Re: new pkg: libcrypt-simple-per

2005-12-19 Thread tony mancill
Just to make sure we're all talking about the same thing, Sandro, are you referring to this: http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Debian-Binary-Package-Building-HOWTO/ If so, I think you should have read the introduction more carefully, where the author states: "The intended use of such a newly created arc

Re: RFS: festvox-suopuhe-{mv,lj}: Finnish speakers for Festival

2006-01-09 Thread tony mancill
Sponsored. Thanks Niko. tony Niko Tyni wrote: > Hi, > > I'm reposting this since I didn't get any comments last time (a month > ago). These are quite simple packages. Please consider sponsoring > them. > > Name: festvox-suopuhe-lj > License: LGPL > ITP: #341964 > Description: Finnish female sp

Re: RFS: libcrypt-simple-perl

2006-01-15 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sponsored and uploaded to the archive. Thanks, tony Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hi all, > I'm here again in search for a sponsor for libcrypt-simple-perl . > Since the first request I've corrected some warning at build-time, > changed dependences in debian/

Re: RFS: distributed-net

2006-06-21 Thread tony mancill
I'll sponsor this. Cheers, tony On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:54:01PM -0400, James Stark wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "distributed-net". > > * Package name: distributed-net > Version : 2.9012.497-1 > Upstream Author : distributed.net > * URL

Re: changelog of debian policy?

2006-07-02 Thread tony mancill
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Hello Harri, > >> Is there a changelog of the Debian policy online? >> Actually I would have expected a pointer on >> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/, but maybe >> I am too blind to see. > > That depends on what information you need. If you're refering to the > p

Re: RFS: ace-of-penguins -- Solitaire-games with penguin-look

2006-07-02 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Uploaded. tony Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote: > * Sat 2006-07-01 jari.aalto AT cante.net (Jari Aalto+mail.linux) >> I'm looking for sponsor for followin package. Details below. >> >> ITA: ace-of-penguins -- Solitaire-games with penguin-look -BEGIN

Re: RFS: python-htmlgen -- library for the generation of HTML

2006-07-26 Thread tony mancill
Kevin Coyner wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the package 'python-htmlgen'. This is a great > little Python module that generates html pages on the fly. Sponsored. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: libnet-ping-external-perl (updated package)

2006-07-31 Thread tony mancill
Hello Eugene, I'm looking at your package now and agree to sponsor it. It appears that you've erased the changelog entry for the NMU of 0.11-0.1 which closed a couple of those bugs. Instead of removing that entry, I suggest that you leave it intact, and then request that the sponsor build with t

Re: RFS: xsysinfo

2006-08-11 Thread tony mancill
Sandro Tosi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7-4 > of my package "xsysinfo". uploaded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: mysql-navigator

2006-08-12 Thread tony mancill
Sandro Tosi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.2-8 > of my package "mysql-navigator". Uploaded. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: tstat

2006-08-20 Thread tony mancill
Sandro Tosi wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tstat". > > * Package name: tstat > Version : 1.01-1 > Upstream Author : Dario Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marco Mellia > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://tstat.tlc.polito.it/ > * Licens

Re: RFS: jzip -- Text mode interpreter for Z-Code adventures

2006-08-20 Thread tony mancill
Niko Tyni wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jzip > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Sponsored. tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Please tell if you found a sponsor

2006-08-26 Thread tony mancill
Bart Martens wrote: > On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 18:59 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: >> Dear package maintainers... >> >> a sponsor of Debian packages today sent an email to the mentors.debian.net >> support email address and I would like to forward the suggestion here. >> Please tell us if you found a

Re: RFS: wmmisc (updated package)

2006-08-28 Thread tony mancill
Sandro Tosi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-2 > of my package "wmmisc". Uploaded. Thanks, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: wmfishtime (updated package)

2006-08-28 Thread tony mancill
Sandro Tosi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.24-5 > of my package "wmfishtime". Sponsored. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: wmtz (updated package)

