Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-29 Thread Marco Bertorello
2008/12/26 Weboide webo...@codealpha.net: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package furl. * Package name: furl Version : 2.1-1 Upstream Author : Kidney Bingos aka Chris Williams ch...@kidney-bingos.demon.co.uk * URL :

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-27 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 02:04:29 +0100 Patrick Matthäi patrick.matth...@web.de wrote: Jonathan Wiltshire schrieb: On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:37:37PM +, Neil Williams wrote: What if not? They stay open till someone else tries to package it and gets rejected? If there is no good reason to

Re: Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-27 Thread Weboide
Thanks everyone for your replies, this helped me understand more about the maintainer job. I will pay more attention to total duplicate programs before maintaining them. I'll stop maintaining furl. Thanks again. -- Weboide (Arnaud Soyez) webo...@codealpha.net [Using: Linux ~ Ubuntu 8.10]

Re: Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-27 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 09:03:36AM -0500, Weboide wrote: Thanks everyone for your replies, this helped me understand more about the maintainer job. I will pay more attention to total duplicate programs before maintaining them. I'll stop maintaining furl. If it's much consolation your

Re: Re: Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-27 Thread Weboide
You could still use your package yourself (dpkg -i .deb) Yeah actually I put some of the packages I do on my PPA (launchpad) so anyone can access it. So I've put this one too. Next time it is wise to retitle your chosen RFP into an ITP I also did that too, I changed it back to RFP before

Re: Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-27 Thread Daniel Aleksandersen
Russ Allbery writes Jonathan Wiltshire writes: What does furl do that other packages can't? We already have curl, lynx, wget and even telnet can be used to dump headers. Can you justify having this package in the archive? Also, HEAD from the libwww-perl package, which is designed for exactly

Re: Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Daniel Aleksandersen wrote: I requested furl because I think it is much easier to use than the alternates. I know other programs does simular tasks, but furl formates the outbut better. Also, it does not require any deeper knowledge to get it working. furl

RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Weboide
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package furl. * Package name: furl Version : 2.1-1 Upstream Author : Kidney Bingos aka Chris Williams ch...@kidney-bingos.demon.co.uk * URL : http://www.gumbynet.org.uk/software/furl.html * License : GPL

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 11:29:29AM -0500, Weboide wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package furl. IANADD and can't upload for you, sorry. But some comments for your review: In your packaging you have a compat level of 7 but don't use debhelper 7 to its potential; you should take as

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk writes: More fundamentally: What does furl do that other packages can't? We already have curl, lynx, wget and even telnet can be used to dump headers. Can you justify having this package in the archive? Also, HEAD from the libwww-perl package,

Re: Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Weboide
Thanks for replying this quick. I chose to package this because this was a RFP and it was a small and useful tool for getting HTTP headers, and doesn't use many libraries. I agree that some other programs do the same thing and surely more than that. What do you suggest? Should I stop working on

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:00:04 -0500 Weboide webo...@codealpha.net wrote: Thanks for replying this quick. I chose to package this because this was a RFP and it was a small and useful tool for getting HTTP headers, and doesn't use many libraries. I agree that some other programs do the same

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:37:37PM +, Neil Williams wrote: What if not? They stay open till someone else tries to package it and gets rejected? If there is no good reason to turn an RFP into an ITP and thence into an upload, there is no reason to leave the RFP open. I think perhaps

Re: RFS: furl

2008-12-26 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Jonathan Wiltshire schrieb: On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:37:37PM +, Neil Williams wrote: What if not? They stay open till someone else tries to package it and gets rejected? If there is no good reason to turn an RFP into an ITP and thence into an upload, there is no reason to leave the RFP