Re: libgdbm transition

2016-07-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Dmitry >FAIL camldbm_1.0-2.dsc | PATCH >FAIL courier_0.73.1-1.6.dsc >FAIL freeradius_2.2.8+dfsg-0.1.dsc | PATCH >FAIL ifmail_2.14tx8.10-22.dsc | PATCH >FAIL nis_3.17-34.dsc | FTPFS pre-history debhelper >FAIL ntop_5.0.1+dfsg1-2.1.dsc | FTBFS issues with rrd >FAIL o

Re: libgdbm transition

2016-07-13 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Tobias Frost , 2016-07-13, 21:17: You will have to file all the bugs manually, but I expect all the bugs will follow a similar template. You'll find mass-bug(1) from devscripts helpful on the filing part. Unlikely. mass-bug(1) produces almost series of almost-identical mails that can vary o

Re: libgdbm transition

2016-07-13 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2016-07-13 01:35 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > Some time ago I made gdbm_1.12-3 into experimental, and since it is > incompatible with > gdbm-1.8 (new soname, separated compat library) I rebuilt all reverse > depedencies. > Here is my report: > > FAIL camldbm_1.0-2.dsc | PATCH >

Re: libgdbm transition

2016-07-13 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Mittwoch, den 13.07.2016, 11:33 +0100 schrieb James Cowgill: > You will have to file all the bugs manually, but I expect all the > bugs will follow a similar template. You'll find mass-bug(1) from devscripts helpful on the filing part. > > James --  tobi

Re: libgdbm transition

2016-07-13 Thread James Cowgill
On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 07:35 +0100, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > > We do not have automation > > to rebuild packages and file FTBFS bugs, do we? > > Automated whole-archive rebuilds have been done (see e.g.  > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768691 ), but I > don't know whether they

Re: libgdbm transition

2016-07-12 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
It looks as MBF, but I would like someone more experienced to give advice. The transitions policy is here: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions We do not have automation to rebuild packages and file FTBFS bugs, do we? Automated whole-archive rebuilds have been done (see e.g.

libgdbm transition

2016-07-12 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Hello! Some time ago I made gdbm_1.12-3 into experimental, and since it is incompatible with gdbm-1.8 (new soname, separated compat library) I rebuilt all reverse depedencies. Here is my report: FAIL camldbm_1.0-2.dsc | PATCH FAIL courier_0.73.1-1.6.dsc FAIL freeradius_