On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 08:00:23PM -0700, Kayven Riese wrote:
> I have a friend who has incentivized me to implement a very specific
> addition of an option to the cut command that he says is part of HP Linux
> and has been standard in the past having to do with condensing white
> space. He wants
For the mailing list: Kayven is unlikely to ever see my mail since gmail
rejected the directly delivered message as usual.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 02:30:10PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 08:00:23PM -0700, Kayven Riese wrote:
> > I have a friend who has incentivized me to
If I didn't properly subscribe to this list, I apologize.
I have a friend who has incentivized me to implement a very specific
addition of an option to the cut command that he says is part of HP Linux
and has been standard in the past having to do with condensing white
space. He wants me to
Hej Andreas,
Sure, sounds great! Thanks very much for offering to help. Sorry I have been
so slow -- I have lots of administrative and pedagogical responsibility, and no
students that might compile c++.
I thought I saw OpenMM is already packaged. If not it should have an MIT
license so
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:02:32AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> On 2019-02-26 18:27, Samuel Flores wrote:
> > I would like some help packaging MacroMoleculeBuilder (MMB) for
> > distribution in Debian or Ubuntu. It is a mature piece of code, used to
> > publish many
Hi Samuel,
On 2019-02-26 18:27, Samuel Flores wrote:
> I would like some help packaging MacroMoleculeBuilder (MMB) for distribution
> in Debian or Ubuntu. It is a mature piece of code, used to publish many
> scientific articles in structural bioinformatics and structural and molecular
>
Please ask your questions.
See also https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Dear Debian Mentors,
I would like some help packaging MacroMoleculeBuilder (MMB) for distribution in
Debian or Ubuntu. It is a mature piece of code, used to publish many scientific
articles in structural bioinformatics and structural and molecular biology. It
has been downloaded thousands of
Helly Guys,
Sorry for the late reply, at the moment I don't have good internet
connection, give me one week and I'll work on it.
Kind regards,
--
Julián Moreno Patiño
Debian Developer
.''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD}
: :' : Free Operating Systems
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- GPG
Sorry, I initially missed that warning. It is fixed now, I've
re-uploaded the debs.
There are still two spelling warnings, but those are false positives -
those strings are not present in the sources. Is there anything I can do
to remove those?
Cheers,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
Ok, I'll choose option 1) :)
Thanks,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 08/28/2015 10:56 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Julián, do you want to upload?
Răzvan for the binaries false positive you can:
1) not care at all (they are pedantic)
2) add a lintian
Hi Julián, do you want to upload?
Răzvan for the binaries false positive you can:
1) not care at all (they are pedantic)
2) add a lintian override
for me both are good :)
cheers,
G.
Hi Gianfranco, and thank you for coming here to make a contribution :)
I'v not uploaded a new version with the modifications yet, but I have a few
questions below.
please fix all the above (message #72 of bug 772823)
I did all that was doable in a reasonable time. As said before, for what need
Hi, all!
After several ping-pongs with Julian, we've finally managed to have a
candidate for upstream. I've uploaded the latests sources here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/opensips/opensips_2.1.1-1.dsc
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
Hi, I think you might want to fix the last two copyright issues
I unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright
paragraph at line 1366
paragraph at line 53
I wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright
cfg.tab.c (paragraph at line 53)
cfg.tab.h (paragraph at line 53)
(not blockers I guess, but nice to
Hello guys,
Sorry but yestarday I was in the Debconf dinner. Right now I am at
#debian-opensips in irc.debian.org
Kind regards,
--
Julián Moreno Patiño
Debian Developer
.''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD}
: :' : Free Operating Systems
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- GPG Fingerprint:
C2C8 904E
Hi, Gianfranco, Julian!
I revised the copyright files, ported some of Julian's work and
generated a new set of debs. You can find them online.
Let me know what to do next.
PS: Note that we have just release OpenSIPS 2.1.1
Thanks a lot for your help!
