Hi all,
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate
package. Usually packages keep really old versioned dependencies - this
might be important
Hi all,
in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate
package. Usually packages keep really old versioned dependencies - this
might be important
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 19:27, Frank KÃster wrote:
> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
> dependency on that.
*snip*
> If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required,
>
(Policy 3.5).
You are req
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
> dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate
> package. Usually packages kee
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
>> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
>> dependency on that. However, in woody sta
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:26:24AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
> >> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils -
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
> > stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
> > dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate
> > package. Usually packages keep really
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) schrieb:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Frank Küster wrote:
>> > If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required, I would just add
>> > "coreutils | stat" to the dependencies. What should I do in this case?
>> > Stat was in coreutils from the first time it appeared in Deb
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
> You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
> marked Essential: yes).
But "you ar not required" doesn't mean "you are not allowed".
So what would be wrong with depending on "coreutils | stat"?
Ciao,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:54:17PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
[...]
> BTW: Since I posted to this ML (and debian-devel), I get more mail
> worms than my mailbox at my ISP can hold. Strange for linux developer
> MLs...
The MLs are mirrored to usenet, and recent worms (Swen) search the
local mailfolde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eike Sauer) schrieb:
> Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
>> You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
>> marked Essential: yes).
>
> But "you ar not required" doesn't mean "you are not allowed".
> So what would be wron
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:55, Eike Sauer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
> > You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
> > marked Essential: yes).
>
> But "you ar not required" doesn't mean "you are not allowed".
> So what wou
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 19:27, Frank Küster wrote:
> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
> dependency on that.
*snip*
> If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required,
>
(Policy 3.5).
You are req
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
> dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate
> package. Usually packages kee
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
>> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
>> dependency on that. However, in woody sta
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:26:24AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:27:28PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
> >> stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils -
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > in a package that I maintain (sponsored by a DD), I use a call to
> > stat. In sarge, /usr/bin/stat is in coreutils - of course I don't need a
> > dependency on that. However, in woody stat was in a separate
> > package. Usually packages keep really
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) schrieb:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Frank Küster wrote:
>> > If coreutils wouldn't be of priority required, I would just add
>> > "coreutils | stat" to the dependencies. What should I do in this case?
>> > Stat was in coreutils from the first time it appeared in Deb
Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
> You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
> marked Essential: yes).
But "you ar not required" doesn't mean "you are not allowed".
So what would be wrong with depending on "coreutils | stat"?
Ciao,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:54:17PM +0100, Eike Sauer wrote:
[...]
> BTW: Since I posted to this ML (and debian-devel), I get more mail
> worms than my mailbox at my ISP can hold. Strange for linux developer
> MLs...
The MLs are mirrored to usenet, and recent worms (Swen) search the
local mailfolde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eike Sauer) schrieb:
> Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
>> You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
>> marked Essential: yes).
>
> But "you ar not required" doesn't mean "you are not allowed".
> So what would be wron
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 10:55, Eike Sauer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 2. November 2003 20:56 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
> > You are not required to list dependencies on 'Essential' packages (those
> > marked Essential: yes).
>
> But "you ar not required" doesn't mean "you are not allowed".
> So what wou
22 matches
Mail list logo
