Yet more changes have been made...
New upstream release (well CVS anyway..). Line fitting now works.
still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with othe
Yet more changes have been made...
New upstream release (well CVS anyway..). Line fitting now works.
still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with othe
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> You wrote:
> > Presumably it does postscript or svg output... (R does the former, and
> > you can trivially convert to the later.)
>
> How? gs doesn't seem to have a svg output driver.
pstoedit's libplot driver writes svg and generally works... [althou
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> You wrote:
> > Presumably it does postscript or svg output... (R does the former, and
> > you can trivially convert to the later.)
>
> How? gs doesn't seem to have a svg output driver.
pstoedit's libplot driver writes svg and generally works... [althou
Hi Don!
You wrote:
> Presumably it does postscript or svg output... (R does the former, and
> you can trivially convert to the later.)
How? gs doesn't seem to have a svg output driver.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Don!
You wrote:
> Presumably it does postscript or svg output... (R does the former, and
> you can trivially convert to the later.)
How? gs doesn't seem to have a svg output driver.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, elijah wright wrote:
> methinks there's probably an svg output package for R on CRAN
Like http://www.darkridge.com/~jake/RSvg/ ? ;-)
Don Armstrong
--
The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing
that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing
> > I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
> > sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn with
> > a steep learning curve..
>
> No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do.
> [But when you need its features, it's often the
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, James Stone wrote:
> I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
> sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn
> with a steep learning curve..
No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people
do. [But when you need
>
> There are two separate things that you deal with in R.
>
> The first is raw data. A simple spreadsheet program like gnumeric or a
> texteditor sufices to enter the data.
>
> Once you've got the raw data, you (ideally) perform all of the
> manipulations of that data in R to prepare your graph
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004, elijah wright wrote:
> methinks there's probably an svg output package for R on CRAN
Like http://www.darkridge.com/~jake/RSvg/ ? ;-)
Don Armstrong
--
The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing
that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing
> > I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
> > sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn with
> > a steep learning curve..
>
> No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people do.
> [But when you need its features, it's often the
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004, James Stone wrote:
> I have had a look at R. For my purposes (a drop in replacement for
> sigmaplot or excel), R is overkill, not to say difficult to learn
> with a steep learning curve..
No doubt. R is a bit overkill for almost everything normal people
do. [But when you need
>
> There are two separate things that you deal with in R.
>
> The first is raw data. A simple spreadsheet program like gnumeric or a
> texteditor sufices to enter the data.
>
> Once you've got the raw data, you (ideally) perform all of the
> manipulations of that data in R to prepare your graph
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
> ...but lacks a simple spreadsheet for data editing/easy viewing of
> raw figures. The same is probably true for R. The spreadsheet
> functionality is the reason why I had a look at rlplot; but what I
> am looking for is a replacement for proprietary softwa
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
> ...but lacks a simple spreadsheet for data editing/easy viewing of
> raw figures. The same is probably true for R. The spreadsheet
> functionality is the reason why I had a look at rlplot; but what I
> am looking for is a replacement for proprietary softwa
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>>
>>> I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
>>> not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
>>> going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
>>
>> I'm sorry
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>>
>>> I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
>>> not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
>>> going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
>>
>> I'm sorry
James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
>> not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
>> going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an ear
>
> I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
> not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
> going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
development, but AFAIK it is the onl
James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
>> not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
>> going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an ear
>
> I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
> not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
> going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
development, but AFAIK it is the onl
James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
> now!
>
> still looking for a sponsor..
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going
James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
> now!
>
> still looking for a sponsor..
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going
More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!
still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplo
More changes have been made... Fingers crossed the package is okay
now!
still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplo
>>Changes have now been made... still looking for a sponsor..
>>
>>I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
>>quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
>>available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
>>for bar
>>Changes have now been made... still looking for a sponsor..
>>
>>I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
>>quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
>>available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
>>for bar
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 06:45:43AM +0100, James Stone wrote:
>Changes have now been made... still looking for a sponsor..
>
>I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
>quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
>available with other plotti
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 06:45:43AM +0100, James Stone wrote:
>Changes have now been made... still looking for a sponsor..
>
>I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
>quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
>available with other plotti
Changes have now been made... still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with
Changes have now been made... still looking for a sponsor..
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:10:15 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
>> quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
>> available with other plotting packages lik
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:10:15 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
>> quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
>> available with other plotting packages lik
James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
> quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
> available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
> for bar charts with error bars.
James Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
> quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
> available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
> for bar charts with error bars.
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with error bars.
I have uploaded the packages to
http://www.jms
I am looking for a sponsor for rlplot, a GUI based program to generate
quality scientific graphs. It adds several features which are not readily
available with other plotting packages like gnuplot such as good support
for bar charts with error bars.
I have uploaded the packages to
http://www.jms
38 matches
Mail list logo