"SC" == Seth Cohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
SC> Sorry if my previous reply reads like a flame, that wasn't my intention.
SC> I've been reading the back and forth you've had with others over the
SC> BTS so far, unhappily. Maybe new maintainers need a good lesson in
SC> the use of the
Hey Christian,
this guy is doing you a *favor*, and you are being rude to him.
If the bug is upstream, then it should be easy for you to know
if you have corrected it when you packaged the stuff. Then you
can close the bug with explanation: corrected in patch xx, which
was forwarded upstream 2000
At 05:56 PM 08/02/2000 +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
I've said that in a reply :
***
Sorry, but use *Debian* package not *Helix* package.
If can't accept bug against a non Debian package.
Install the Debian package and remake t
On 2 Aug 2000, Christian Marillat wrote:
> CCC> I'd forward it upstream, personally. In other words, file it as a bug
> CCC> with the Helix folk and mark it as forwarded in our BTS.
>
> I just discovered the Helix BTS.
Yeah, I had the URL ready in case you didn't have it yet.
> This problem i
"CCC" == Christopher C Chimelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
CCC> I'd forward it upstream, personally. In other words, file it as a bug
CCC> with the Helix folk and mark it as forwarded in our BTS.
I just discovered the Helix BTS.
CCC> I would recommend checking the Debian package fo
"SC" == Seth Cohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
SC> Sorry if my previous reply reads like a flame, that wasn't my intention.
SC> I've been reading the back and forth you've had with others over the
SC> BTS so far, unhappily. Maybe new maintainers need a good lesson in
SC> the use of th
Hey Christian,
this guy is doing you a *favor*, and you are being rude to him.
If the bug is upstream, then it should be easy for you to know
if you have corrected it when you packaged the stuff. Then you
can close the bug with explanation: corrected in patch xx, which
was forwarded upstream 200
At 05:56 PM 08/02/2000 +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>I've said that in a reply :
>
>***
>Sorry, but use *Debian* package not *Helix* package.
>
>If can't accept bug against a non Debian package.
>
>Install the Debian package and r
On 2 Aug 2000, Christian Marillat wrote:
> CCC> I'd forward it upstream, personally. In other words, file it as a bug
> CCC> with the Helix folk and mark it as forwarded in our BTS.
>
> I just discovered the Helix BTS.
Yeah, I had the URL ready in case you didn't have it yet.
> This problem
"CCC" == Christopher C Chimelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
CCC> I'd forward it upstream, personally. In other words, file it as a bug
CCC> with the Helix folk and mark it as forwarded in our BTS.
I just discovered the Helix BTS.
CCC> I would recommend checking the Debian package f
On 2 Aug 2000, Christian Marillat wrote:
> This is the 3th bugs against Helix package in our BTS.
>
> I close these bug without reading them.
>
> But for one I've some problem (bug 68343).
>
> This bug has been closed 2 times and reopen 2 times. Here is the latest
> reopen:
>
> What I need t
Christian, I've watched the exchange between you and others on the devel
list, and I have to say that you aren't seeming to listen to the feedback
you got so far about maintaining and the BTS. I'm not surprised to see a
bugreport war starting.
1) You chose to become a maintainer. That implies t
Hi,
This is the 3th bugs against Helix package in our BTS.
I close these bug without reading them.
But for one I've some problem (bug 68343).
This bug has been closed 2 times and reopen 2 times. Here is the latest reopen:
What I need to do ?
***
On 2 Aug 2000, Christian Marillat wrote:
> This is the 3th bugs against Helix package in our BTS.
>
> I close these bug without reading them.
>
> But for one I've some problem (bug 68343).
>
> This bug has been closed 2 times and reopen 2 times. Here is the latest reopen:
>
> What I need to
Christian, I've watched the exchange between you and others on the devel
list, and I have to say that you aren't seeming to listen to the feedback
you got so far about maintaining and the BTS. I'm not surprised to see a
bugreport war starting.
1) You chose to become a maintainer. That implies
Hi,
This is the 3th bugs against Helix package in our BTS.
I close these bug without reading them.
But for one I've some problem (bug 68343).
This bug has been closed 2 times and reopen 2 times. Here is the latest reopen:
What I need to do ?
**
16 matches
Mail list logo
