Re: ITA: enigma -- A game where you control a marble with

any progress on this? cos i am working on a package .. but i do not handle the libzipios issue that are already addressed in git upstream issue https://github.com/Enigma-Game/Enigma/issues/25 Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Future of "obsession" package

those constants changes irritates , fbautostart seems is just a window like way to make window managers (that are not desktops environments) more away of the meaning of.. and always in the future those "little" changes must be changed again.. why not just let openbox as simple as possible? El dom.

Bug#956414: +1 we need more away from systemd

+1 good work.. please core DD this pacakge need a review! in devuan works as expected -- Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

how can i make parman layout at installer

layout parman at installer, how to made only primary partitions i want to autosetup partitions in the debian installer but from second and go always do logical partitions.. i wants only primary due i only will do two partitions or tree! How can i do that? by example first partition with 40G secon

Re: Looking for a sponsor

what happened with that ? El jue., 2 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 05:24, escribió: > > Hello everyone, > > (TLWR: > I have worked on my fisrt package, and am looking for a DD/DM to check it > and eventually sponsor it into unstable.) > > Some time ago I had to compile the latest version of Heimadll (

Re: Is git obligatory?

El jue., 30 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 20:37, Albert van der Horst ( alb...@spenarnc.xs4all.nl) escribió: > Andrey Rahmatullin schreef op 2019-05-30 18:34: > > "An ITP relates to packaging a git repo for Debian" ITP = Intent to packaging what ever are the source, means its a try to made the packagin

Bug#902405: why this package was not uploaded to ftp main debain!

i dont see any mess in this packagin , please ! upload and make available for users to test!+ Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Replace cron with systemd timer unit?

this will change all the way whitin debian can be a unix like! its enought of systemd intrution! Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2017-08-03 14:24 GMT-04:00 Herminio Hernandez, Jr. < herminio.hernande...@gmail.com>: > The Arch Wiki >

Re: Bug#863108: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install game

interesting, but seems more complicated in background download more software rather than reall need! a complete JDK either a JRE! i need a java runtime to play a game that its native compiled? sound strange but in any case, user never be know right? Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekon

Bug#862114: RFS: xe/0.6.1-1 [ITP] -- simple xargs and apply replacement

xe its not an emulator package name? Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2017-05-08 13:13 GMT-04:00 Nicolas Braud-Santoni : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for my package `xe`: > > * Package name:

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

s. Mailing lists service > administrator should fix this. > El 23/04/17 a les 14:44, PICCORO McKAY Lenz ha escrit: > > oh umm this are out of the main threat.. i want to use > > the archive.debian.net <http://archive.debian.net/> interface, that's > > all, i only hav

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

2017-04-24 3:37 GMT-04:00 Michael . : > For the life of me I do not understand why this is in the Debian Live > mailing list but a couple of things need clarifying, well I think they do > anyway. > > >>oh umm this are out of the main threat.. i want to use the > archive.debian.net interface, that'

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

com 2017-04-23 4:30 GMT-04:00 Philipp Huebner : > Hi > > Am 22.04.2017 um 16:35 schrieb PICCORO McKAY Lenz: > [...] > >> debian have many out (very out) to date packages like ejabberd.. and u >> tell me about "security" please! theres a issue related to

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

2017-04-22 14:59 GMT-04:00 Narcis Garcia : > Please calm down Piccoro. > i forgot that UPPERCASE means more noise. was not the intention.. was only to mark important things.. but do you note the response in bugs 859308 and 859309 i noted some dias ago reportbug (made in pytnhon argg) crashed.. due

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

hi Andreas.. thanks for u'r work, i'll explain to u about my work.. related to solve that preciselly: 2017-04-22 8:36 GMT-04:00 Andreas Heinlein : debian have many out (very out) to date packages like ejabberd.. and u tell me about "security" please! theres a issue related to slim, due bad integr

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

2017-04-22 0:38 GMT-04:00 Paul Wise : > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:02 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > > work on it. It is only for obsolete insecure Debian releases, we > the currrent debian "secure" "fashion" "modern" debian release DOES NOT FIT AND WOR

