On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 03:43:05PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Am 12.02.2023 um 07:54 teilte min sun mit:
>
> Hi,
>
> > To access further information about this package, please visit the
> > following URL:
> >
> >https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcommons-collections4-java/
> >
> If y
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 07:55:08AM +, min sun wrote:
>
> Hi mentors!
>
> I packaged new version of libcommons-validator [1] and uploaded again to
> debian mentors[2], please refer to Upload #2 .
Hi!
I will review and sponsor the upload soon. Thank you for your
contribution to Debian!
C
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:33:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html
> > Rober
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote:
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html
> Roberto, Tobias, thanks for your answers.
>
> I have removed MagicSFver2.sf2 from the package and adde
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 10:12:08AM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> fwlogwatch (1.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
Hi William,
Thank you for helping with fwlogwatch. I've taken a look at your
updated package and things look really good. I not
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:12:02AM +0200, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xlog"
>
> * Package name: xlog
>Version : 2.0.17-1
>Upstream Author : Andy Stewart KB1OIQ
>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>>I'm not in the Java packaging community, but from a little searching
>>.m2 appears to be created by the Maven build system, and I know for
>>sure there is software packaged in Debian that uses Maven, so maybe
>
>>you'd want to take a
On 09/24/2016 02:27 AM, Christopher Hoskin wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "csvjdbc"
Hi Christopher,
Thank you for the update. Uploaded.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sign
On 05/09/2015 03:46 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
Hi Gabriele,
I have built against jessie-backports and uploaded the package.
Thank you for the update.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
owner 740035 !
tags 740035 +pending
thanks
Hi Gabriele,
I'm working on these.
Thanks,
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 03/15/2013 03:42 AM, Damian Minkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we've just updated the package on mentors.debian.net following the
> comments we recieved:
> The dsc file can be found at:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jitsi/jitsi_2.0.4506.10553-1.dsc
>
> Regards
> Damian
Hello Damian,
If
On 10/08/2012 04:25 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
> Control: block 689980 by -1
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sweethome3d-furniture-editor"
Hi Gabriele,
I am reviewing this package and will sponsor an upload
On 06/08/2011 07:58 AM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.3-1
> of my package "freeplane".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> freeplane - Java program to create and edit mind maps.
> libjortho-freeplane-java - Java spell-checking libra
Hello Remi,
I have uploaded the package to experimental archive instead of unstable,
just for the duration of the freeze. Please feel free to contact me
directly for future uploads of this package, and thank you for your
contribution to Debian.
Cheers,
tony
On 08/19/2010 04:46 AM, Rémi Debay wr
Hi Remi,
I'm still willing to sponsor the package and have looked at your
changes - I've just been a little slow. I'll upload this weekend.
Thank you,
tony
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:46:19PM +0200, Rémi Debay wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "service-wrappe
On 08/06/2010 07:58 AM, Rémi Debay wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "service-wrapper-java".
>
> * Package name : service-wrapper-java
> Version : 3.5.3-1
> Upstream Author : Tanuki Software Ltd
> * URL : http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/
> * License : GPLv
Sponsored.
Cheers,
tony
On 07/23/2010 05:35 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2010-07-24 00:29, Chris Baines wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cpptasks".
>
>> * Package name: cpptasks
>> Version : 1.0~b5-1
>> Upstream Author : Unknown
>> * URL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Eric,
I have sponsored the upload. Please feel free to contact me directly for future
uploads of freeplane.
Regards,
tony
On 07/19/2010 01:15 AM, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freeplane".
>
> *
Uploaded. You can contact me directly for future uploads of this
package.
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 15:24 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:17:05AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >
> > > - dget
> > > http://mentors.debi
Uploaded. Feel free to contact me directly for subsequent uploads of
this package.
Thank you,
Tony
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 19:46 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.5-1
> of my package "prips". I've adopted the Debian package,
> and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hello mentors,
>
> Can somebody help me with this error please?
>
> $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S
> is runnig fine...
