Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Bob Hilliard
For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any package? If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in the build-depends? Regards, Bob -- _ |_) _ |_Robert D. Hilliard<[EM

Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Bob Hilliard
For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any package? If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in the build-depends? Regards, Bob -- _ |_) _ |_Robert D. Hilliard<[EM

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Bob! You wrote: > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > package? The default one for the architecture in question. > If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 08:03, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Bob! > > You wrote: > > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > > package? > > The default one

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Bob! > > You wrote: > > > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > > package? > > The

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> But the plan is to move all architectures to gcc-3.2 for sarge. > I don't know why this hasn't happened already. That at least requires working gcc-3.2 and hence probably working glibc 2.3 for all arches, which has not happened yet. regards, junichi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-09 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Junichi Uekawa [Thu, Nov 07 2002, 05:26:09AM]: > > But the plan is to move all architectures to gcc-3.2 for sarge. > > I don't know why this hasn't happened already. > > That at least requires working gcc-3.2 and hence probably working > glibc 2.3 for all arches, which has not happened

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Bob! You wrote: > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > package? The default one for the architecture in question. > If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 08:03, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Bob! > > You wrote: > > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > > package? > > The default one

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Bob! > > You wrote: > > > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > > package? > > The

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-06 Thread Junichi Uekawa
> But the plan is to move all architectures to gcc-3.2 for sarge. > I don't know why this hasn't happened already. That at least requires working gcc-3.2 and hence probably working glibc 2.3 for all arches, which has not happened yet. regards, junichi

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-09 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include * Junichi Uekawa [Thu, Nov 07 2002, 05:26:09AM]: > > But the plan is to move all architectures to gcc-3.2 for sarge. > > I don't know why this hasn't happened already. > > That at least requires working gcc-3.2 and hence probably working > glibc 2.3 for all arches, which has not happened