Your message dated Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:20:29 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: auter/0.11-1 (ITP: Bug#880600)
has caused the Debian Bug report #883611,
regarding RFS: auter/0.11-1 (ITP: Bug#880600)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:00:56 +0100
with message-id <1514296856.13325.0.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: libmseed/2.19.2 [ITP: Bug#851806]
has caused the Debian Bug report #857864,
regarding RFS: libmseed/2.19.2 [ITP: Bug#851806]
to be marked as done.
This means th
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Paolo Gigante wrote:
> auter - Automatic updates for Redhat and Debian based Linux servers
Please compare and contrast auter with the other packages in Debian
for this task: unattended-upgrades cron-apt packagekit
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Paolo Gigante kirjoitti 05.12.2017 klo 19:54:
Dear mentors,
...
Any assistance with sponsorship and packaging guidance would be greatly
appreciated. In addition, we are very eager and willing to have any
suggestions, requests and/or bugs raised against the auter github page.
Hi Paolo,
I can
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "auter"
* Package name: auter
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : Paolo Gigante
* URL : https://github.com/rackerlabs/auter
* License : Apache-2
Sect
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Mentors,
I hopefully already found a sponsor 'Andreas Tille' for this package,
I should have already done this RFS.
It builds those binary packages:
libmseed2, libmseed-dev and libmseed-doc.
It's intended to read/write Seed (basicaly a seismog
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hello Adam Wight,
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 04:11:28PM +, Adam Wight wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "photo-booth"
[...]
A few notes:
- the Standards-Version you're specif
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "photo-booth"
* Package name: photo-booth
Version : 1.0.1~rc1-1
Upstream Author : Adam Roses Wight
* URL : https://github.com/adamwight/photo-booth
* License
Hello Ben,
thanks for your update. There are only a few things left before we can
upload the package. My main concern is the adventure-common binary
package because I don't believe that shipping advent.dat with an extra
package is very useful at the moment. As a compromise I offer you help
in reso
Howdy Markus,
(Limiting distribution just to the RFS bug report to discuss the
sponsorship.)
Markus Koschany writes:
> Am 18.04.2016 um 02:15 schrieb Ben Finney:
> > Those are in end-line comments (“# foo”). My understanding is that
> > end-line comments with that syntax are permitted in any De
* Víctor Cuadrado Juan , 2016-02-08, 19:22:
dtmp = /build
This doesn't sound like a right place to store this socket. /build
normally doesn't exist; and in build environments where it does exist,
it's not writable by normal users.
Please put the sockets somewhere within the package build di
I need help with the python-neovim package, which is
almost done (you can see it on alioth[1]).
Right now I am stalled, as I can't get the tests to pass
when building in a chroot (pbuilder).
The tests require a neovim instance running as server, so for
example one can use `dtach` to run nvim, and
Your message dated Thu, 15 Oct 2015 07:18:44 + (UTC)
with message-id <29709094.954002.1444893524373.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#801782: RFS: node-private/0.1.6+20141112-1 [ITP, bug
#789794]
has caused the Debian Bug report #801782,
regarding RFS: node-private
Hi,
Le 14/10/2015 17:28, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, as said on irc:
control:
1) priority: optional
Ok.
changelog
2) 0.1.6+20141112-1 --> 0.1.6+git20141112-1
Not according to a discussion with jonas on irc.
3) README.source.
Inst
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, as said on irc:
control:
1) priority: optional
changelog
2) 0.1.6+20141112-1 --> 0.1.6+git20141112-1
3) README.source.
Instead of wget -c https://github.com/benjamn/private/archive/.tar.gz
maybe something like
https://github.com/benjamn/pr
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-private"
* Package name: node-private
Version : 0.1.6+20141112-1
Upstream Author : Ben Newman
* URL : https://github.com/benjamn/private
* License
Your message dated Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:18:05 + (UTC)
with message-id <1277885608.463854.1444832285082.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#801444: RFS: node-bootstrap-tour/0.10.2+dfsg-1 [ITP
bug #801443]
has caused the Debian Bug report #801444,
regarding RFS
Your message dated Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:36:44 + (UTC)
with message-id <1872397774.2573400.177004679.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#801438: RFS: node-moment/2.10.6+dfsg-1 [ITP bug
#759958 ]
has caused the Debian Bug report #801438,
regarding RFS: node-moment/
Le samedi 10 oct. 2015 à 09:37:46 (+), Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> Control: owner -1 !
