Hi Mentors,
I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
crystalcursors
+ http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crystalcursors.html
+ http://venthur.de/debian/crystalcursors/
closes: #328298 (Hot Point of Lefthanded Themes Wrong)
kde-icons-nuovext
+ http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kde-icons-nu
On Saturday 15 October 2005 14:59, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
>
> crystalcursors
> + http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crystalcursors.html
> + http://venthur.de/debian/crystalcursors/
> closes: #328298 (Hot Point of Lefthanded Themes Wrong)
Notes for
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 14:59, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
>>
>> crystalcursors
>> + http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crystalcursors.html
>> + http://venthur.de/debian/crystalcursors/
>> closes: #328298 (Hot Point of Left
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:47:26 +0200
Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - a lot of commented-out debhelper calls in debian/rules
>
> Hmm, this is rather cosmetical, isn't it?
Is not only cosmetics, is also disk space and bandwidth for holding
useless stuff.
--
Ricardo Mones
~
On 15-Oct-2005, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > - a lot of commented-out debhelper calls in debian/rules
>
> Hmm, this is rather cosmetical, isn't it?
It's poor style, which more than cosmetics is also distraction and a
waste of every reader's time. There is no downside to re
Ricardo Mones wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:47:26 +0200
> Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > - a lot of commented-out debhelper calls in debian/rules
>>
>> Hmm, this is rather cosmetical, isn't it?
>
> Is not only cosmetics, is also disk space and bandwidth for holding
> usel
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:21:06 +0200
Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The difference in *bytes* is exactly 338 -- this is ~5-10 times smaller
> than the size of *one* single cursor contained in this package.
Your package being big is no excuse to make it bigger without need to,
better
On Saturday 15 October 2005 22:47, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 October 2005 14:59, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> I'm searching for sponsorship of my packages:
> >>
> >> crystalcursors
> >> + http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crystalcursors.html
> >> + http://vent
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 22:47, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> > - a lot of commented-out debhelper calls in debian/rules
>>
>> Hmm, this is rather cosmetical, isn't it?
>
> Mostly. But the template is merely there as a superset of things you could
> possibly need. It doesn'
Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:21:06 +0200
> Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The difference in *bytes* is exactly 338 -- this is ~5-10 times smaller
> > than the size of *one* single cursor contained in this package.
>
> Your package being bi
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 22:47, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> > Hmm, this is rather cosmetical, isn't it?
>
> Mostly. But the template is merely there as a superset of things you could
> possibly need. It doesn't do any harm to leave it in there. And I d
On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 13:53:11 -0400
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:21:06 +0200
> > Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > The difference in *bytes* is exactly 338 -- this is ~5-10 times smaller
> >
Ricardo Mones wrote:
>
>> I have lots of commented-out debhelper lines which sometimes later get
>> used when upstream does add a relevant file.
>>
>> If you like things all prim and proper, that's fine, but please don't
>> impose it on others.
>
> I think the one who should take a break is
On 16-Oct-2005, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Oh my god, give the guy a break!
We are. He's come here asking for feedback on his package; we're
informing him of acceptable style.
> If this offends you, then make it into policy! Debian is not a
> police state!
Policy is also advisory. No-one is for
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16-Oct-2005, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Oh my god, give the guy a break!
>
> We are. He's come here asking for feedback on his package; we're
> informing him of acceptable style.
Actually, he was asking for a sponsored upload, not feedback on his
pack
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 14:59, Bastian Venthur wrote:
[...]
>> kde-icons-nuovext
>> + http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kde-icons-nuovext.html
>> + http://venthur.de/debian/nuovext/
>> closes: #324505 (Includes text files under /usr/share/icons)
>
> Notes for kde-i
Hi, Bastian...
regarding kde-icons-nuovext...
On Monday 17 October 2005 13:10, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > - it may be a matter of taste but I would not extract the upstream
> > tarball right into the debian/... directory. Why not using that file
> > as an *.orig.tar.gz
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Hi, Bastian...
>
> regarding kde-icons-nuovext...
>
> On Monday 17 October 2005 13:10, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Christoph Haas wrote:
>> > - it may be a matter of taste but I would not extract the upstream
>> > tarball right into the debian/... directory. Why not using
On Monday 17 October 2005 18:00, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Okay. Just keep in mind that you cannot change the orig.tar.gz which
> > is currently in Debian. You can only provide new *.diff.gz files for
> > the same upstream tarball. So it's more a todo when your upstream
> >
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Yes, that sounds like a rather good idea. Doesn't look too ugly and tricks
> the version comparison system. :) If you don't know it already... see the
> man page for "dpkg". There is a nice option called "--compare-versions"
> which allows you to find out whether a revision
On Monday 17 October 2005 21:36, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > I suggest you rather use dh_installchangelogs for that. Please see its
> > man page. (That means also removing the debian/docs file.)
>
> The general problem here is, that upstream sometimes provides the
> filenames
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Monday 17 October 2005 21:36, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Christoph Haas wrote:
>> > I suggest you rather use dh_installchangelogs for that. Please see its
>> > man page. (That means also removing the debian/docs file.)
>>
>> The general problem here is, that upstream some
On Monday 17 October 2005 23:15, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Hehe, I guess my package is relatively perfect (and uploaded) now ;)
The $(CURDIR) is redundant in dh_installchangelogs. But I won't harass
you with that any more. :)
> But one last question. What if upstream provides a README, which want
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Monday 17 October 2005 23:15, Bastian Venthur wrote:
>> Hehe, I guess my package is relatively perfect (and uploaded) now ;)
>
> The $(CURDIR) is redundant in dh_installchangelogs. But I won't harass
> you with that any more. :)
>
>> But one last question. What if upst
24 matches
Mail list logo
