On Friday 01 September 2006 15:31, Sam Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:23:20 +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> > On 31/08/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> also sprach Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1639 +0200]:
> >> > Please no, as tools will start to use X-Homep
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 12:31:56PM +, Sam Morris wrote:
>
> A more practical reason not to do it is that the homepage may move,
> leaving us publishing outdated information for the rest of the stable
> release.
>
An easy and practical solution to that would be to use redirects from
within th
On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:23:20 +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 31/08/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> also sprach Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1639 +0200]:
>> > Please no, as tools will start to use X-Homepage, you will have to
>> > keep compatibility for long time.
On 31/08/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1639 +0200]:
> Please no, as tools will start to use X-Homepage, you will have to
> keep compatibility for long time. And if tools won't use it, it
> makes no use to include it in debi
also sprach Conall O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.01.0739 +0200]:
> > Good evening to Dublin!
>
> Why thank you, however I'm currently in Maui, Hawaii. :P~
Then get off your computer, silly! Especially since you're
apparently enjoying yourself so much to the point of drooling from
the tip o
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:22:26PM IST, martin f krafft
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> incoherently babbled:
> Good evening to Dublin!
Why thank you, however I'm currently in Maui, Hawaii. :P~
Good morning on Limerick however... :)
> Maybe consider updating the dh-make package?
Ah ha! My debian/ script
Good evening to Dublin!
also sprach Conall O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.2214 +0200]:
> > debian/control: any reason why Homepage: is indented?
>
> I see this has already sparked a thread. I merely followed an example I
> was previously pointed to.
It's okay as it is; my bad.
> >
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:34:55AM IST, martin f krafft
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> incoherently babbled:
Hey Martin,
> debian/control: any reason why Homepage: is indented?
I see this has already sparked a thread. I merely followed an example I
was previously pointed to.
> debian/copyright: you d
also sprach Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1639 +0200]:
> Please no, as tools will start to use X-Homepage, you will have to
> keep compatibility for long time. And if tools won't use it, it
> makes no use to include it in debian/control. I always wondered
> why there is no proper sup
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:33:56 +0200
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1616 +0200]:
> > The good solution for this would be to prepare the patch for dpkg
> > that adds Homepage as a field and be done with it... But it seems
>
also sprach Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1616 +0200]:
> This has been discussed before.
Fortunately this is -mentors, so I won't be flamed to death. :)
> I personally like the second format much better (and that's why I
> don't add the extra space).
I wholeheartedly agree.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:33:38 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1403 +0200]:
>> We recommend that you add the URL for the package's home page to the
>> package description in debian/control. This information should be added
>> at the en
On 8/31/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We recommend that you add the URL for the package's home page to the
> package description in debian/control. This information should be added
> at the end of description, using the following format:
> .
> Homepage: h
also sprach Tobias Klauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1403 +0200]:
> We recommend that you add the URL for the package's home page to the
> package description in debian/control. This information should be added
> at the end of description, using the following format:
> .
>
On Thursday 31 August 2006 14:48, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1114 +0200]:
> > I grabbed some of your packages[1], but failed to see any text you
> > claim any copyright over your packaging. I'm just curious if there
> > is any standard text w
On 2006-08-31 at 10:34:55 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Conall O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1003 +0200]:
> > queuegraph - a RRDtool frontend for Postfix queue-statistics
> >
> > The package is lintian clean.
>
> Some more comments:
also sprach George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1114 +0200]:
> I grabbed some of your packages[1], but failed to see any text you
> claim any copyright over your packaging. I'm just curious if there
> is any standard text wrt to that like:
>
> It was downloaded from ... Upstream Author
Op do, 31-08-2006 te 12:14 +0300, schreef George Danchev:
> I grabbed some of your packages[1], but failed to see any text you claim any
> copyright over your packaging. I'm just curious if there is any standard text
> wrt to that like:
>
> It was downloaded from
> ...
> Upstream Author
> ...
>
On Thursday 31 August 2006 11:34, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hi Conall,
>
> also sprach Conall O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1003
+0200]:
> > queuegraph - a RRDtool frontend for Postfix queue-statistics
> > The package is lintian clean.
>
> Some more comments:
> debian/copyright: you don
Hi Conall,
also sprach Conall O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1003 +0200]:
> queuegraph - a RRDtool frontend for Postfix queue-statistics
>
> The package is lintian clean.
Some more comments:
debian/control: any reason why Homepage: is indented?
debian/copyright:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "queuegraph".
21 matches
Mail list logo
