On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only
to linux and kfreebsd and exclude hurd-i386 architecture?
I changed Architecture Field from any to linux-any.
kfreebsd is not linux so setting linux-any you excluded it.
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:35:43PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only
to linux and kfreebsd and exclude hurd-i386 architecture?
I changed Architecture Field from any to
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:53:33AM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:35:43PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only
to linux and kfreebsd and exclude
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:48:39AM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:53:33AM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
The original problem was that fuse-utils wasn't available on kfreebsd
The problem was not in kfreebsd but in hurd-i386.
I have the slight feeling we're
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:26:02PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:48:39AM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 08:53:33AM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
The original problem was that fuse-utils wasn't available on kfreebsd
The problem
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:48:59PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:26:02PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
You should also check your changelog, beside closing a bug which
isn't fixed with arch kfreebsd-any the changelog only states the change from
any to
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:29:31PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:48:59PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:26:02PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
You should also check your changelog, beside closing a bug which
isn't fixed with arch
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 03:36:46PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
Re-uploaded to mentors.d.n
Uploaded to the archive.
Sven
--
And I don't know much, but I do know this:
With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.
[ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 03:07:56PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 03:36:46PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
Re-uploaded to mentors.d.n
Uploaded to the archive.
Thank you very much for your time and effort in helping
and sponsoring this package.
Sven
--
And I
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-2
of my package archivemount.
It builds these binary packages:
archivemount - mounts an archive for access as a file system
The upload would fix these bugs: 613119
The package is lintian clean (Lintian v2.5.0~rc3) but it not
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:07:55PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
Hi,
The package is lintian clean (Lintian v2.5.0~rc3) but it not reports
(post pbuilder build, lintian 2.5.0 but that shouldn't make a big
difference for those warnings)
$ lintian -iIv archivemount_0.6.1-2_i386.changes
N:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 09:39:57PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
The first one is the config.sub replacement. What about using something
like the following for your configure target:
set -e; if ! [ -f config/config.sub.backup ]; then \
mv config/config.sub config/config.sub.backup; \
ln
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 09:39:57PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 06:07:55PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
Hi,
The package is lintian clean (Lintian v2.5.0~rc3) but it not reports
(post pbuilder build, lintian 2.5.0 but that shouldn't make a big
difference for
13 matches
Mail list logo
