Hi Gianfranco,
Le 16/05/2016 15:16, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> Hi Eric,
>
> nice indeed, so please wait some more time, and ping me back in 7-15 days if
> nobody
> picked up the work in the meanwhile.
>
>
Iain R. Learmonth has uploaded gnustep-make.
Thanks to you for helping me to
oops ! accidentally removed gsdh_gnustep symlinks !
Fixed and reuploaded
add this line to changelog
* Provide a new debian/gnustep-make.links.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnustep-make
or
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-make/gnustep-make_2.6.8-1.dsc
Hi
Le 17/05/2016 11:52, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
>
>
> Depends: gnustep-common (>= ${source:Version}),
> gnustep-common (<< ${source:Version}.1~),
> gobjc,
> -autotools-dev,
> ${misc:Depends},
> -${gnustep:Depends}
> +${perl:Depends}
> +Replaces: gnustep-common (<<
Le 17/05/2016 19:27, Eric Heintzmann a écrit :
> Hi,
> Reuploaded !
https://mentors.debian.net/package/gnustep-make
or
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnustep-make/gnustep-make_2.6.8-1.dsc
Updated changelog:
gnustep-make (2.6.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Team
Hi,
Reuploaded !
Le 17/05/2016 18:58, Eric Heintzmann a écrit :
>
>
> Le 17/05/2016 11:52, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>> switch to autoreconf done
>>
>> nice!
>>
>> little nitpick before answering to the open points:
>> * debian/patches/manpage-spelling-errors.patch: New, fix two
Le 17/05/2016 11:52, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> Hi,
>> switch to autoreconf done
>
>
> nice!
>
> little nitpick before answering to the open points:
> * debian/patches/manpage-spelling-errors.patch: New, fix two spelling
> +
> errors.
>
>
> there is a new space in changelog
>
Hi,
>switch to autoreconf done
nice!
little nitpick before answering to the open points:
* debian/patches/manpage-spelling-errors.patch: New, fix two spelling
+
errors.
there is a new space in changelog
(pull-debian-source gnustep-make debdiff of the two dsc files, filterdiff the
debian
Hi,
Le 16/05/2016 21:15, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> Hi Eric,
>
>
> As you wish, you can switch in a later upload, or do it now and maybe
> fix/revert in case of troubles
switch to autoreconf done
> I don't think so, but I can review a patch/package, because some lines
> without their
Hi Gianfranco,
Le 16/05/2016 21:15, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> Hi Eric,
>
>
>> I think there are too many changes in this release.
>> Is it okay to remove autoreconf for now,
>> and replace autotools-dev by autoreconf at next release ?
>
> it is, just a side note: I never had issues with
Hi Eric,
>I think there are too many changes in this release.
>Is it okay to remove autoreconf for now,
>and replace autotools-dev by autoreconf at next release ?
it is, just a side note: I never had issues with that move, and in general
issues
arises when: the configure/Makefiles are
Le 16/05/2016 15:16, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> Hi Eric,
>
>
>
>> Well autotools-dev already used. No changes here.
>> About autoreconf, I'm not familiar with it.
>> I installed it to test it. Since all seems ok, I've not removed it.
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Autoreconf
>
> I was
Hi Eric,
>Well autotools-dev already used. No changes here.
>About autoreconf, I'm not familiar with it.
>I installed it to test it. Since all seems ok, I've not removed it.
https://wiki.debian.org/Autoreconf
I was talking more about removing autotools-dev
>In addition, I've just asked
>> also, the control.in file removal is not documented I guess
> Yes, this is a consequence of the debian/rules rewriting.
I mean I've removed control target in debian/rules file,
thus I removed control.in which was not needed any longer.
Thanks
Eric
Le 16/05/2016 12:40, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Eric, some questions on the changes:
> 1) why do you need both autotools-dev and autoreconf?
Well autotools-dev already used. No changes here.
About autoreconf, I'm not familiar with it.
I installed it to
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Eric, some questions on the changes:
1) why do you need both autotools-dev and autoreconf?
2) did you get an ack from maintainers to add yourself as uploader
3) +Replaces: gnustep-common (<< 2.6.8-1)
this is something I don't understand.
also, the control.in file
Le 15/05/2016 03:26, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 03:04:37AM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
>> Le 15/05/2016 02:46, Adam Borowski a écrit :
>>> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-make"
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 03:04:37AM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
> Le 15/05/2016 02:46, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-make"
> >>
> >> * Package name: gnustep-make
> >>
Le 15/05/2016 02:46, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-make"
>>
>> * Package name: gnustep-make
>>Version : 2.6.8-1
>>
>> dget -x
>>
Hi!
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-make"
>
> * Package name: gnustep-make
>Version : 2.6.8-1
>
> dget -x
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnustep-make"
* Package name: gnustep-make
Version : 2.6.8-1
Upstream Author : GNUstep Maintainer
* URL :
20 matches
Mail list logo