2006-08-29 Thread tony mancill
Sandro Tosi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-7 > of my package "wmtz". sponsored signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: wmdonkeymon (updated package)

2006-08-30 Thread tony mancill
Sandro Tosi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.91-3 > of my package "wmdonkeymon". sponsored signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: wmspaceweather (updated package)

2006-09-03 Thread tony mancill
Sandro Tosi wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.04-18 > of my package "wmspaceweather". sponsored signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Subject: RFS: c++-annotations

2006-09-07 Thread tony mancill
Hello George, I'm looking at this package. Here are a couple of comments so far: debian/control: * The package Architecture should be "all" instead of "any" - this will prevent the (identical) package from being built for every Debian architecture. * You can remove ${shlibs:Depends} from Depen

Re: my projects for debian ?

2006-09-17 Thread tony mancill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - pag - > The second program is pag - a password generator written in c. It can > generate numbers, > signs or both together, so 3 options. You can set the length of the password. > You can > generate just on password to stdout or a complete password list in a *.txt >

Re: question about reporting bugs on my own package

2006-09-18 Thread tony mancill
Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > Hi mentors, > > I have a problem with bug reporting. I maintain a package and found some > bugs with it. Is it correct way to report bugs on my own package, or should > I just fix these bugs and describe about it on changelog? I briefly read > Debian Developer's Reference,

Re: RFS: rpl -- intelligent recursive search/replace utility

2006-09-21 Thread tony mancill
Sponsored (but not yet uploaded). Kevin Coyner wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.4 > of my package "rpl". The package was recently orphaned. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: logwatch (temporary sponsor)

2006-09-27 Thread tony mancill
Sponsored. Cheers, tony Willi Mann wrote: > Hi! > > I'm searching for a temporary sponsor for logwatch 7.3.1-2. It's > available from > > http://pkg-logwatch.alioth.debian.org/apt/pool/main/l/logwatch/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: bbtime (updated package) [uploaded]

2006-10-07 Thread tony mancill
Kevin Coyner wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the updated version 0.1.5-10 > of my package "bbtime". It is lintian clean and builds fine in a > pbuilder sid chroot. uploaded to the archive Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: zim (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-10-11 Thread tony mancill
Emfox Zhou wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.16-1 > of my package "zim". zim_0.16 has been uploaded. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Subject: RFS: shc (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-10-18 Thread tony mancill
George Danchev wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.8.6-2 > of my package "shc". Uploaded to the archive. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: moc - ncurses based console audio player [sponsored]

2006-10-21 Thread tony mancill
Sponsored. By the way, I made one change to the package in debian/changelog; I modified bug number "#36452" to be "#364524". Regards, tony Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Hi all, > > could one please upload the new vwrsion of moc? > > moc (2.4.1-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * New upstream versi

Re: RFS: wormux (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-11-06 Thread tony mancill
This package is being uploaded to experimental now. (It takes a while for me to push 65MB.) Jean Parpaillon wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I've built new packages of Wormux. This is an alpha version of Wormux > upstream code so it should go to experimental distro. Is it possible ? > > It builds the

Re: RFS: radvd (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-11-09 Thread tony mancill
Uploaded to the archive. Thanks for updating the package (and for removing all of the {arch} stuff that was in the .diff.gz of the 0.8 version). Cheers, tony Andreas Rottmann wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.0-1 > of my package "radvd". > > It build

Re: RFS: zim (updated package) [sponsored]

2006-11-14 Thread tony mancill
This has been uploaded to the archive. Cheers, tony Emfox Zhou wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.17-1 > of my package "zim". signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFH: Need sponsor for debmirror [UPLOADED]

2007-01-28 Thread tony mancill
This has been uploaded to the archive. Cheers, tony Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for debmirror 20070123. Preferably someone > using it but anyone will do. > > MfG > Goswin > > http://mrvn.homeip.net/debmirror/ > > Format: 1.7 > Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007

Re: Better to run multiple configure/make cycles or use separate sources?