>
> $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -nc
> giving me this error
Any reason you're using sudo instead of -ffakeroot?
Hi Paul,
I must have missed your previous email. I'm a long-time nedit user, and
so am happy to see it continue to be supported. Give me a little time
to get a few other things taken care of on my side and I'll review it
and prepare an upload.
Thank you,
Tony
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:45 +0100,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Koch wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:47:43PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>> (CC'ed to Debian Mentors).
>>
>> Dear Mentors,
>>
>> Myself and a friend have managed to package libj2ssh-java.
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 the mental interface of
> Elimar Riesebieter told:
>
>> Hi mentors,
> [...]
>> ripit (3.6.0-0) unstable; urgency=low
>
> Fixed to 3.6.0-1.
>
> Please notice, that I am looking for an uploader. This isn
Another thing to realize is that the number of binary .debs generated from a
source package is dictated by the contents of debian/control. Each
"Package:" stanza indicates another binary .deb to be generated by the package.
(Sorry if that's already been mentioned. I didn't see it, and couldn't t
This has been uploaded to the archive.
Cheers,
tony
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for debmirror 20070123. Preferably someone
> using it but anyone will do.
>
> MfG
> Goswin
>
> http://mrvn.homeip.net/debmirror/
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007
This has been uploaded to the archive.
Cheers,
tony
Emfox Zhou wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.17-1
> of my package "zim".
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Uploaded to the archive. Thanks for updating the package (and for
removing all of the {arch} stuff that was in the .diff.gz of the 0.8 version).
Cheers,
tony
Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.0-1
> of my package "radvd".
>
> It build
This package is being uploaded to experimental now. (It takes a while for
me to push 65MB.)
Jean Parpaillon wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I've built new packages of Wormux. This is an alpha version of Wormux
> upstream code so it should go to experimental distro. Is it possible ?
>
> It builds the
Sponsored. By the way, I made one change to the package in
debian/changelog; I modified bug number "#36452" to be "#364524".
Regards,
tony
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> could one please upload the new vwrsion of moc?
>
> moc (2.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * New upstream versi
George Danchev wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.8.6-2
> of my package "shc".
Uploaded to the archive.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Emfox Zhou wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.16-1
> of my package "zim".
zim_0.16 has been uploaded.
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Kevin Coyner wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the updated version 0.1.5-10
> of my package "bbtime". It is lintian clean and builds fine in a
> pbuilder sid chroot.
uploaded to the archive
Cheers,
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sponsored.
Cheers,
tony
Willi Mann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm searching for a temporary sponsor for logwatch 7.3.1-2. It's
> available from
>
> http://pkg-logwatch.alioth.debian.org/apt/pool/main/l/logwatch/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sponsored (but not yet uploaded).
Kevin Coyner wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.4
> of my package "rpl". The package was recently orphaned.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
> Hi mentors,
>
> I have a problem with bug reporting. I maintain a package and found some
> bugs with it. Is it correct way to report bugs on my own package, or should
> I just fix these bugs and describe about it on changelog? I briefly read
> Debian Developer's Reference,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - pag -
> The second program is pag - a password generator written in c. It can
> generate numbers,
> signs or both together, so 3 options. You can set the length of the password.
> You can
> generate just on password to stdout or a complete password list in a *.txt
>
Hello George,
I'm looking at this package. Here are a couple of comments so far:
debian/control:
* The package Architecture should be "all" instead of "any" - this will
prevent the (identical) package from being built for every Debian architecture.
* You can remove ${shlibs:Depends} from Depen
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.04-18
> of my package "wmspaceweather".
sponsored
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.91-3
> of my package "wmdonkeymon".
sponsored
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-7
> of my package "wmtz".
sponsored
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.24-5
> of my package "wmfishtime".
Sponsored.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-2
> of my package "wmmisc".
Uploaded.
Thanks,
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 18:59 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
>> Dear package maintainers...
