hi,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, d...@debian.org wrote:
describe its origin somewhere (changelog, README.Debian, etc.)
you should add new entry about debian/patches/01-fix-plugindir.patch
and describe its origin here. of cource, this patch's license stays GPL-2.
Sorry for late, I've
hi,
Thanks for reviewing!
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 8:56 PM, d...@debian.org wrote:
- d/copyright: copyright holder is not only Best Practical Solutions
but also Audrey Tang c...@audreyt.org.
- d/docs: maybe missing.
I've fixed them and re-uploaded to mentors.
-
hi,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:18 PM, d...@debian.org wrote:
serverspec is mainly used as a library (framework), not as an application,
so ruby-serverspec is suitable package name for it.
naming unification is not much important, i think.
OK, I've changed package name, and re-upload to
hi,
Thank you reviewing.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:40 AM, d...@debian.org wrote:
this is application package, so ruby- prefix removed package name
serverspec-runner is suitable.
Naming of ruby packages
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Naming_of_ruby_packages
According to
hi,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:06 AM, d...@debian.org wrote:
uploaded.
Thanks!
regards,
--
KURASHIKI Satoru
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
hi,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:54 PM, d...@debian.org wrote:
uploaded.
Thank you!
regards,
--
KURASHIKI Satoru
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
hi,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:06 PM, KURASHIKI Satoru lur...@gmail.com wrote:
* Package name: plsense
Version : 0.10+git20131030-1
I've uploaded updated plsense (0.3.1-1) to mentors.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/plsense
dget -x
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-de...@debian.or.jp
Usertags: debianjp
Control: block 743022 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-social-auth
* Package name: python-social-auth
Version : 0.1.23-1
Upstream Author
hi,
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Hilko Bengen ben...@debian.org wrote:
I have looked at revision 0.20-1 and I'd be happy to upload your
package.
Thanks for your interest :-)
About the Lintian warnings (binary-without-manpage): I noticed that
/usr/bin/plsense actually contains some
hi,
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.orgwrote:
If you drop the binary packages from the control file and upload, the
old binaries should go away automatically.
Thanks for your comment!
Are there any considerations? -- I'm sure they have no rdepends.
Not
hi,
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org writes:
Our goal is to remove ruby1.8 and switch to ruby2.0 as the default,
ASAP, so it would be nice if you started building extensions for 1.9.1
and 2.0 (only).
Okay, thanks.
hi,
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.orgwrote:
debian/changelog?
s/changelog/copyright/
orz
yes, sorry.
And I just uploaded.
Thanks.
regards,
--
KURASHIKI Satoru
hi,
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.orgwrote:
Hi,
I just upload this package.
Thanks!
regards,
--
KURASHIKI Satoru
hi,
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Satoru KURASHIKI lur...@gmail.com wrote:
debian/control:
You are using obsolete field. You can use upstream-contact instead
of maintainer
and upstream-name instead of name.
debian/changelog?
s/changelog/copyright/
orz
regards,
--
KURASHIKI
hi,
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.orgwrote:
Hi,
I checked your package.
Thanks for reviewing,
debian/control:
You are using obsolete field. You can use upstream-contact instead
of maintainer
and upstream-name instead of name.
hi,
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:15 PM, d...@debian.org wrote:
checked and uploaded.
Thanks!
regards,
--
KURASHIKI Satoru
hi,
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:58 PM, d...@debian.org wrote:
uploaded.
Thanks!
regards,
--
KURASHIKI Satoru
hi,
Thank you checking it!
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:07 PM, d...@debian.org wrote:
ruby-serverspec: Newer version (0.7.2) available.
debian/control: don't you use anonscm.debian.org repository?
I'm considering to use github as its repository, so will do (after
I could deal with it using
hi,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.orgwrote:
I just upload this package.
Thanks sponsoring it!
regards,
--
KURASHIKI Satoru
hi,
Thank you for reviewing this package!
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
I found this in debian/copyright :
Source: branch from http://launchpad.net/bzr-email and hand-packed
by tar cf - | gzip -9.
