Re: Upload priorities for NEW packages (was: Bug#827933: RFS: yabar/0.4.0-3 [ITP])

2016-08-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi >I agree.  Something known to be >buggy shouldn't be uploaded >anywhere >other than maybe experimental.  When >I talked about low priority in my >previous e-mail, I meant to refer to >disruptive and major changes as you >describe.  Thanks! I would say *everything* is buggy by definition. The

Upload priorities for NEW packages (was: Bug#827933: RFS: yabar/0.4.0-3 [ITP])

2016-08-02 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 12:19:55AM +0200, Jack Henschel wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. Unfortunately, neither Section 4.4 [1] nor > 5.6.17 [2] explain when which urgency should be used (so I just used > the lowest one). Is there documentation for this elsewhere? > [1]