Gregor Jasny writes:
> I'm the maintainer of the libv4l package. It produces two binary
> packages: libv4l-0 and libv4l-dev.
> With the latest release upstream decided to rename it to v4l-utils and
> add some utilities.
> To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to
> v4l
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:57:07 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >> To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to
> >> v4l-utils.
> >> But what actions do I have to take to take to replace libv4l with
> >> v4l-utils in the archive?
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
> I
On 2010-03-02 11:14 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:10:59 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote:
>
>> To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to
>> v4l-utils.
>> But what actions do I have to take to take to replace libv4l with
>> v4l-utils in the archive?
>
>
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:10:59 +0100, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to v4l-utils.
> But what actions do I have to take to take to replace libv4l with
> v4l-utils in the archive?
http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
Cheers,
gregor
--
Hello,
I'm the maintainer of the libv4l package. It produces two binary
packages: libv4l-0 and libv4l-dev.
With the latest release upstream decided to rename it to v4l-utils and
add some utilities.
To be consistent with upstream I changes the package source name to v4l-utils.
But what actions do
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 02:29:26PM -0800, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 11:09:07PM +0100, Jordi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 01:03:01PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > > well since it is so new, perhaps you should request it be removed
> > > (release critical bug on ftp
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 11:09:07PM +0100, Jordi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 01:03:01PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > well since it is so new, perhaps you should request it be removed
> > (release critical bug on ftp.debian.org) and upload a new package.
> > Realize that the new package
On 11-Jan-2000 Jordi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 01:03:01PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>> well since it is so new, perhaps you should request it be removed (release
>> critical bug on ftp.debian.org) and upload a new package. Realize that the
>> new
>> package will be treated as a com
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 01:03:01PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> well since it is so new, perhaps you should request it be removed (release
> critical bug on ftp.debian.org) and upload a new package. Realize that the
> new
> package will be treated as a completely new package.
Wow, but isn
On 10-Jan-2000 Jordi wrote:
> Hello!
>
> If you remember, I packaged tip (which made it into Potato this night), but
> there was a namespace problem with it, as there is an net app with the same
> name, although not included in Debian.
>
> Upstream maintainer decided to rename to NANO, so I need
Hello!
If you remember, I packaged tip (which made it into Potato this night), but
there was a namespace problem with it, as there is an net app with the same
name, although not included in Debian.
Upstream maintainer decided to rename to NANO, so I need to change the
package name now. I haven't
On Fri, May 01, 1998 at 05:34:16PM -0400, Shaleh wrote:
> You are free to call it what you want. In this case iplogger is how
> most people expect to see it anyway.
Right. If you decide to call it iplogger-ident you should
make it Replace, Conflict and Provides iplogger.
Regards,
Joey
You are free to call it what you want. In this case iplogger is how
most people expect to see it anyway.
Hugo Haas wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> The new upstream maintainer of iplogger has released the new version
> using the name iplogger-ident 1.1 (because the difference between
> version 1.0 and 1.1 is
Hi.
The new upstream maintainer of iplogger has released the new version
using the name iplogger-ident 1.1 (because the difference between
version 1.0 and 1.1 is the presence of an identity check function).
Anyway, I consider this new version as being iplogger 1.1, and the
author just wants to un
14 matches
Mail list logo