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> grep MIT . -R
> returns some files, please update the copyright accordingly
> (if needed of course, but I leave checks to you :) )
>
> the files were originally MIT lic
Control: owner -1 !
Hi,
as said on irc I would appreciate a look at this lintian pedantic warning:
P: node-moment source: source-contains-prebuilt-javascript-object locale/bo.js
line length is 447 characters (>256)
let me know how and if you want to look at it :)
the package looks fine anyw
Hi,
Le samedi 10 oct. 2015 à 09:37:46 (+), Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> Control: owner -1 !
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi
>
> grep MIT . -R
> returns some files, please update the copyright accordingly
> (if needed of course, but I leave checks to you :) )
>
> the files were origi
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
grep MIT . -R
returns some files, please update the copyright accordingly
(if needed of course, but I leave checks to you :) )
the files were originally MIT licensed it seems, so please check if
this still applies.
cheers,
G.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-bootstrap-tour"
* Package name: node-bootstrap-tour
Version : 0.10.2+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Ulrich Sossou
* URL : https://github.com/sorich87/bootstrap-to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-moment"
* Package name: node-moment
Version : 2.10.6+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Tim Wood, Iskren Chernev and Moment.js contributors
* URL : https://github
Your message dated Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:27:04 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library
has caused the Debian Bug report #788217,
regarding RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sun, 21 Jun 2015 04:26:59 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: clblas/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#786505] -- OpenCL BLAS
library
has caused the Debian Bug report #788214,
regarding RFS: clblas/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#786505] -- OpenCL BLAS library
to be marked as done.
This means
On Thu, 18 Jun, 2015 at 1:15 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
wrote:
Hello, upload
but I have a few remarks.
here the rules file
# see EXAMPLES in dpkg-buildflags(1) and read /usr/share/dpkg/*
DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk
why is it necessary to export the
Hello, upload
but I have a few remarks.
here the rules file
> # see EXAMPLES in dpkg-buildflags(1) and read /usr/share/dpkg/*
> DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
> include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk
why is it necessary to export the symbols since you are using compat level 9 ?
> %:
>dh $@ --s
2015-06-18 10:08 GMT+01:00 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <
frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr>:
> > I have updated both clBLAS and clFFT with a patch that suppresses the
> offending flags.
>
> > You can build the most recent version of the package from the d-science
> repositories with:
>
> >
> I have updated both clBLAS and clFFT with a patch that suppresses the
> offending flags.
> You can build the most recent version of the package from the d-science
> repositories with:
> gbp buildpackage --git-upstream-tag=v2.4 --git-upstream-branch=master \
>--git-debian-branch=debian/s
Hi Fred,
2015-06-17 20:24 GMT+01:00 Ghislain Vaillant :
>
>>
>> > One option would be to just patch the build system and comment out the
>> part where the offending build flag is set. I
>> > doubt however that upstream would be happy with this solution, since
>> they must have setup their CI infr
2015-06-17 13:44 GMT+01:00 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <
frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr>:
> > I checked it out and both clBLAS and clFFT actually suffer from the same
> problem. It seems upstream is rolling its own
> > "multiarch" detection / selection mechanism. The detection is based
> I checked it out and both clBLAS and clFFT actually suffer from the same
> problem. It seems upstream is rolling its own
> "multiarch" detection / selection mechanism. The detection is based on the
> result of CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P, and the
> selection can be overriden via a cmake option.
obviou
2015-06-17 10:41 GMT+01:00 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <
frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr>:
>
>
> 2015-06-17 10:25 GMT+01:00 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <
> frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr>>:
> Hello Ghislain,
>
> It seems to me thah
2015-06-17 10:25 GMT+01:00 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
mailto:frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr>>:
Hello Ghislain,
It seems to me thaht I already saw this problem with Jerome... I built my
package on a 32bit system.
> cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i586-linux-gnu/library && /usr/bin/c++
> -
2015-06-17 10:25 GMT+01:00 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <
frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr>:
> Hello Ghislain,
>
> It seems to me thaht I already saw this problem with Jerome... I built my
> package on a 32bit system.
>
> > cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i586-linux-gnu/library && /usr/bin/c++
> -D
Hello Ghislain,
It seems to me thaht I already saw this problem with Jerome... I built my
package on a 32bit system.
> cd /«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i586-linux-gnu/library && /usr/bin/c++
> -DCLFFT_EXPORTS -DclFFT_EXPORTS -m64 -pthread -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong
> -Wformat -Werror=format-securi
Hi Fred,
Since both clFFT and clBLAS share a similar setup, I am surprised that one
succeeds and the other
fails to build on your machine. Some more comments below:
2015-06-17 8:27 GMT+01:00 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <
frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr>:
> Hello Ghislain, I am trying t
> Hi Fred,
> Thanks for checking my package out.
Sorry for the noise I realize thaht I ran lintian on my wheezy machine
This is why I have theses messages.
> I'll send a patch upstream, but I don't think it is worth adding a patch to
> the packaging for
> such a harmless issue.
quality ;)
Hi Fred,
Thanks for checking my package out.
My comments are below:
2015-06-17 8:46 GMT+01:00 PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <
frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr>:
> Hello,
>
> I go thtese lintian errors
>
> lintian
> ───
>
> E: clblas source: missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.
Hello,
I go thtese lintian errors
lintian
───
E: clblas source: missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~)
N:
N:The package doesn't specify a build dependency on a package that is used
N:in debian/rules.
N:
N:lintian intentionally does not take into account transitive
N:
Hello Ghislain, I am trying to build your package with sbuild and I got htis
error message.
make[3]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i586-linux-gnu'
/usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report
/«PKGBUILDDIR»/obj-i586-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles 4
[ 8%] Building CXX object library/CMakeFiles/clFFT.d
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "photo-booth":
Package name: photo-booth
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream author : Adam Roses Wight
License : GPL-3
Section : graphics
Description: Self-serve photo boot
reopen 788217
owner 783084 Ghislain Vaillant
stop
I had overlooked "With his authorization". Reopening and setting Ghislain as
the owner of the ITP.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jun 2015 09:12:48 +
with message-id <20150613091248.gi2...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library
has caused the Debian Bug report #788217,
regarding RFS: clfft/2.4-1 [ITP Bug#783084] -- OpenCL FFT library
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clfft"
* Package name: clfft
Version : 2.4-1
Upstream Author : Kent Knox
* URL : https://github.com/clMathLibrar
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas"
* Package name: clblas
Version : 2.4-1
Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
* URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS
* License
See also the ongoing discussion in the LedgerSMB ITP bug[1], #
406935.
RJ Clay
j...@rocasa.us
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=406935
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 662968 wishlist
Bug #662968 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: shc/3.8.7-1
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> retitle 662968 RFS: shc/3.8.7-1 [ITP] -- Generic shell script compiler
Bug #662968 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: shc/3.8.7-1
Cha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 660270 RFS: gnonograms [ITP] -- create and solve nonogram puzzles
Bug #660270 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: gnonograms -- create and solve nonogram
puzzles
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: gnonograms [ITP] -- create and solve nonogram
puzzles' f
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "leechcraft".
Previous message was few days ago but new stable release happened and updated
package was uploaded to m.d.n..
You can look at package rules here:
https://github.com/tehnick/leechcraft-debian/tree/master/debian/
Furthe
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "leechcraft".
This is repeated message. It have passed:
- 3 months from the first message (03 Oct 2011)
- 2 months from the last repeated message (05 Nov 2011)
You can look at package rules here:
https://github.com/tehnick/leech
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub".