2007-02-19 Thread tony mancill
Another thing to realize is that the number of binary .debs generated from a source package is dictated by the contents of debian/control. Each "Package:" stanza indicates another binary .deb to be generated by the package. (Sorry if that's already been mentioned. I didn't see it, and couldn't t

Re: RFS: ripit

2007-06-18 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 the mental interface of > Elimar Riesebieter told: > >> Hi mentors, > [...] >> ripit (3.6.0-0) unstable; urgency=low > > Fixed to 3.6.0-1. > > Please notice, that I am looking for an uploader. This isn

Re: RFS: libj2ssh-java

2007-09-06 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Koch wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:47:43PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: >> (CC'ed to Debian Mentors). >> >> Dear Mentors, >> >> Myself and a friend have managed to package libj2ssh-java. >> >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/l

Re: RFS: nedit (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Tony Mancill
Hi Paul, I must have missed your previous email. I'm a long-time nedit user, and so am happy to see it continue to be supported. Give me a little time to get a few other things taken care of on my side and I'll review it and prepare an upload. Thank you, Tony On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:45 +0100,

Re: Building localy

2009-03-23 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hello mentors, > > Can somebody help me with this error please? > > $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S > is runnig fine... > > $ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -nc > giving me this error Any reason you're using sudo instead of -ffakeroot?

Re: RFS: prips (adopted and updated)

2009-03-27 Thread Tony Mancill
Uploaded. Feel free to contact me directly for subsequent uploads of this package. Thank you, Tony On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 19:46 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.5-1 > of my package "prips". I've adopted the Debian package, > and

Re: RFS: hexer (adopted & updated package)

2009-04-03 Thread Tony Mancill
Uploaded. You can contact me directly for future uploads of this package. On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 15:24 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:17:05AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > > > - dget > > > http://mentors.debi

Bug#690010: RFS: sweethome3d-furniture-editor/1.8-1 [ITP]

2012-10-10 Thread tony mancill
On 10/08/2012 04:25 PM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > Control: block 689980 by -1 > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sweethome3d-furniture-editor" Hi Gabriele, I am reviewing this package and will sponsor an upload

Bug#695588: RFS: jitsi/1.1.4365-1 [ITP]

2013-04-17 Thread tony mancill
On 03/15/2013 03:42 AM, Damian Minkov wrote: > Hi, > > we've just updated the package on mentors.debian.net following the > comments we recieved: > The dsc file can be found at: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jitsi/jitsi_2.0.4506.10553-1.dsc > > Regards > Damian Hello Damian, If

Bug#740035: RFS: sunflow and sweethome3d [DM but 1st upload to backports]

2014-02-24 Thread tony mancill
owner 740035 ! tags 740035 +pending thanks Hi Gabriele, I'm working on these. Thanks, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: freeplane - A Java program to create and edit mind maps

2010-07-19 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Eric, I have sponsored the upload. Please feel free to contact me directly for future uploads of freeplane. Regards, tony On 07/19/2010 01:15 AM, Eric Lavarde wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freeplane". > > *

Re: RFS: cpptasks (fwd to d-java@l.d.o)

2010-07-24 Thread Tony Mancill
Sponsored. Cheers, tony On 07/23/2010 05:35 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2010-07-24 00:29, Chris Baines wrote: >> Dear mentors, > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cpptasks". > >> * Package name: cpptasks >> Version : 1.0~b5-1 >> Upstream Author : Unknown >> * URL

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java

2010-08-08 Thread tony mancill
On 08/06/2010 07:58 AM, Rémi Debay wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "service-wrapper-java". > > * Package name : service-wrapper-java > Version : 3.5.3-1 > Upstream Author : Tanuki Software Ltd > * URL : http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/ > * License : GPLv

