RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-3 of my package squidguard. It builds these binary packages: squidguard - filter and redirector plugin for Squid squidguard-doc - filter and redirector plugin for Squid - Documentation The package appears to be lintian clean.

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:43:11PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-3 of my package squidguard. * Oh another DEP5 format definition, and now one that isn't available. I guess that should evolve into some d.n host instead d.o

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 13:41: * Oh another DEP5 format definition, and now one that isn't available. I guess that should evolve into some d.n host instead d.o and without the wsvn in it. Or something else. My confusion grows from package to package. :) Sorry,

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 05:02:16PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: [...] Also done. Shame on me but I missed two other things, I would've commited them to the collab-maint repo but that seems to still miss the the changes in the package. * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Hello Sven, thanks for your time. Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52: * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should be used. There is a reason: package libdb4.7 isn't

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 08:06:55PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Hi, Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 18:52: * I see no reason for urgency=high here. There are no security fixes and we're not in the middle of the release process. So urgency=low should be used.

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Joachim Wiedorn
Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de wrote on 2011-05-29 20:22: Yeah some breakage happens from time to time. I still don't think that's a good reason to shorten the staging periode in unstable, or is this inflicted by this new don't break testing cause it's rolling mantra? As long as it's not

Re: RFS: squidguard (updated package, RC bug fix)

2011-05-29 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 09:01:11PM +0200, Joachim Wiedorn wrote: Uploaded. Now the only problem is the not existing write access to the git repo of collab-maint ... Hmpf. Is this really a permission denied to write to the repo or did you use ssh with password-auth in the past? I've seen some