On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> not a reason for rejection
Not being willing to sponsor the package isn't a rejection, just an
indicator that I don't have time for a proper initial review and
ongoing sponsorship. My mail was part quick review for things you
might want to
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 at 18:03:41 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> The source package should not be a native source package as netmask
> isn't Debian specific.
It has however (to my surprise as well) been a native package since its
integration to Debian in 1999. Just made it non-native as you
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 10:28 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "netmask"
I don't intend to sponsor this but here are some thoughts:
The source package should not be a native source package as netmask
isn't Debian specific.
Are buildflags.mk and
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "netmask"
* Package name: netmask
Version : 2.4.0
Upstream Author : Robert Stone
* URL : https://github.com/talby-/netmask
* License
4 matches
Mail list logo