>>
>> a sponsor of Debian packages today sent an email to the mentors.debian.net
>> support email address and I would like to forward the suggestion here.
>> Please tell us if you found a
Niko Tyni wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jzip
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Sponsored.
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tstat".
>
> * Package name: tstat
> Version : 1.01-1
> Upstream Author : Dario Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marco Mellia
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://tstat.tlc.polito.it/
> * Licens
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.2-8
> of my package "mysql-navigator".
Uploaded.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7-4
> of my package "xsysinfo".
uploaded
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Eugene,
I'm looking at your package now and agree to sponsor it. It appears that
you've erased the changelog entry for the NMU of 0.11-0.1 which closed a
couple of those bugs. Instead of removing that entry, I suggest that you
leave it intact, and then request that the sponsor build with t
Kevin Coyner wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package 'python-htmlgen'. This is a great
> little Python module that generates html pages on the fly.
Sponsored.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Uploaded.
tony
Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
> * Sat 2006-07-01 jari.aalto AT cante.net (Jari Aalto+mail.linux)
>> I'm looking for sponsor for followin package. Details below.
>>
>> ITA: ace-of-penguins -- Solitaire-games with penguin-look
-BEGIN
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hello Harri,
>
>> Is there a changelog of the Debian policy online?
>> Actually I would have expected a pointer on
>> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/, but maybe
>> I am too blind to see.
>
> That depends on what information you need. If you're refering to the
> p
I'll sponsor this.
Cheers,
tony
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:54:01PM -0400, James Stark wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "distributed-net".
>
> * Package name: distributed-net
> Version : 2.9012.497-1
> Upstream Author : distributed.net
> * URL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sponsored and uploaded to the archive.
Thanks,
tony
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm here again in search for a sponsor for libcrypt-simple-perl .
> Since the first request I've corrected some warning at build-time,
> changed dependences in debian/
Sponsored. Thanks Niko.
tony
Niko Tyni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reposting this since I didn't get any comments last time (a month
> ago). These are quite simple packages. Please consider sponsoring
> them.
>
> Name: festvox-suopuhe-lj
> License: LGPL
> ITP: #341964
> Description: Finnish female sp
Just to make sure we're all talking about the same thing, Sandro, are
you referring to this:
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/
If so, I think you should have read the introduction more carefully,
where the author states:
"The intended use of such a newly created arc
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, David B Harris wrote:
> Hardly. Every Debian Developer has the ability to run arbitrary code as
> root on everybody's system. Do you want to try and make the argument
> that regardless of whether the person has proved spiteful, unstable,
> mean, and just generally a jackass ..
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, David B Harris wrote:
> Hardly. Every Debian Developer has the ability to run arbitrary code as
> root on everybody's system. Do you want to try and make the argument
> that regardless of whether the person has proved spiteful, unstable,
> mean, and just generally a jackass ..
Hi Jerome,
I build like this:
dpkg-buildpackge -rfakeroot -us -uc
(actually, I use a little script called "dbuild" that tacks a $* on the
end of the line in case I need to "dbuild -sa")
Once the packages builds correctly and I've reviewed it, I use
debsign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM
> +1000:
> > *very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages
> > uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to
> > pu
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:05:09PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
> > I would like to sponsor a package of a friend
> >
> > the first time, I (of course) check the package
> > (lintian, install it, etc etc)
> >
> >
> > but what about the next times? what is the
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:05:09PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
> > I would like to sponsor a package of a friend
> >
> > the first time, I (of course) check the package
> > (lintian, install it, etc etc)
> >
> >
> > but what about the next times? what is the
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:10:48AM +0300, Shiju p. Nair wrote:
> > Am currently mainatains two packages ( libnet-easytcp-perl & libmng )
> > both sponsored by Tony Mancil and am interested in adopting more
> > orphaned packages. But Tony no longer responds
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:10:48AM +0300, Shiju p. Nair wrote:
> > Am currently mainatains two packages ( libnet-easytcp-perl & libmng )
> > both sponsored by Tony Mancil and am interested in adopting more
> > orphaned packages. But Tony no longer responds
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> While testing a patch from upstream to fix a bug in my libxmltv-perl
> package, I discovered another bug related to the package version
> for libhtml-tableextract-perl (one XMLTV script requires 1.08, the
> Debian version of the package is 1.06-2).