This is repeated message. It have passed:
- 67 days from the first message (27 Sep 2011)
- 14 days from the last message (18 Nov 2011)
And there are no replies for the last one.
uHub is a server software for Advanced Direc
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub".
This is repeated message. It have passed:
- 53 days from the first message (27 Sep 2011)
- 13 days from the last message (05 Nov 2011)
Last discussion messages:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/11/msg00120.htm
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:23:06 +0200
Boris Pek wrote:
> > This seems to be a bit excessive. There is no real use in having
> > many tiny packages for every function; please keep in mind that
> > this will make the Packages index even larger (which also affects
> > users that do not even have the p
Hi,
>>> qxmpp, Qxt, eiskaltdcpp, miniupnpc, parseUri, lightbox,
>>> hunspell/myspell (and anything else in 3rdparty or third-party dirs)
>>> are either already in Debian or should be packaged separately, you
>>> should not include them in the binary package or tarball.
>> You are really mista
Hi,
>>> I probably won't sponsor the package, but I was wondering if it is
>>> really necessary to build 53 binary packages (if I did not miscount)?
>> The short answer: yes, it is.
>>
>> Here I can cite the description from my first message:
>>> LeechCraft is a free open source cross-platfor
[...]
> You can use wildcards in .install files like these:
[...]
> usr/share/leechcraft/translations/leechcraft_poshuku_*.qm
[...]
I have just found again the reason to not use it. Available wildcards are very
primitive. And they will affect to sub-plugins. For example:
usr/share/leechcraft/trans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Boris,
On 08.11.2011 15:58, Boris Pek wrote:
>> qxmpp, Qxt, eiskaltdcpp, miniupnpc, parseUri, lightbox,
>> hunspell/myspell (and anything else in 3rdparty or third-party dirs)
>> are either already in Debian or should be packaged separately, you
Hi,
Boris Pek writes:
>> I probably won't sponsor the package, but I was wondering if it is
>> really necessary to build 53 binary packages (if I did not miscount)?
>
> The short answer: yes, it is.
>
> Here I can cite the description from my first message:
>> LeechCraft is a free open source cro
Hi,
> I probably won't sponsor the package, but I was wondering if it is
> really necessary to build 53 binary packages (if I did not miscount)?
The short answer: yes, it is.
Here I can cite the description from my first message:
> LeechCraft is a free open source cross-platform modular internet
> While I think this package is interesting, I do not intend to sponsor it.
Thanks a lot for such detailed review!
And for possibility to practice in English. =)
> That said, here is a review of the source package:
>
> I'm not sure it is appropriate to change the ABI names used by
> upstream to a
Hi,
Boris Pek writes:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "leechcraft".
I probably won't sponsor the package, but I was wondering if it is
really necessary to build 53 binary packages (if I did not miscount)?
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.de
While I think this package is interesting, I do not intend to sponsor it.
That said, here is a review of the source package:
I'm not sure it is appropriate to change the ABI names used by
upstream to a Debian-specific one. If you want to change the library
names that should be done upstream.
Ple
There is no similar packages in Debian yet.
06.11.2011, 02:17, "Paul Wise" :
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Boris Pek wrote:
>
>> uHub is a server software for Advanced Direct Connect protocol wich uses by
>> client's software like linuxdcpp or eiskaltdcpp (these packages are present
>> in D
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Boris Pek wrote:
> uHub is a server software for Advanced Direct Connect protocol wich uses by
> client's software like linuxdcpp or eiskaltdcpp (these packages are present
> in Debian repo for a long time).
I'm not interested in this protocol or this package, but
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "leechcraft".
This is repeated message. It have passed:
- 33 days from the first message (03 Oct 2011)
- 26 days from the last repeated message (10 Oct 2011)
Last discussion messages:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/10/msg
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub".
This is repeated message. It have passed:
- 40 days from the first message (27 Sep 2011)
- 15 days from the last message (21 Oct 2011)
Last discussion messages:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/10/msg00128.html
ht
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub".