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java [2nd try]

2010-08-19 Thread tony mancill
Hi Remi, I'm still willing to sponsor the package and have looked at your changes - I've just been a little slow. I'll upload this weekend. Thank you, tony On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:46:19PM +0200, Rémi Debay wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "service-wrappe

Re: RFS: service-wrapper-java [2nd try]

2010-08-21 Thread tony mancill
Hello Remi, I have uploaded the package to experimental archive instead of unstable, just for the duration of the freeze. Please feel free to contact me directly for future uploads of this package, and thank you for your contribution to Debian. Cheers, tony On 08/19/2010 04:46 AM, Rémi Debay wr

updates to upstream packages

1998-06-16 Thread tony mancill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I have been working with the authors of wanpipe and have some assorted goodies that I'd like to include into my Debian package. dpkg-buildsource does like it when I just add the files to my source tree, I guess since there is nothing to diff them against. Shou

changing location of .conf files

1998-09-09 Thread tony mancill
I've been studying the "Debian Packaging Manual" section 6.3, and I want to make sure that I am interpreting it correctly. My package contains a few conffiles which will be changing locations. They are currently: /etc/router.rc /etc/router.conf /usr/lib/router/interfaces/* -> ../../../var/wanpip

using packages in slink

1998-09-15 Thread tony mancill
Hopefully this question isn't too dense, but I'm interested in seeing how others handle this problem. I pointed my hamm system at an ftp server carrying slink and updated my package list. Now dselect wants me to update about 80MB of software on my system. This is ok, I guess, but I happened to n

packages with kernel version dependencies

1999-07-07 Thread tony mancill
Greetings mentors, I maintain the wanpipe package, which is a set of utilities for use with Sangoma WAN router cards. The binaries have to be compiled with a certain version of the kernel. Moreover, the kernel patches required for the drivers are not part of 2.0.36 or 2.0.37 (the package distrib

Re: how best to maintain a patch

1999-07-30 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, David Coe wrote: > So I think I'll create a source patch file > and add a rule to debian/rules to apply it > for each build. The alternative, of course, > would be to just apply the patch once to > the working source tree, and let the .deb > system handle it. > > I think

things broke when I went to dpkg-dev 1.4.1.6

1999-08-16 Thread tony mancill
Can anyone give me a clue on where to look for this one? My rules file has not changed (much), and now my package build gets almost to the end and dies with: dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory Any help would be appreciated. TIA, tony [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: things broke when I went to dpkg-dev 1.4.1.6

1999-08-16 Thread tony mancill
to keep your mouth shut. | (fortune) On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 01:53:13AM -0700, tony mancill écrivait: > > dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list file: No such file or > > directory >

Re: debian version numbers for future-maintainers

1999-08-19 Thread tony mancill
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, David Coe wrote: > I'm ready to create packages, as a future-maintainer, > to be handed to my sponsor to be uploaded. > > Should I set the debian version number to -1 (currently > it's -0.6, never had an official maintainer), or should > I continue using NMU numbering (i.e. -

Re: binary package version numbers?

1999-09-11 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 02:20:07PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > We don't have a scheme which doesn't force other arches to > > rebuild beacuse of another arch build's mistake, right? > > I think that we use -2.0.1 , meaning "a recompile of -2". I'v

Re: Bug#49648: plib1: Where is -dev package?

1999-11-10 Thread tony mancill
On 9 Nov 1999, Falk Hueffner wrote: > [snip] > > > Hence, a program compiled with the Version 1 header will crash > > > if linked against the version 2 library. > [snip] > > > This makes distributing > > > binary programs very hard if the library is a '.so' because it's > > > very likely that the

Re: Devices and patches

2000-04-06 Thread tony mancill
Hi David, On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, David Fernandez Vaamonde wrote: > The program needs a patch to be applied to the kernel... How can you mark > this need in the package ? Should it be automatized? I went though this same thing with "wanipe" package. If the patch is stable, but unlikely to be part

Re: ITP and sponsor needed: texdoctk

2000-04-30 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I would like to package texdoctk for Debian and I'm looking for a sponsor. Hello Adrian, I'll be happy to sponsor this for you. Regards, tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Danger + Survival = Fun http://www.debian.org |(Neil Peart)

Re: How do I *really* get my GPGP key?

