On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:02:20AM -0500, Matthew Danish wrote:
> Are these SML/NJ specific? It might be a good idea to prefix them if
> they are. Even if they are not, perhaps an sml- prefix would be in
> order, much like CL packages are prefixed with cl-. A crude
> namespacing, but it could he
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:02:20AM -0500, Matthew Danish wrote:
> Are these SML/NJ specific? It might be a good idea to prefix them if
> they are. Even if they are not, perhaps an sml- prefix would be in
> order, much like CL packages are prefixed with cl-. A crude
> namespacing, but it could he
> smlnj-lib : misc libs for sml
At least, I don't want binary packages to be named -lib.
If they are shared libraries, make it
libwhateverX
and read libpkg-guide.
if they are some SML libraries, name them
libsml-whatever-whatever
regards,
junichi
> smlnj-lib : misc libs for sml
At least, I don't want binary packages to be named -lib.
If they are shared libraries, make it
libwhateverX
and read libpkg-guide.
if they are some SML libraries, name them
libsml-whatever-whatever
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:08:19AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> You might want to have a look at how this is done in ocaml (another
> ML implementation). In ocaml, the runtime system has been split off
> in order to accomodate application packages that are compiled into
> ocaml bytecode. Concerning
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote:
> I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
> sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
> facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
> requiring the user to inst
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 10:08:19AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> You might want to have a look at how this is done in ocaml (another
> ML implementation). In ocaml, the runtime system has been split off
> in order to accomodate application packages that are compiled into
> ocaml bytecode. Concerning
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote:
> I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
> sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
> facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
> requiring the user to inst
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote:
> I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
> sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
> facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
> requiring the user to inst
I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
requiring the user to install the compiler.
My main question is how to name these packages appropria
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote:
> I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
> sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
> facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
> requiring the user to inst
I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
requiring the user to install the compiler.
My main question is how to name these packages appropria
12 matches
Mail list logo