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

distributions widelly used here for most hardware (with our own patcheds backported from debian stable and lts) 2017-04-21 12:02 GMT-04:00, Andrey Rahmatullin : > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:54:08AM -0400, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: >> yeah, that's why i asked! obviusly i asked due i

Re: someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

te expire, and so DSA took repointed the DNS > to an error page. > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:04 PM PICCORO McKAY Lenz > wrote: > >> some one noted or using any time the https://archive.debian.net/ >> service.. >> >> was usefully for packagin notes and test ov

someone knows about https://archive.debian.net/

some one noted or using any time the https://archive.debian.net/ service.. was usefully for packagin notes and test over other versions.. archived of course.. was usefully for my lives due most old hardware like framegrabber capture devices does not have support today in current klernels... today

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

i dont understand why the other package depends on that? of course, if more a more moco-soft related will be packaged, this package good to be includen in distribution, its a common case in all mocosoft related... the main target its to use more and more their "standars", i really hate all mocosof

Bug#859238: RFS: microsoft-gsl/0.1~2017.03.20~git16a6a41-1

due copyrights, and trademarks, its better do not use the "micosoft" keyword.. the package can be name ms-gsl and produce libmsgsl-dev Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2017-03-31 18:07 GMT-04:00 Коля Гурьев : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > D

Bug#859235: RFS: telegram-desktop/1.0.27-1 -- official telegram messaging application

the package must contains all the b-d .. so u must complete that for a right RFS.. well what a crap, depends on mocosoft fots but its better than nothing.. whatsupp does no provide linux desktop clients... neither source code.. Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2017-0

Bug#826266: RFS: dvtm/0.15-1~bpo8+1 ITP

the problem its that seems here are two situations: 1) mentors removes the packages too soon or policies are ilogic! 2) seems uploaded to ftp package polls but not found? sponsored !? Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2016-06-03 15:03 GMT-04:00 Gianfranco Costamagna <

Bug#820644: RFS: libretro-snes9x [ITP]

2016-06-13 21:37 GMT-04:00 Sérgio Benjamim : > Hey, > This libretro package needs a frontend to work, like RetroArch, Phoenix > [1], Gnome Games [2] or ZMZ [3]. > I think "Provides: snes9x" is not the case, with snes9x or snes9x-gtk the > user expects a standalone program. > that libretro core of

Bug#828024: RFS: libretro-beetle-wswan [ITP]

this package are market as done! but the package are still not in debian package ! removed yet from mentors but i cannot retrieve from sid! the dsc file are not found! Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2016-06-23 20:39 GMT-04:00 Sérgio Benjamim : > Package: sponsorsh

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

2016-04-12 6:44 GMT-04:30 Gianfranco Costamagna : > sdl looks like an embedded library to me > also tremor the codes inside the libretro are modified to fith with libretro cores needs i think! most of siources are like, example mednafen modules are split and then reimplemented separatelly, that in

mentors delete all the work after 2 month when people are full of work!

That its a problem for people that are doing a hard work: >> mentors packages that has a related ITP must be mantain event erased >> in the time! > Tell that to the debian devs who made the mentors website, I don't know why > the website deletes your package after 2 months. and that its a true: >

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

ple. I changed that in Copyright. Take a look > again. > > > cheers, > sergio-br2 > > > > On 06/04/2016 11:36, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: >> >> 2016-04-06 9:37 GMT-04:30 Sergio benjamim Rocha filho >> : >>> >>> MAME changed its license,

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

revised Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2016-04-06 10:06 GMT-04:30 PICCORO McKAY Lenz : > 2016-04-06 9:37 GMT-04:30 Sergio benjamim Rocha filho > : >> MAME changed its license, but Genesis Plus GX uses the old one. >>Also, it's based on some po

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

2016-04-06 9:37 GMT-04:30 Sergio benjamim Rocha filho : > MAME changed its license, but Genesis Plus GX uses the old one. >Also, it's based on some portions of old mame code: > https://github.com/ekeeke/Genesis-Plus-GX/blob/master/LICENSE.txt#L7 i already know, ok i not explain too much, but ...