2000-05-04 Thread tony mancill
ook at the package. Regards, tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Race is not a competition http://www.debian.org | Sex is not a job description (Peart ->) | We hold these truths to be self-evident... On Thu, 4 May 2000, Bruce Korb wrote: > > Hi, > > The ins

Re: what creates a Packages{,.gz} etc. file ?

2000-05-05 Thread tony mancill
I did this same thing to setup a Debian mirror at work. If you look carefully, all you have to do is delete the existings Packages.gz files (since they are for a single CD) and mv Packages-cd.gz Packages.gz (do the same for the uncompressed packages). It's a lot easier if you do this with a find

Re: Linux Beginner

2000-05-13 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Jay Kelly wrote: > I am currently running Windows 2000 as my file server with three clients > running Windows 98. Can I replace the Windows 2000 server with Linux and > still have the Windows 98 clients log into the Linux server just as before? > Any help would be appreciated.

Re: is this RC?

2000-05-20 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, 21 May 2000, Christian Hammers wrote: > /home/gchavdarov/mysql32/mysql-3.22.32# dpkg-buildpackage > dpkg-buildpackage: source package is mysql > dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 3.22.32-1 > dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > debian/rules cle

Re: upload with name of sponsored person?

2000-08-23 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Joop Stakenborg wrote: > I am sponsoring drew parsons and would like to upload his packages > with only his entry in the changelog. Is that possible? > > My guess is that the package will be rejected because he is not > a debian maintainer yet Ah, finally something I

OT: Re: Sponsor's responsibilities

2000-09-16 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On 2915T060004-0700, Rick Younie wrote: > > Sponsee? Tony made that one up didn't he? I can see the > > confusion in a couple years when the number of Debian maintainers > > hits a few million. "What's that language you're speaking? > > D

the "right" way to handle caps in package/program names

2000-12-02 Thread tony mancill
I'm working on a package for ripperX, which comes in a ripperX_2.0 tarball and extracts itself into ripperX-2.0 directory, and produces a "ripperX" binary. When I left things as they were upstream, dh_make doesn't complain, but I get all kinds of problems actually trying to build the package. (dp

Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball

2001-01-07 Thread tony mancill
On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the pointer > to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild it. > > It should be the original file downloaded from the upstream author > without any changes so that the md5sum compares to an

Bug#838749: RFS: csvjdbc/1.0.31-1 [UPLOADED]

2016-09-24 Thread tony mancill
On 09/24/2016 02:27 AM, Christopher Hoskin wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear Mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "csvjdbc" Hi Christopher, Thank you for the update. Uploaded. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital sign

Re: Scala 2.10

2016-11-12 Thread tony mancill
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:39 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>I'm not in the Java packaging community, but from a little searching >>.m2 appears to be created by the Maven build system, and I know for >>sure there is software packaged in Debian that uses Maven, so maybe > >>you'd want to take a

Bug#784831: RFS: gnash/0.8.11~git20150419-1~bpo8+1 [1st upload to bpo]

2015-05-09 Thread tony mancill
On 05/09/2015 03:46 AM, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal Hi Gabriele, I have built against jessie-backports and uploaded the package. Thank you for the update. Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: freeplane (updated package)

2011-06-13 Thread tony mancill
On 06/08/2011 07:58 AM, Eric Lavarde wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.3-1 > of my package "freeplane". > > It builds these binary packages: > freeplane - Java program to create and edit mind maps. > libjortho-freeplane-java - Java spell-checking libra

