On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:19:34 -0500
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
> > it.
>
> I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself
> included, read changelogs constantly, and it is important for them
Matt,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:19:34AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:02:27AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> > Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
> > it.
> I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself included,
>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:02:27AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
> it.
I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself included,
read changelogs constantly, and it is important for them to be useful and
inform
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:45AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related problem,
> that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl (>=1.08-1),
> or should I just track this on my own?
A good rule of thumb is
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:19:34 -0500
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
> > it.
>
> I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself
> included, read changelogs constantly, and it is important for them
Matt,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:19:34AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:02:27AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> > Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
> > it.
> I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself included,
>
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:02:27AM +0100, Simon Richter wrote:
> Well, the changelog doesn't really matter, as few people ever look at
> it.
I strongy object to both of these assertions. Developers, myself included,
read changelogs constantly, and it is important for them to be useful and
inform
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:45AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related problem,
> that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl (>=1.08-1),
> or should I just track this on my own?
A good rule of thumb is
ge is 1.06-2). I've filed a bug against
> libhtml-tableextract-perl requesting that the new upstream version be
> packaged.
>
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
> problem, that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl
> (>=1.08
ge is 1.06-2). I've filed a bug against
> libhtml-tableextract-perl requesting that the new upstream version be
> packaged.
>
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
> problem, that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl
> (>=1.08
> OTOH, the BTS can serve as a todo list, which is why I regularly file
> bugs against my own packages. This is especially useful when you hand
> over the package later and haven't done everything you wanted to do
> (for lack of time or sth.), the new maintainer will then have an idea
> of what you
Kenneth,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:45AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
> problem, that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl
> (>=1.08-1), or should I just track this on my own? I'm think
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
It's up to you...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where th
> OTOH, the BTS can serve as a todo list, which is why I regularly file
> bugs against my own packages. This is especially useful when you hand
> over the package later and haven't done everything you wanted to do
> (for lack of time or sth.), the new maintainer will then have an idea
> of what you
-perl requesting that the new upstream version be
packaged.
Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
problem, that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl
(>=1.08-1), or should I just track this on my own? I'm thinking it
would be nice to have a ch
Kenneth,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:45AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
> problem, that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl
> (>=1.08-1), or should I just track this on my own? I'm think
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
It's up to you...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where th
-perl requesting that the new upstream version be
packaged.
Should I file a bug against my own package to report the related
problem, that libxmltv-perl should depend on libhtml-tableextract-perl
(>=1.08-1), or should I just track this on my own? I'm thinking it
would be nice to have a ch
18 matches
Mail list logo