Bug#820165: RFS: libretro-genesisplusgx/1.7.4+git20160330 [ITP]

The mame license its now commercial compatible and GPL compatible Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com 2016-04-05 22:27 GMT-04:30 Sérgio Benjamim : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Hey dear mentors! > > I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "li

Re: Subject: RFS: adminer/4.2.1-1

I have some notes on that packaging: 1) only configures apache2, lighttpd and nginx are not automatic configured 2) recommends are also depends (php-psql or php-sqlite) 3) adminer does not handled any documentatin around debian specified installation 4) install a lot of plugins but does not provid

Re: mentors.d.n upload issues

2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,196 DEBUG [debexpo.importer.26427] Determining > user from 'Changed-By:' field: William Blough > 2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,196 DEBUG [debexpo.importer.26427] > Changed-By's email address is: de...@blough.us > 2013-07-16 + 02:09:45,380 ERROR [debexpo.importer.26427] R

Re: Why is it so hard to get sponsors.....?

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Hi Lenz, Cheers > > > with time, DDs tend to meet loved ones, i have too, also I have a couple, just one, not several, and I am responsible .. a'n my loves use in mayority linux, not window-like over linux > > make children, be promoted

Re: Why is it so hard to get sponsors.....?

in recent years the debian packagers have focused on licensing, setting aside as much therefore important that the package works .. I've noticed that some reports have response as "is not critical, is still working," or else "not reproducible", or better "u can made a patch u can made a fix u ca..

Re: RFS: simpleburn/1.6.5-1 [ITP]

important fo users respect to the application: package depends are wrong, depends on bash, also on recent libcdio from wheeze.. there's nonsense in a light application to use too hoigh depends for too little apps, in this case users should go letar o soon to more heavy apps.. i wish to use simple

problem shlib error 9 output status error 2 : need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH

i have compiled and debianised razorqt from git and now have this problem: dpkg-shlibdeps: fallo: Cannot continue due to the error above. Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have any shlibs or symbols file. To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

HELL YEAH! On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote: > On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:51 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz > wrote: > > Ping! please! > > http://packages.debian.org/sid/rar > -- Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qglochekone.blogspot.com

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

Ping! please! On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:27 PM, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > Ping? > > ( i also need this package he he) > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote: > > Ping again since 9 days passed. > > Expected at least a "pong". > > >

Re: Upgrade "rar" Package Version

Ping? ( i also need this package he he) On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Ma Xiaojun wrote: > Ping again since 9 days passed. > Expected at least a "pong". > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li

Bug#683840: RFS: razorqt/0.4.1-1~exp1 [ITP]

please see my control file in https://github.com/mckaygerhard/razor-qt/blob/master/distr/deb/debian/control first Manuel in lasted commit https://github.com/mckaygerhard/razor-qt/commit/c5985e8967a2ee6b13f91d4c506b9078a2787e62 i commented all changes about name packages follow debian policy pleas

Re: Minutes from "Getting your packages into Debian"

this stupid DM process only make debian packagin more slower to evolution, i have a problem uploading a debian mentors sig file and nobody respond and solves my problem On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:22 AM, David Bremner wrote: > > Hi all; > > Here are the minutes from the (apparently) annual "mento

Re: unable to upload packages dsc files.. URGENCY

> > > > Wait half an hour and retry: works. > umm i try this.. and nothinh,.. but i'll try this again with my key uploaded in a public server .. maybe replication its slowly > Conclusion (in my case): it can take some time before > a freshly uploaded key is taken into account. > my ley are into a

Re: unable to upload packages dsc files.. URGENCY

sorry.. i dont see the header.. i'm using the same key.. i have loade in mentors a id Current GPG key: 4096R/251CEB87 RSA of 4096 bits, ID 251CEB87, created at 2012-05-31 in my machine: gpg --list-keys pub 4096R/251CEB87 2012-05-31 uid PICCORO Lenz McKAY (venenux & debian pa

unable to upload packages dsc files.. URGENCY

i try to upload my dsc packages and sources but i get key singin errors, i generated the 4096 key and put in debian mentors profile.. but when i upload this happened: GnuPG signature check failed on XX.changes gpg: Signature made Fri May 18 23:24:18 2012 UTC using DSA key ID YYY gp