Re: RFS: dnscruft

2006-05-12 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:45:15PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote: > >On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 01:09:40AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > >>Let's say that the previous post contained some references about the > >>sites this package blocks. If I made murphy autolearn the package's > >>name to mark it as spam,

Re: RFS: dnscruft

2006-05-12 Thread Joe Smith
"Adam Borowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Also, the word "dnscruft" has a spam ratio of no more than 50% (due to the recent ITP), thus it doesn't contribute towards a given post's SA score. On the other hand, though: Ok, then why did you not actually use the

RFS: dnscruft (new)

2006-06-19 Thread Adam Borowski
Whee!? In an attempt to infringe on commercial free speech, I'm looking for a sponsor for a new package, "dnscruft". It feeds bind9 a list of domains like: * doubleclick.net * googlesyndication.com and a plethora of other advertisers, spammers, win32 spyware spewers, phishers and other miscreants