For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0
1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any
package? If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in the
build-depends?
Regards,
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_Robert D. Hilliard<[EM
For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0
1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any
package? If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in the
build-depends?
Regards,
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_Robert D. Hilliard<[EM
Hi Bob!
You wrote:
> For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0
> 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any
> package?
The default one for the architecture in question.
> If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 08:03, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Bob!
>
> You wrote:
> > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0
> > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any
> > package?
>
> The default one
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Bob!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0
> > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any
> > package?
>
> The
> But the plan is to move all architectures to gcc-3.2 for sarge.
> I don't know why this hasn't happened already.
That at least requires working gcc-3.2 and hence probably working
glibc 2.3 for all arches, which has not happened yet.
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
#include
* Junichi Uekawa [Thu, Nov 07 2002, 05:26:09AM]:
> > But the plan is to move all architectures to gcc-3.2 for sarge.
> > I don't know why this hasn't happened already.
>
> That at least requires working gcc-3.2 and hence probably working
> glibc 2.3 for all arches, which has not happened
Hi Bob!
You wrote:
> For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0
> 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any
> package?
The default one for the architecture in question.
> If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 08:03, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Bob!
>
> You wrote:
> > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0
> > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any
> > package?
>
> The default one
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Bob!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0
> > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any
> > package?
>
> The
> But the plan is to move all architectures to gcc-3.2 for sarge.
> I don't know why this hasn't happened already.
That at least requires working gcc-3.2 and hence probably working
glibc 2.3 for all arches, which has not happened yet.
regards,
junichi
#include
* Junichi Uekawa [Thu, Nov 07 2002, 05:26:09AM]:
> > But the plan is to move all architectures to gcc-3.2 for sarge.
> > I don't know why this hasn't happened already.
>
> That at least requires working gcc-3.2 and hence probably working
> glibc 2.3 for all arches, which has not happened
12 matches
Mail list logo