Bug#934939: RFS: xlog/2.0.17-1

2019-08-17 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:12:02AM +0200, Ervin Hegedüs wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xlog" > > * Package name: xlog >Version : 2.0.17-1 >Upstream Author : Andy Stewart KB1OIQ >

Bug#934053: RFS: fwlogwatch/1.4-2

2019-08-22 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 10:12:08AM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > fwlogwatch (1.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium Hi William, Thank you for helping with fwlogwatch. I've taken a look at your updated package and things look really good. I not

Bug#1025274: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

2023-01-16 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html > Roberto, Tobias, thanks for your answers. > > I have removed MagicSFver2.sf2 from the package and adde

Bug#1025274: Bug#819332: License question about sf2 soundfont in Tuxguitar

2023-01-16 Thread tony mancill
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 08:33:07AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 10:02:55PM +0100, Helmar Gerloni wrote: > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2023/01/msg5.html > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2023/01/msg00097.html > > Rober

Bug#1029186: reply: RFS: libcommons-validator-java/1:1.7-1 [Team] -- ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules

2023-02-03 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 07:55:08AM +, min sun wrote: > > Hi mentors! > > I packaged new version of libcommons-validator [1] and uploaded again to > debian mentors[2], please refer to Upload #2 . Hi! I will review and sponsor the upload soon. Thank you for your contribution to Debian! C

Bug#1031123: RFS: libcommons-collections4-java/4.4-1 [Team] -- Apache Commons Collections - Extended Collections API for Java

2023-02-12 Thread tony mancill
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 03:43:05PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > Am 12.02.2023 um 07:54 teilte min sun mit: > > Hi, > > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > > following URL: > > > >https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcommons-collections4-java/ > > > If y

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-03 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Craig Small wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:10:48AM +0300, Shiju p. Nair wrote: > > Am currently mainatains two packages ( libnet-easytcp-perl & libmng ) > > both sponsored by Tony Mancil and am interested in adopting more > > orphaned packages. But Tony no longer responds

Re: dpkg-signpackage

2003-04-04 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:05:09PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote: > > I would like to sponsor a package of a friend > > > > the first time, I (of course) check the package > > (lintian, install it, etc etc) > > > > > > but what about the next times? what is the

Re: Excessive wait for DAM - something needs to be done

2003-07-16 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, David B Harris wrote: > Hardly. Every Debian Developer has the ability to run arbitrary code as > root on everybody's system. Do you want to try and make the argument > that regardless of whether the person has proved spiteful, unstable, > mean, and just generally a jackass ..

Re: Excessive wait for DAM - something needs to be done

2003-07-16 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, David B Harris wrote: > Hardly. Every Debian Developer has the ability to run arbitrary code as > root on everybody's system. Do you want to try and make the argument > that regardless of whether the person has proved spiteful, unstable, > mean, and just generally a jackass ..

Re: Custom package versioning

2001-04-17 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Amaya wrote: > At work, we are making custom Debian packages and we need a special > versioning system so that apt does not try to replace our package with > a newer upstream one. > > I would like to know if there's a standard way to proceed, apart from > setting the debian v

Re: Perl Packages

2001-08-25 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Martin Butterweck wrote: > I ITP some perl modules, is there something special I have to know about > packaging them ? Or are perl packages just like all other packages ? Please see the Perl Policy: http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/ Cheers, tony [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: upload packages

2002-04-17 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, pp wrote: > I make "Midgard CMS" packages from daily cvs. > We already have sid and woody packages. > Official existing packages do not work > properly , and there is no info from its maintainers > , so how may I uplod my packages? I would start by contacting the current De

Re: no arch debs

2002-04-20 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, David H. Askew wrote: > I am building some unofficial(for now) debs for jedit... and have > completed building them for the x86 arch .. and I got to thinking of > something... is it possible to build debs without a dependent arch? Hi David, if I understand correctly, all you

RE: Appeal to follow up on sponsor/advocate requests

2002-06-26 Thread tony mancill
FWIW, I typically respond via private email too. Perhaps we should resurrect http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ (which still functions, but seems to be outdated), or try using the RFS suggestion someone recently posted? On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > On 25-Ju

Re: File a bug against my own package?

