Re: RFS: parti 0.0.6-1 (new package)

2010-02-17 Thread Michael Schutte
Hi Gregor, On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:34:54PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: - d/control: Standards-Version - 3.8.4 (and update your version of lintian :)) Well, crap. That’s what I get for running testing/unstable. - d/copyright: according to DEP5 the Maintainer at the top is the

Re: RFS: parti 0.0.6-1 (new package)

2010-02-17 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:07:14 +0100, Michael Schutte wrote: - d/control: Standards-Version - 3.8.4 (and update your version of lintian :)) Well, crap. That’s what I get for running testing/unstable. :) - You might want to fix the following lintian info with a patch: I: xpra:

Re: RFS: parti 0.0.6-1 (new package)

2010-02-17 Thread Jakub Wilk
* gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org, 2010-02-17, 20:49: Re-uploaded to the same location: http://alioth.debian.org/~michi-guest/packages/parti_0.0.6-1.dsc lintian 2.3.3 “-I --pedantic” clean this time around. Looks good; but since I'm not familiar with the python aspects of packaging I

RFS: parti 0.0.6-1 (new package)

2010-02-16 Thread Michael Schutte
Hi -mentors, I’m looking for comments on (and an upload of :-)) my parti package. dget http://alioth.debian.org/~michi-guest/packages/parti_0.0.6-1.dsc This is the information from the ITP, bug #569203: | * Package name: parti | Version : 0.0.6 | Upstream Author :

Re: RFS: parti 0.0.6-1 (new package)

2010-02-16 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:56:35 +0100, Michael Schutte wrote: I’m looking for comments on (and an upload of :-)) my parti package. dget http://alioth.debian.org/~michi-guest/packages/parti_0.0.6-1.dsc Sounds funny :) I've no experience with python package, so just a few nit-picking