This is repeated message. Previous one was 15 days ago. And it took 11 days
from the last messages in that thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/10/msg00128.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/10/msg001
Hi,
>> Direct link:
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/leechcraft/leechcraft_0.4.90-1.dsc
>
> A couple of notes and random nitpickings:
>
> * The package description of leechcraft-incubator suggests it is a meta
> package, yet, it only depends on ${misc:Depends}, and has no .ins
Hi,
>> I have tried to follow by your recommendations.
>> I have added file uhub.lintian-overrides:
>> https://github.com/tehnick/uhub-debian/blob/master/debian/uhub.lintian-overrides
>> But I still get the same lintian warning.
>> What am I doing wrong?
>
> Hrm. This looks ok to me at a glance. I
(IANADDY applies)
Boris Pek writes:
> Direct link:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/leechcraft/leechcraft_0.4.90-1.dsc
A couple of notes and random nitpickings:
* The package description of leechcraft-incubator suggests it is a meta
package, yet, it only depends on ${misc:
Boris Pek writes:
[debian/copyright; orig.tar.bz2]
> I really don't understand that do you want. Present information is enough
> to make own tarball.
The current version in git is perfect. Thanks!
>>> So .orig.tar.bz2 formed in such way:
>>> https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/D
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "leechcraft".
There are such changes from previous attempt:
* File debian/copyright was rewritten in according to DEP-5.
* Additional fields Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser in debian/control were updated.
* Additional section get-orig-source w
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub".
uHub is a server software for Advanced Direct Connect protocol wich uses by
client's software like linuxdcpp or eiskaltdcpp (these packages are present
in Debian repo for a long time).
This package contains small count of source fil
> (Please don't CC me, when replying to list mail)
Ok, I have just read interesting document:
http://catb.org/%7Eesr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I have never used mailing lists befor.
It's a little bit archaic method of interaction...
>>> It would also be nice if you'd describe how exactly the .or
* Gergely Nagy , 2011-10-06, 23:47:
This is bad idea:
W: uhub: non-standard-dir-perm var/log/uhub/ 0750 != 0755
N:
N:The directory has a mode different from 0755, and it's not one of the
N:known exceptions.
N:
N:Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 10.9 (Permissions and owners) for
N
(Please don't CC me, when replying to list mail)
Boris Pek writes:
>>* debian/copyright appears to be a mix between free-form and DEP-5. I
>> would recommend using either, but not a mix between the two, as that
>> looks just awkward.
>
> I have not aimed to support DEP5. Such form of writing j
> Didn't have time for a through review yet, but a couple of things I'd
> like to comment on:
Thanks a lot for your remarks. I fixed some of them.
>* debian/copyright appears to be a mix between free-form and DEP-5. I
> would recommend using either, but not a mix between the two, as that
> loo
Boris Pek writes:
> This package contains small count of source files. So it don't required a lot
> of time for review.
Didn't have time for a through review yet, but a couple of things I'd
like to comment on:
* debian/copyright appears to be a mix between free-form and DEP-5. I
would recomm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Boris,
On 03.10.2011 20:38, Boris Pek wrote:
>>> It builds those binary packages:
>>> leechcraft - Core executable of LeechCraft
>>> leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
>>> []
>
>> None of the short descriptions ma
>> It builds those binary packages:
>> leechcraft - Core executable of LeechCraft
>> leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
>> []
> None of the short descriptions make any sense to me without knowing what
> leechcraft is.
Thank you for interest. Of cause I can describe
* Boris Pek [111003 02:00]:
> It builds those binary packages:
> leechcraft - Core executable of LeechCraft
> leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
[]
None of the short descriptions make any sense to me without knowing
what leechcraft is.
Bernhard R. Link
--
Hi Enas,
This is more suitable for debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, Mail-Followup-To
set. BTW: I'm not subscribed to debian-mentors; feel free to Cc me.