2002-11-19 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > While testing a patch from upstream to fix a bug in my libxmltv-perl > package, I discovered another bug related to the package version > for libhtml-tableextract-perl (one XMLTV script requires 1.08, the > Debian version of the package is 1.06-2).

Re: Warning about Debian New Maintainer Application

2003-02-04 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Craig Small wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:10:48AM +0300, Shiju p. Nair wrote: > > Am currently mainatains two packages ( libnet-easytcp-perl & libmng ) > > both sponsored by Tony Mancil and am interested in adopting more > > orphaned packages. But Tony no longer responds

Re: dpkg-signpackage

2003-04-04 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:05:09PM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote: > > I would like to sponsor a package of a friend > > > > the first time, I (of course) check the package > > (lintian, install it, etc etc) > > > > > > but what about the next times? what is the

Re: The Debian Mentors Project

2003-05-12 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote: > Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM > +1000: > > *very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages > > uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to > > pu

Re: How do you upload/build sponsored packages?

2003-05-22 Thread tony mancill
Hi Jerome, I build like this: dpkg-buildpackge -rfakeroot -us -uc (actually, I use a little script called "dbuild" that tacks a $* on the end of the line in case I need to "dbuild -sa") Once the packages builds correctly and I've reviewed it, I use debsign [EMAIL PROTECTED] (

Re: upload with name of sponsored person?

2000-08-23 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Joop Stakenborg wrote: > I am sponsoring drew parsons and would like to upload his packages > with only his entry in the changelog. Is that possible? > > My guess is that the package will be rejected because he is not > a debian maintainer yet Ah, finally something

OT: Re: Sponsor's responsibilities

2000-09-16 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On 2915T060004-0700, Rick Younie wrote: > > Sponsee? Tony made that one up didn't he? I can see the > > confusion in a couple years when the number of Debian maintainers > > hits a few million. "What's that language you're speaking? > >

the "right" way to handle caps in package/program names

2000-12-02 Thread tony mancill
I'm working on a package for ripperX, which comes in a ripperX_2.0 tarball and extracts itself into ripperX-2.0 directory, and produces a "ripperX" binary. When I left things as they were upstream, dh_make doesn't complain, but I get all kinds of problems actually trying to build the package. (d

Re: different sizes for same upstream tarball

2001-01-07 Thread tony mancill
On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the pointer > to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild it. > > It should be the original file downloaded from the upstream author > without any changes so that the md5sum compares to a

Re: Custom package versioning

2001-04-17 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Amaya wrote: > At work, we are making custom Debian packages and we need a special > versioning system so that apt does not try to replace our package with > a newer upstream one. > > I would like to know if there's a standard way to proceed, apart from > setting the debian

Re: Perl Packages

2001-08-25 Thread tony mancill
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Martin Butterweck wrote: > I ITP some perl modules, is there something special I have to know about > packaging them ? Or are perl packages just like all other packages ? Please see the Perl Policy: http://people.debian.org/~bod/perl-policy/ Cheers, tony [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: no arch debs

2002-04-20 Thread tony mancill
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, David H. Askew wrote: > I am building some unofficial(for now) debs for jedit... and have > completed building them for the x86 arch .. and I got to thinking of > something... is it possible to build debs without a dependent arch? Hi David, if I understand correctly, all yo

Re: File a bug against my own package?

2002-11-19 Thread tony mancill
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > While testing a patch from upstream to fix a bug in my libxmltv-perl > package, I discovered another bug related to the package version > for libhtml-tableextract-perl (one XMLTV script requires 1.08, the > Debian version of the package is 1.06-2).