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> While testing a patch from upstream to fix a bug in my libxmltv-perl
> package, I discovered another bug related to the package version
> for libhtml-tableextract-perl (one XMLTV script requires 1.08, the
> Debian version of the package is 1.06-2).
FWIW, I typically respond via private email too. Perhaps we should
resurrect http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ (which
still functions, but seems to be outdated), or try using the RFS
suggestion someone recently posted?
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 25-Ju
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, David H. Askew wrote:
> I am building some unofficial(for now) debs for jedit... and have
> completed building them for the x86 arch .. and I got to thinking of
> something... is it possible to build debs without a dependent arch?
Hi David,
if I understand correctly, all you
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, David H. Askew wrote:
> I am building some unofficial(for now) debs for jedit... and have
> completed building them for the x86 arch .. and I got to thinking of
> something... is it possible to build debs without a dependent arch?
Hi David,
if I understand correctly, all yo
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, pp wrote:
> I make "Midgard CMS" packages from daily cvs.
> We already have sid and woody packages.
> Official existing packages do not work
> properly , and there is no info from its maintainers
> , so how may I uplod my packages?
I would start by contacting the current De
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Martin Butterweck wrote:
> I ITP some perl modules, is there something special I have to know about
> packaging them ? Or are perl packages just like all other packages ?
Please see the Perl Policy: http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/
Cheers,
tony
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Martin Butterweck wrote:
> I ITP some perl modules, is there something special I have to know about
> packaging them ? Or are perl packages just like all other packages ?
Please see the Perl Policy: http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/
Cheers,
tony
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Amaya wrote:
> At work, we are making custom Debian packages and we need a special
> versioning system so that apt does not try to replace our package with
> a newer upstream one.
>
> I would like to know if there's a standard way to proceed, apart from
> setting the debian v
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Amaya wrote:
> At work, we are making custom Debian packages and we need a special
> versioning system so that apt does not try to replace our package with
> a newer upstream one.
>
> I would like to know if there's a standard way to proceed, apart from
> setting the debian
On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the pointer
> to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild it.
>
> It should be the original file downloaded from the upstream author
> without any changes so that the md5sum compares to an
On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the pointer
> to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild it.
>
> It should be the original file downloaded from the upstream author
> without any changes so that the md5sum compares to a
I'm working on a package for ripperX, which comes in a ripperX_2.0 tarball
and extracts itself into ripperX-2.0 directory, and produces a "ripperX"
binary.
When I left things as they were upstream, dh_make doesn't complain, but I
get all kinds of problems actually trying to build the package. (dp
I'm working on a package for ripperX, which comes in a ripperX_2.0 tarball
and extracts itself into ripperX-2.0 directory, and produces a "ripperX"
binary.
When I left things as they were upstream, dh_make doesn't complain, but I
get all kinds of problems actually trying to build the package. (d
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 2915T060004-0700, Rick Younie wrote:
> > Sponsee? Tony made that one up didn't he? I can see the
> > confusion in a couple years when the number of Debian maintainers
> > hits a few million. "What's that language you're speaking?
> > D
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 2915T060004-0700, Rick Younie wrote:
> > Sponsee? Tony made that one up didn't he? I can see the
> > confusion in a couple years when the number of Debian maintainers
> > hits a few million. "What's that language you're speaking?
> >
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Joop Stakenborg wrote:
> I am sponsoring drew parsons and would like to upload his packages
> with only his entry in the changelog. Is that possible?
>
> My guess is that the package will be rejected because he is not
> a debian maintainer yet
Ah, finally something I
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Joop Stakenborg wrote:
> I am sponsoring drew parsons and would like to upload his packages
> with only his entry in the changelog. Is that possible?