Op Sun 24 Apr 2011 om 10:06:55 +0200 schreef Joost van Baal:
> Op Fri 22 Apr 2011 om 08:44:57 +0200 schreef Enas Gianni:
> > Sorry maybe I have
On Sunday 15 March 2009 12:52:51 Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Od: Paul Wise
>> You need a Debian sid install to build and test your packages in
>> before uploading them to Debian, so you could use that to report the
>> bug.
>I am using pbuilder with option "--distribution sid"
>It should be fine I hope.
> Od: Paul Wise
> You need a Debian sid install to build and test your packages in
> before uploading them to Debian, so you could use that to report the
> bug.
I am using pbuilder with option "--distribution sid"
It should be fine I hope.
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-req
Hi mira
In that case you need to specify that you are reporting in the Debian BTS:
reportbug --bts debian wnpp
Cheers,
Andreas
--
,-¤. Kubuntu Linux
¤; http://www.kubuntu.org
`-¤' Linux for Human Beings
On Sunday 15 March 2009 18:12:02 Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > Od: Ryan Niebur
> >
> > O
> 2009/3/16 Jaromír Mikeš :
> I am running ubuntu based distro "reportbug wnpp" not working on it can I use
> "ubuntu-bug"?
> Or some other way?
reportbug --bts=debian
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors
2009/3/16 Jaromír Mikeš :
> I am running ubuntu based distro "reportbug wnpp" not working on it can I use
> "ubuntu-bug"?
> Or some other way?
You need a Debian sid install to build and test your packages in
before uploading them to Debian, so you could use that to report the
bug.
Also, the BTS
> Od: Ryan Niebur
>
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 05:48:29PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > I know that I should report a bug if I want make a new package.
> > I was studying "Developers Reference, section 5.1" but anyway it is not
> > clear
> for me how to do it.
> >
> > Can somebody help me pls?
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 05:48:29PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that I should report a bug if I want make a new package.
> I was studying "Developers Reference, section 5.1" but anyway it is not clear
> for me how to do it.
>
> Can somebody help me pls?
>
run "reportbug
Hello,
I know that I should report a bug if I want make a new package.
I was studying "Developers Reference, section 5.1" but anyway it is not clear
for me how to do it.
Can somebody help me pls?
regards
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
libgpiv. As I don't
> > find it yet on the debian repository, I have been looking if the ITP bug
> > has been closed. This seems not to be the case, yet.
> Do you know http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html, where I see that it
> is waiting?
>
> > The ITP bug reports ver
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:19:29PM +0200, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
> About one week ago my mentor uploaded my package libgpiv. As I don't
> find it yet on the debian repository, I have been looking if the ITP bug
> has been closed. This seems not to be the case, yet.
Do you k
Hi!
On 4/27/06, Gerber van der Graaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About one week ago my mentor uploaded my package libgpiv. As I don't
> find it yet on the debian repository, I have been looking if the ITP bug
> has been closed. This seems not to be the case, yet.
The bug
About one week ago my mentor uploaded my package libgpiv. As I don't
find it yet on the debian repository, I have been looking if the ITP bug
has been closed. This seems not to be the case, yet.
The ITP bug reports version 0.3.2, but the upstream version (that has
been packaged by me) has
* Package name: tams
Version : 2.79
Upstream Author : Matthew Weinstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://tamsys.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : program for qualitative analysis of marked-up text
TAMS is simply a way of marking up documents
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 03:23:11PM +0200, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Back in 2003 I filed an RFP and then made it an ITP for kmut:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=186180
>
> It never ended up in the Debian archive and I don't need it anymore. Is
> it ok to close the bu
Hello,
Back in 2003 I filed an RFP and then made it an ITP for kmut:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=186180
It never ended up in the Debian archive and I don't need it anymore. Is
it ok to close the bug to help (just a little) cleanup the wnpp bug
list?
Thanks,
Adriaan
--
To
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 03:39:46PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> The subject line does not get sent, so your message won't get though.
Using dadadodo? :) The subject line is the only thing that gets sent to the
submitter, apart from the automatic notification junk.
--
Digital Electronic Being I
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