That's not really detailed information. I
hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
(adding also DMUA):
- DM-Upload-Allowed.
Did you agree that with someone who is going to sponsor this ?
No. That is simply my intent, means I want to add DMUA: yes, and
I hope it would also reviewed to be or not to
hi,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ?
This package is NEW, and there is no hope to be included in wheezy.
So, as suggested, I try to tag this bug as not-for-wheezy and delete package
from mentors.
#
hi,
Thanks for your time,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
Looking at this package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/bzr-email
Version:0.0.1~bzr58-1
Uploaded: 2012-06-28 00:14
How was bzr-email_0.0.1~bzr58.orig.tar.gz created ?
hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
I meant to suggest this part of developers-reference :
Detailed information on how the repackaged source was obtained, and on
how
this can be reproduced should be provided in debian/copyright.
OK (I
hi,
Thanks for your mentoring.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Arno Töll a...@debian.org wrote:
you do not need to prepare binNMU patch. A binNMU is built from the
same source package and thus does not need a patch at all. Just someone
who triggers a rebuild.
See [1] for instructions to
hi,
I've explored RC bugs list, and consider helping to close this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=nobug=668209
It seems that videolan binary package depends on old (build-time) xulrunner,
and needs to be recompiled against current xulrunner.
So, there is no need to touch
hi,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
a.star...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sending this on to the pkg-bazaar list. Would you be interested in
maintaining this as part of that team?
Does the team needs some help?
Though I'm not a skilled python developer, bzr packaging is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package bzr-email
* Package name: bzr-email
Version : 0.0.1~bzr58-1
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd
* URL : https://launchpad.net/bzr-email
* License : GPL-2+
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mysqltuner.
* disclaimer *
This is not a hijacking. I've contacted current maintainer (CC-ing),
and kindly replied as welcome taking over.
So, I think this RFS will save our trouble (to orphan
hi,
Thank you for your comments.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:33 PM, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:
The library has already been removed from the archive, you will need
to reintroduce it, meaning you need an ITP.
The existing packaging can be found on snapshot.d.o:
hi,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Satoru KURASHIKI lur...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess there is no PHP code which using GDBM code. If there is, they
had falled into troubles after php switched to link from gdbm to qdbm, because
PHP source package also doesn't include hovel.h.
I think that I
hi,
Thanks for your comment.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Keith Lawson ke...@nowhere.ca wrote:
Don't use libqdbm15. Upstream might (and probably will!) use such SONAME
for their own purposes in the future.
Are there actually any packages in Debian using gdbm symbols provided by
hi,
Thanks for your replies!
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Ryan Kavanagh ryana...@kubuntu.org wrote:
Have you tried replying to the email and asking ftp-masters what went
wrong? I had a similar issue last week and they told me that the issue
was caused by a space before the comma in the
hi,
I'm trying to upload a package to incoming queue as DM, but it fails.
Reject Reasons:
lur...@gmail.com is not in Maintainer or Uploaders of source package yaskkserv
I'm sure that what tutorial says
(http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer/Tutorial):
1) DMUA: yes
2) my key is in
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package goldencheetah.
* Package name: goldencheetah
Version : 2.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Sean Rhea sean.c.r...@gmail.com
* URL : http://goldencheetah.org/
* License : GPL2
Section : misc
It builds
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8.77-1
of orphaned package qdbm.
It builds these binary packages:
libqdbm++-dev - QDBM Database Libraries for C++ [development]
(transitional packa
libqdbm-dev - QDBM Database Libraries [development]
libqdbm-java - QDBM Database
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.13-1
of orphaned package hyperestraier.
It builds these binary packages:
hyperestraier - a full-text search system for communities
libestraier-dev - a full-text search system Libraries [development]
libestraier-java - Hyper
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yaskkserv.
* Package name: yaskkserv
Version : 0.3.8-1
Upstream Author : Tadashi Watanabe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://umiushi.org/~wac/yaskkserv/
* License : GPL2
Section : utils
It builds
38 matches
Mail list logo