>
> My guess is that the package will be rejected because he is not
> a debian maintainer yet
Ah, finally something
On Sun, 21 May 2000, Christian Hammers wrote:
> /home/gchavdarov/mysql32/mysql-3.22.32# dpkg-buildpackage
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package is mysql
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 3.22.32-1
> dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> debian/rules cle
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Jay Kelly wrote:
> I am currently running Windows 2000 as my file server with three clients
> running Windows 98. Can I replace the Windows 2000 server with Linux and
> still have the Windows 98 clients log into the Linux server just as before?
> Any help would be appreciated.
I did this same thing to setup a Debian mirror at work. If you look
carefully, all you have to do is delete the existings Packages.gz files
(since they are for a single CD) and mv Packages-cd.gz Packages.gz (do the
same for the uncompressed packages). It's a lot easier if you do this
with a find
ook at the
package.
Regards,
tony mancill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Race is not a competition
http://www.debian.org | Sex is not a job description
(Peart ->) | We hold these truths to be self-evident...
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Bruce Korb wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The ins
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I would like to package texdoctk for Debian and I'm looking for a sponsor.
Hello Adrian,
I'll be happy to sponsor this for you.
Regards,
tony
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Danger + Survival = Fun
http://www.debian.org |(Neil Peart)
Hi David,
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, David Fernandez Vaamonde wrote:
> The program needs a patch to be applied to the kernel... How can you mark
> this need in the package ? Should it be automatized?
I went though this same thing with "wanipe" package. If the patch is
stable, but unlikely to be part
On 9 Nov 1999, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> [snip]
> > > Hence, a program compiled with the Version 1 header will crash
> > > if linked against the version 2 library.
> [snip]
> > > This makes distributing
> > > binary programs very hard if the library is a '.so' because it's
> > > very likely that the
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:20:07PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > We don't have a scheme which doesn't force other arches to
> > rebuild beacuse of another arch build's mistake, right?
>
> I think that we use -2.0.1 , meaning "a recompile of -2". I'v
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, David Coe wrote:
> I'm ready to create packages, as a future-maintainer,
> to be handed to my sponsor to be uploaded.
>
> Should I set the debian version number to -1 (currently
> it's -0.6, never had an official maintainer), or should
> I continue using NMU numbering (i.e. -
to keep your mouth shut.
| (fortune)
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 01:53:13AM -0700, tony mancill écrivait:
> > dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or
> > directory
>
Can anyone give me a clue on where to look for this one? My rules file
has not changed (much), and now my package build gets almost to the end
and dies with:
dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or
directory
Any help would be appreciated.
TIA,
tony
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, David Coe wrote:
> So I think I'll create a source patch file
> and add a rule to debian/rules to apply it
> for each build. The alternative, of course,
> would be to just apply the patch once to
> the working source tree, and let the .deb
> system handle it.
>
> I think
Greetings mentors,
I maintain the wanpipe package, which is a set of utilities for use with
Sangoma WAN router cards. The binaries have to be compiled with a certain
version of the kernel. Moreover, the kernel patches required for the
drivers are not part of 2.0.36 or 2.0.37 (the package distrib
Hopefully this question isn't too dense, but I'm interested in seeing how
others handle this problem. I pointed my hamm system at an ftp server
carrying slink and updated my package list. Now dselect wants me to
update about 80MB of software on my system. This is ok, I guess, but I
happened to n
I've been studying the "Debian Packaging Manual" section 6.3, and I want
to make sure that I am interpreting it correctly.
My package contains a few conffiles which will be changing locations.
They are currently:
/etc/router.rc
/etc/router.conf
/usr/lib/router/interfaces/* -> ../../../var/wanpip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I have been working with the authors of wanpipe and have some assorted
goodies that I'd like to include into my Debian package. dpkg-buildsource
does like it when I just add the files to my source tree, I guess since
there is nothing to diff them against.
Shou
98 matches
Mail list logo
