-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 18.08.2011 18:26, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> While you are at it: can you also make clickable the URL of the
> project homepage that appears in this field (my package just used as
> an example):
>
> Info:Homepage: https://github.com/qnikst/k
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 05:13:42PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> I fixed that. Actually the problem was, that the watch-file plugin
> checked the wrong exit status and thought uscan failed. The new
> (correct) behavior is, not to display uscan output at all, unless there
> was a problem with it.
>
> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stanislav,
On 18.08.2011 15:57, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> For some reason, the report of uscan is shown as a "Warning:",
> however, there is actually nothing to be warned about in it: it just
> says that the package is found on upstream's websit
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:13:04AM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> I agree that this is a bug. I just filed a bug report:
>
> https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=313293&group_id=100127&atid=413115
>
> We're working through issues and making reasonably good progress.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-08-11 10:50, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
>
> Okay!
>
> As of Thu Aug 11 08:47:29 UTC 2011, mentors.debian.net now runs the
> Debexpo code.
thanks to asheesh (with big cheers) for doing all the work.
i really appreciate it.
i believe that the few
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:50:42AM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
As of Thu Aug 11 08:47:29 UTC 2011, mentors.debian.net now runs the
Debexpo code.
FTP upload should be working. There is a cron job that looks for
FTP-based uploads every 30 minutes.
Excerpts from Stanislav Maslovski's message of Sat Aug 13 06:12:53 -0400 2011:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:48:31PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > I guess, the HTTP-based method does not have this absurd 30 minutes
> > long delay... Trying to login and sort things out...
>
> Noticed one mor
On 14/08/11 at 17:07 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> Well, then it is a shame that the system has not been given even a
> slight test since all these years...
On 14/08/11 at 17:18 +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> You shold have asked for external testing and help *BEFORE* switching
> mentor
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 04:34:17PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 14.08.2011 15:18, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > But *you* provided the function in the web interface to delete the
> > uploaded package.
>
> FTR: I didn't.
That "you" above supposed to mean "people who care about debexpo and
t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Stanislav,
On 14.08.2011 15:18, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> But *you* provided the function in the web interface to delete the
> uploaded package.
FTR: I didn't.
> You shold have asked for external testing and help *BEFORE* switching
> mentors.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:57:30PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Andrew Starr-Bochicchio writes:
>
> > I've always been told (and it has been repeatedly mentioned on this
> > very list) that packages should only bump their version numbers for
> > versions that actually entered the official archives.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 01:51:45PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> In fact, until very recently we had no support to upload the same source
> package several times at all, so the status quo is already an
> improvement. As far as I can tell, there are the following problems with
> (multiple) uploads of th
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 01:00:50PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> > ... still points to old package!
> > Seems like the transition to the new system was done in a hurry...
>
> One could argue, this is by design. It is not supported to re-upload a
> new package with the same Debian version to official a
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio writes:
> I've always been told (and it has been repeatedly mentioned on this
> very list) that packages should only bump their version numbers for
> versions that actually entered the official archives.
There are some sponsors who prefer what you say here, and there are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14.08.2011 13:37, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> That seems like a very bad design decision for a site dedicate to the
> iterative process of review then.
I sort of agree, although I wasn't involved at all in this part of Expo.
We certainly acce
On 2011-08-14 07:37, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> That seems like a very bad design decision for a site dedicate to the
> iterative process of review then. I've always been told (and it has
> been repeatedly mentioned on this very list) that packages should only
> bump their version numbers for
> On 13.08.2011 18:16, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
>> ... still points to old package!
>
> One could argue, this is by design. It is not supported to re-upload a
> new package with the same Debian version to official archives either.
That seems like a very bad design decision for a site dedicate to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 13.08.2011 18:16, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> ... still points to old package!
> Seems like the transition to the new system was done in a hurry...
One could argue, this is by design. It is not supported to re-upload a
new package with the sa
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 03:18:06PM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Another problem I see, is that if I upload a package (with the same version)
> twice, the second upload gets ignored. Even if I delete the package, and
> then re-upload it, I see only the first upload. The old mentors updated th
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 02:12:53PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:48:31PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> > I guess, the HTTP-based method does not have this absurd 30 minutes
> > long delay... Trying to login and sort things out...
>
> Noticed one more thing on
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:48:31PM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> I guess, the HTTP-based method does not have this absurd 30 minutes
> long delay... Trying to login and sort things out...
Noticed one more thing on the page with the information about the
uploaded package (look below for the t
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:50:42AM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> As of Thu Aug 11 08:47:29 UTC 2011, mentors.debian.net now runs the
> Debexpo code.
>
> FTP upload should be working. There is a cron job that looks for
> FTP-based uploads every 30 minutes. This provides compatibility with
> the /e
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Ben Finney wrote:
Asheesh Laroia writes:
* I'm importing all the data onto expo.debian.net over the next day.
[…]
Here's what to expect, by the end of Thu Aug 11:
Please note times in UTC, so users around the globe can know when you
mean :-)
Okay!
As of Thu Aug 11
Asheesh Laroia writes:
> * I'm importing all the data onto expo.debian.net over the next day.
[…]
> Here's what to expect, by the end of Thu Aug 11:
Please note times in UTC, so users around the globe can know when you
mean :-)
(This also goes for any announcements you make on the websites
the
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi Asheesh,
[...]
If you upload a new package to mentors.debian.net before the end of
Thu Aug 11, then your package might get lost. If you find that's the
case, just re-upload it.
Couldn't you put a big fat banner on mentors.debian.net during
Hi Asheesh,
[...]
>
> If you upload a new package to mentors.debian.net before the end of
> Thu Aug 11, then your package might get lost. If you find that's the
> case, just re-upload it.
>
Couldn't you put a big fat banner on mentors.debian.net during migration time?
I've noticed that there is
Hi all debian-mentors people,
The Debexpo code is just about ready for prime-time. We're doing the
migration now.
Here's the plans for mentors.debian.net's migration onto newer software
called debexpo:
* I'm importing all the data onto expo.debian.net over the next day.
* Once Christoph Ha
27 matches
Mail list logo
