-ledger.git.tar.xz
I pulled a copy of that & it was at about where I thought it was.
And I've made a note about how to find such archives. Thanks gregor!
> (Just start with https://alioth-archive.debian.org/ and go through
> the directory structure.)
That will be indeed be useful.
--
Robert J. Clay
rjc...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:54 AM Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 08:42:01AM -0400, Robert J. Clay wrote:
> > Is the normal procedure now, to ask here or in debian-devel to have a
> > DD add the project for the package to salsa? My salsa ID is
> > rjclay-gu
I think is where it
should go.
Is the normal procedure now, to ask here or in debian-devel to have a
DD add the project for the package to salsa? My salsa ID is
rjclay-guest.
--
Robert J. Clay, DM
rjc...@gmail.com
j...@rocasa.us
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jamnntpd"
* Package name: jamnntpd
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : Johan Billing
URL : http://ftnapps.sourceforge.net/jamnntpd.html
* License : permiss
> any case. (The new package upgrade I'm working on now involves an
>> upgrade from v1.3.x to v1.4.x; this upgrade for 1.3.46 is currently
>> the last in the 1.3.46 series.)
>
> Ok, sounds fine to me then (please address the
> maintscript/conffile-renaming issue though
(which
> the release team apparently really doesn't like). Are you sure you're
> ok with that?
None of the three bugs I'm seeking to close with this upload are RC,
so I had not anticipated being able to update the package in jessie in
any case. (The new package upgrade I'm
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> 2014/1/2 T o n g :
>> $ quilt refresh
>> No series file found
>
> export QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches
I use the following in .quiltrc :
QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches
--
Robert J. Clay
rjc...@gmail.com
j
Paul,
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 11-08-13 13:43, Robert J. Clay wrote:
>>I figure to reopen that bug but which would best for it to be? As
>> an ITP, because it isn't currently in unstable or testing? Or as an
>> ITA, because i
need
to find out for sure...)
I figure to reopen that bug but which would best for it to be? As
an ITP, because it isn't currently in unstable or testing? Or as an
ITA, because it had been packaged and is present in oldstable?
--
Robert J. Clay
rjc...@gmail.com
j...@rocasa.us
--
is
available at snapshot.debian.org. I primaraily use git these days,
and if what I want to work on is available there (like glimpse is) I
like to use something like 'git-import-dscs --debsnap ...' in order to
create an initial code repository to work with.
--
Robert J. C
Update debhelper compatibility in debian/compat to '8'.
* Explicitly set Debian source format as 3.0 (quilt).
* Add the file debian/patches/Correct_shabang_line.patch.
--
Robert J. Clay
j...@rocasa.us
rjc...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debia
Neil,
On May 25, 3:00 am, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24 May 2007 16:38:58 -0700 "Robert J. Clay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But what about closed ones? The package I've started on
> > (Fidogate) had 9 bugs against it; 8 of
Thijs,
On May 24, 11:30 am, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It makes sense to base your work on the previous package anyway, since that
> might have solved some issues that you didn't think of yet, and it would be a
> pity if those resurfaced.
That's what I started with for the
Neil,
On May 23, 7:40 am, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23 May 2007 03:45:44 -0700 "Robert J. Clay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In your case, I think your ITP should explain why the package should be
> reintroduced because packages aren't remov
On May 23, 7:40 am, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23 May 2007 03:45:44 -0700 "Robert J. Clay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >There are (at least) a couple of programs that used to be in
> > Debian that I would like to get back in.
>
All,
There are (at least) a couple of programs that used to be in
Debian that I would like to get back in. One was dropped from Etch &
the other was dropped from Sarge... I've already started work on one
of them...
Which should I use to announce my intentions? ITA or ITP? (Or
something
16 matches
Mail list logo
