Re: RFS: fuppes

i. > > Le dimanche 14 février 2010 à 14:09 +1100, Robert Massaioli a écrit : > > Thankyou. If I may recommend looking at the depends; I believe that > > they are correct if every part of the package would build natively on > > debian. But some parts don't and I think

Re: Hi, all

Welcome to the mailing list but there is nothing new we can tell you that you cannot read here: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html And you will learn alot just by reading the conversations on this list, I don't really know what else to tell you other than enjoy; :) it's alot

Re: RFS: fuppes

hultheiss wrote: > Robert Massaioli wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fuppes". > > I'll take a look - I'm interested in seeing fuppes in Debian. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debi

RFS: fuppes

ploaded this package for me. Kind regards Robert Massaioli

Fuppes: Package Names and the Separation of a Project into Packages

Hi mentors, Recently I have been developing on fuppes and decided to start packaging it; there was an existing but rather dead ITP for fuppes here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=426048 (Before I go on I jsut want to say that I have read the entire debian policy (and a few sectio

A libtool and automake question (for developing fuppes)

Recently I tried to build fuppes UPnP Media Server (http://fuppes.ulrich-voelkel.de/) but I came across the following error: bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libogg.la: No such file or directory libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libogg.la' is not a valid libtool archive The problem seems to be that Debian is