages: liblog4tango4 - log

Re: RFS: gtklp (updated package)

ngerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

how to add an argument to cmake with the new dh buildsystem

Hello I must pass a few parameters to the cmake command -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DBUILD_DEMOS=OFF -DBUILD_EXTRAS=OFF how can I do this with dh and the cmake buildsystem in the Buildsystem we have this sub configure { my $this=shift; my @flags; # Standard set of cmake fl

RE : how to add an argument to cmake with the new dh b uildsystem

> you should be able to do this: > override_dh_auto_configure: > dh_auto_configure -- -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON -DBUILD_DEMOS=OFF > -DBUILD_EXTRAS=OFF thanks Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma

dependance between source package

Hello I have 2 sources packages Sa and Sb. Sa generate a library "liba" and an executable "a" (which depend on liba) Sb generate a python binding of liba "liba-python" which indeed depend on "liba" so now the question can I use this python binding in the postinst of "a" to configure it. so can I

RE : dependance between source package

> Can you go into more detail? Why do you need python-a to configure a? > Which software are you talking about? Yes I can :) here a better explaination of my problem [1] look at the section 2) of this long mail thanks Frederic [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-mentors@lists.debian.org/ms

RE : LuxRender

Hello Boris > I've packaged LuxRender 1.2.1 (http://www.luxrender.net), and reopened > #461486. However, I have some questions before submitting the package. Great to see that you decided to jump on this package :) > LuxRender uses an open source library, LuxRays, for ray tracing acceleration.

weak-library-dev-dependency is there a lintian bug ?

y: possible N: So now the question, is it a lintian bug or must I change something to solve this "issue". thanks Frederic -- GPG public key 1024D/A59B1171 2009-08-11 fingerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

init script versosity

Hello I am using the /etc/init.d/skeleton (from unstable) file to write my package init scripts. but it seems that the lsb-base default behaviour is to have VERBOSE=no so there is no output. Is it ok with the debian-policy 9.4 Console messages from init.d scripts they say : "This section des

RE : init script versosity

thanks I will ask on debian-devel See you Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

debconf question

ure I did the thing correctly in the package. [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-science/packages/tango.git;a=summary -- GPG public key 1024D/A59B1171 2009-08-11 fingerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RE: debconf question

Hello thanks for your answer > If there's only host and port in your config file, don't try > to re-read it in your postinst. What you have done in your > config script should be enough to read the value that was > previously in the config file, or the one that was set using > debconf (with prior

RE: debconf question

Hello > 22 # what is the name of the tango host > 23 db_input high tango-common/tango-host || true > 24 db_go || true > Hi, > WIth your script here, there are cases where there's no db_set > tango-common/tango-host. That shouldn't happen. You should set it > unconditionally (eg: always)!

RE: Help needed: Bug#618057: dialign: FTBFS: dialign.c:345: undefinedreference to `para_read'

Hello, when you build it with the original makefile the command is gcc -c -O -I-DCONS dialign.c but from the buildd it is gcc -g -O2 -g -O2 dialign.c it seems that the -c parameter do the difference. See you Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with

RE : different version numbers?

> As library packaging is generally regarded as a difficult task, a very > good guide at > http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html > is a recommended reading. That guide contains also very clear > background information on the various version numbering systems > pos

Adding symbols files to the tango package.

fingerprint = E92E 7E6E 9E9D A6B1 AA31 39DC 5632 906F 4696 E015 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel GPG public key 1024D/A59B1171 2009-08-11 fingerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Adding symbols files to the tango package.

e the symbol split between symbols, optional, stacktrace(what for ?). It requier a huge knowledge of the projet internals. Thanks Frederic -- GPG public key 4096R/4696E015 2011-02-14 fingerprint = E92E 7E6E 9E9D A6B1 AA31 39DC 5632 906F 4696 E015 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel GPG pu

Re: Adding symbols files to the tango package.

ol ? Thanks for your advices. Fred. [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=tango -- GPG public key 4096R/4696E015 2011-02-14 fingerprint = E92E 7E6E 9E9D A6B1 AA31 39DC 5632 906F 4696 E015 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel GPG public key 1024D/A59B1171 2009-08-11 fingerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Adding symbols files to the tango package.

.6+dfsg (c++)"CosNotifyFilter::ConstraintInfoSeq_var::~ConstraintInfoSeq_var()@Base" 7.2.6+dfsg (c++)"OutputBitStream::encode_block(short*, HUFFMANTABLE*, HUFFMANTABLE*, short*)@Base" 7.2.6+dfsg (c++)"OutputBitStream::init()@Base" 7.2.6+dfsg as you can see the patch

Re: Adding symbols files to the tango package.

sible to use the patch right ? See you Frederic -- GPG public key 4096R/4696E015 2011-02-14 fingerprint = E92E 7E6E 9E9D A6B1 AA31 39DC 5632 906F 4696 E015 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel GPG public key 1024D/A59B1171 2009-08-11 fingerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Adding symbols files to the tango package.

s. (ex. Why do I have va_list on this arch and __va_list_arg on the other one. Ha! ok this is an implementation detail... See you Fred -- GPG public key 4096R/4696E015 2011-02-14 fingerprint = E92E 7E6E 9E9D A6B1 AA31 39DC 5632 906F 4696 E015 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel GPG public key

duke University contact

fingerprint = E92E 7E6E 9E9D A6B1 AA31 39DC 5632 906F 4696 E015 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel GPG public key 1024D/A59B1171 2009-08-11 fingerprint = 1688 A3D6 F0BD E4DF 2E6B 06AA B6A9 BA6A A59B 1171 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: duke University contact

Le Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:17:07 +0100, Nick Leverton a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:11:52PM +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > Hello > > > > I try to find the licences of a software developped at Duke university > > by a PhD student "named" Wi

Re: duke University contact

Le Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:36:19 +0200, Steven a écrit : > On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 16:09 +0200, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > Le Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:17:07 +0100, > > Nick Leverton a écrit : > > > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:11:52PM +0200, Picca Frédéric

Re: duke University contact

Le Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:12:39 +0300, Andriy Beregovenko a écrit : > http://www.linkedin.com/in/billrankin thanks, I will try thaht one too :) -- GPG public key 4096R/4696E015 2011-02-14 fingerprint = E92E 7E6E 9E9D A6B1 AA31 39DC 5632 906F 4696 E015 uid Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel