Bug#775799: RFS: libmodule-install-rtx-perl/0.37-1 [ITP]

2015-02-09 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, d...@debian.org wrote: describe its origin somewhere (changelog, README.Debian, etc.) you should add new entry about debian/patches/01-fix-plugindir.patch and describe its origin here. of cource, this patch's license stays GPL-2. Sorry for late, I've

Bug#775799: RFS: libmodule-install-rtx-perl/0.37-1 [ITP]

2015-01-25 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thanks for reviewing! On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:56 PM, d...@debian.org wrote: - d/copyright: copyright holder is not only Best Practical Solutions but also Audrey Tang c...@audreyt.org. - d/docs: maybe missing. I've fixed them and re-uploaded to mentors. -

Bug#766567: RFS: ruby-serverspec-runner/0.2.4-1 [ITP]

2014-10-24 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:18 PM, d...@debian.org wrote: serverspec is mainly used as a library (framework), not as an application, so ruby-serverspec is suitable package name for it. naming unification is not much important, i think. OK, I've changed package name, and re-upload to

Bug#766567: RFS: ruby-serverspec-runner/0.2.4-1 [ITP]

2014-10-23 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thank you reviewing. On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:40 AM, d...@debian.org wrote: this is application package, so ruby- prefix removed package name serverspec-runner is suitable. Naming of ruby packages https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Naming_of_ruby_packages According to

Bug#766564: RFS: prt/0.19-1 [ITP]

2014-10-23 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:06 AM, d...@debian.org wrote: uploaded. Thanks! regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#766339: RFS: libtest-mock-guard-perl/0.10-1 [ITP]

2014-10-22 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:54 PM, d...@debian.org wrote: uploaded. Thank you! regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#730445: RFS: plsense/0.10+git20131030-1 [ITP]

2014-09-29 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:06 PM, KURASHIKI Satoru lur...@gmail.com wrote: * Package name: plsense Version : 0.10+git20131030-1 I've uploaded updated plsense (0.3.1-1) to mentors. http://mentors.debian.net/package/plsense dget -x

Bug#743592: RFS: python-social-auth/0.1.23-1 [ITP]

2014-04-03 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist User: debian-de...@debian.or.jp Usertags: debianjp Control: block 743022 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-social-auth * Package name: python-social-auth Version : 0.1.23-1 Upstream Author

Bug#730445: RFS: plsense/0.10+git20131030-1 [ITP]

2014-03-29 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Hilko Bengen ben...@debian.org wrote: I have looked at revision 0.20-1 and I'd be happy to upload your package. Thanks for your interest :-) About the Lintian warnings (binary-without-manpage): I noticed that /usr/bin/plsense actually contains some

Re: Bug#722980: Status of ruby1.8 removal transition?

2014-01-08 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.orgwrote: If you drop the binary packages from the control file and upload, the old binaries should go away automatically. Thanks for your comment! Are there any considerations? -- I'm sure they have no rdepends. Not

Re: Bug#722980: Status of ruby1.8 removal transition?

2014-01-06 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org writes: Our goal is to remove ruby1.8 and switch to ruby2.0 as the default, ASAP, so it would be nice if you started building extensions for 1.9.1 and 2.0 (only). Okay, thanks.

Bug#732667: RFS: rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue/0.06-1 [ITP]

2013-12-26 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.orgwrote: debian/changelog? s/changelog/copyright/ orz yes, sorry. And I just uploaded. Thanks. regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru

Bug#732669: RFS: rt-extension-customfieldsonupdate/0.01-1 [ITP]

2013-12-24 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.orgwrote: Hi, I just upload this package. Thanks! regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru

Bug#732667: RFS: rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue/0.06-1 [ITP]

2013-12-24 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Satoru KURASHIKI lur...@gmail.com wrote: debian/control: You are using obsolete field. You can use upstream-contact instead of maintainer and upstream-name instead of name. debian/changelog? s/changelog/copyright/ orz regards, -- KURASHIKI

Bug#732667: RFS: rt-extension-spawnlinkedticketinqueue/0.06-1 [ITP]

2013-12-24 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.orgwrote: Hi, I checked your package. Thanks for reviewing, debian/control: You are using obsolete field. You can use upstream-contact instead of maintainer and upstream-name instead of name.

Bug#732677: RFS: ruby-specinfra/0.0.16-1 [ITP]

2013-12-20 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:15 PM, d...@debian.org wrote: checked and uploaded. Thanks! regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru

Bug#728973: RFS: libclass-std-storable-perl/0.0.1-1 [ITP]

2013-11-07 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:58 PM, d...@debian.org wrote: uploaded. Thanks! regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru

Bug#717780: RFS: ruby-serverspec/0.7.1-1 [ITP] -- RSpec tests for your servers

2013-07-31 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thank you checking it! On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:07 PM, d...@debian.org wrote: ruby-serverspec: Newer version (0.7.2) available. debian/control: don't you use anonscm.debian.org repository? I'm considering to use github as its repository, so will do (after I could deal with it using

Bug#717819: RFS: rt-extension-calendar/0.17-1 [ITP] -- Calender View for Request Tracker

2013-07-31 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.orgwrote: I just upload this package. Thanks sponsoring it! regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

2012-07-23 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thank you for reviewing this package! On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: I found this in debian/copyright : Source: branch from http://launchpad.net/bzr-email and hand-packed by tar cf - | gzip -9. That's not really detailed information. I

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

2012-07-23 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: (adding also DMUA): - DM-Upload-Allowed. Did you agree that with someone who is going to sponsor this ? No. That is simply my intent, means I want to add DMUA: yes, and I hope it would also reviewed to be or not to

Bug#677347: RFS: rt-extension-jsgantt

2012-07-21 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? This package is NEW, and there is no hope to be included in wheezy. So, as suggested, I try to tag this bug as not-for-wheezy and delete package from mentors. #

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email

2012-07-11 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thanks for your time, On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: Looking at this package: http://mentors.debian.net/package/bzr-email Version:0.0.1~bzr58-1 Uploaded: 2012-06-28 00:14 How was bzr-email_0.0.1~bzr58.orig.tar.gz created ?

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email

2012-07-11 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote: I meant to suggest this part of developers-reference : Detailed information on how the repackaged source was obtained, and on how this can be reproduced should be provided in debian/copyright. OK (I

Re: How to rebuild binary package to fix bugs?

2012-06-30 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thanks for your mentoring. On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote: you do not need to prepare binNMU patch. A binNMU is built from the same source package and thus does not need a patch at all. Just someone who triggers a rebuild. See [1] for instructions to

How to rebuild binary package to fix bugs?

2012-06-28 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, I've explored RC bugs list, and consider helping to close this: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=668209 It seems that videolan binary package depends on old (build-time) xulrunner, and needs to be recompiled against current xulrunner. So, there is no need to touch

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

2012-06-28 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com wrote: I'm sending this on to the pkg-bazaar list. Would you be interested in maintaining this as part of that team? Does the team needs some help? Though I'm not a skilled python developer, bzr packaging is

Bug#679344: RFS: bzr-email/0.0.1~bzr58-1 [ITA]

2012-06-27 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bzr-email * Package name: bzr-email Version : 0.0.1~bzr58-1 Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd * URL : https://launchpad.net/bzr-email * License : GPL-2+

Bug#679201: RFS: mysqltuner/1.2.0-1 [ITA]

2012-06-26 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mysqltuner. * disclaimer * This is not a hijacking. I've contacted current maintainer (CC-ing), and kindly replied as welcome taking over. So, I think this RFS will save our trouble (to orphan

Re: Can I adopt removed package?

2012-05-24 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thank you for your comments. On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:33 PM, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: The library has already been removed from the archive, you will need to reintroduce it, meaning you need an ITP. The existing packaging can be found on snapshot.d.o:

Re: Bug#620550: Please advice about symbols versioning (was Re: How to close bug #620550?

2011-08-25 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Satoru KURASHIKI lur...@gmail.com wrote: I guess there is no PHP code which using GDBM code. If there is, they had falled into troubles after php switched to link from gdbm to qdbm, because PHP source package also doesn't include hovel.h. I think that I

Re: Please advice about symbols versioning (was Re: How to close bug #620550?

2011-08-13 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thanks for your comment. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Keith Lawson ke...@nowhere.ca wrote: Don't use libqdbm15. Upstream might (and probably will!) use such SONAME for their own purposes in the future. Are there actually any packages in Debian using gdbm symbols provided by

Re: What is needed to upload a package as DM?

2011-07-29 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, Thanks for your replies! On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Ryan Kavanagh ryana...@kubuntu.org wrote: Have you tried replying to the email and asking ftp-masters what went wrong? I had a similar issue last week and they told me that the issue was caused by a space before the comma in the

What is needed to upload a package as DM?

2011-07-26 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
hi, I'm trying to upload a package to incoming queue as DM, but it fails. Reject Reasons: lur...@gmail.com is not in Maintainer or Uploaders of source package yaskkserv I'm sure that what tutorial says (http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer/Tutorial): 1) DMUA: yes 2) my key is in

RFS: goldencheetah

2011-03-08 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package goldencheetah. * Package name: goldencheetah Version : 2.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Sean Rhea sean.c.r...@gmail.com * URL : http://goldencheetah.org/ * License : GPL2 Section : misc It builds

RFS: qdbm (updated package)

2009-09-14 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8.77-1 of orphaned package qdbm. It builds these binary packages: libqdbm++-dev - QDBM Database Libraries for C++ [development] (transitional packa libqdbm-dev - QDBM Database Libraries [development] libqdbm-java - QDBM Database

RFS: hyperestraier (updated package)

2009-09-14 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.13-1 of orphaned package hyperestraier. It builds these binary packages: hyperestraier - a full-text search system for communities libestraier-dev - a full-text search system Libraries [development] libestraier-java - Hyper

RFS: yaskkserv

2008-01-19 Thread Satoru KURASHIKI
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package yaskkserv. * Package name: yaskkserv Version : 0.3.8-1 Upstream Author : Tadashi Watanabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://umiushi.org/~wac/yaskkserv/ * License : GPL2 Section : utils It builds