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
Hi, Gianfranco!
It is not removed - it is still in the sources, but not in the
.orig.tar.gz archive, since I read the upstream tarball should not have
packaging specs inside it.
Should I remove the copyright exception?
Thanks,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On
Hi,
It is not removed - it is still in the sources, but not in the
.orig.tar.gz archive, since I read the upstream tarball should not have
packaging specs inside it.
Should I remove the copyright exception?
For Debian sources means the orig tarball, that should be the same as
the upstream
Hi,
I unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright
paragraph at line 70
I wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright
packaging/gentoo/opensips-*.ebuild (paragraph at line 70)
I guess you removed it?
Julian, how do you feel about it?
cheers,
G.
Il Giovedì 20 Agosto 2015 13:45, Răzvan Crainea
Hello guys,
Right now I am in irc.debian.org at debian-opensis channel, if you
want we can coordinate there.
Kind regards,
2015-08-20 7:53 GMT-05:00 Gianfranco Costamagna costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it:
Hi,
It is not removed - it is still in the sources, but not in the
.orig.tar.gz archive,
Hello,
The package fail to build from source:
dpkg-buildpackage: source package opensips
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.1.1-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution unstable
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Razvan Crainea raz...@opensips.org
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64
Hi, Gianfranco!
I fixed all the other warnings, but still have 3 that I don't really
know how to handle:
W debian-watch-file-in-native-package
* You asked me to add a watch file, but I created a native package.
Should I remove the file?
W native-package-with-dash-version
* I can't change
Hi
W debian-watch-file-in-native-package* You asked me to add a watch file, but
I created a native
package. Should I remove the file?
why? don't you have an orig tarball to start from?
http://opensips.org/pub/opensips/latest/src/
just use quilt source format, and make the vcs point to
Hello guys,
I worked in opensis packaging sometime ago, may be this would be useful:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/pkg-voip/opensips/trunk/debian/
or just check out the repository:
svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-voip/opensips/trunk/
Check carefully the copyright, when I checked the source code I
Dear mentors,
We are looking for a sponsor for a couple of packages submited by Frederic
Bonnard
kimchi (bug # 772823 http://bugs.debian.org/772823)
sphde (bug #787491 http://bugs.debian.org/787491)
Hi, Gianfranco!
I uploaded the latest version and it seems there are no other warnings.
I changed the format of the archive to be non-native updated some of the
files and everything seems ok now.
@Julian: thanks for checking this too. I am aware there were some issues
regarding the
Hi,
I didn't have time for a complete review, but two things needs to be fixed:
some copyrights are missing, ISL and some BSD2 IIRC
(I did a licensecheck * -r)
changelog should have one single entry with initial upload closes blah or
whatever, and the target suite should be unstable, not
Kimiki review:
please fix all the above (message #72 of bug 772823)
d/changelog: no need to put your name into []
when you are the only one who worked on the package (and the signature
is your)
d/rules: as said skipping tests is usually bad, please enable them if possible
d/copyright:
sphde:
d/changelog: please set to unstable the target series
d/control: what about having the doxygen documentation in a -doc package
arch=all with doxygen moved to build-depends-indep?
look e.g.
https://sources.debian.net/src/websocketpp/0.6.0-1/debian/control/
and the rules file
(note, you
BTW I would like to have a rules file with plain dh_ calls, can you please
try to use the rules file from julian's svn?
you can compare the output of two builds with debdiff if needed, I would really
appreciate the move
(actually it should simplify the packaging, and makes two lintian warnings
Hi,
Can you please check now. Not sure what happened in the first place.
It looks like it still has some lintian warnings that I didn't detect (I
was using an older lintian version), but I will work on fixing those too.
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
Yes, would be nice to fix them too :)
let me know when you have done!
thanks,
G.
Il Martedì 18 Agosto 2015 16:35, Răzvan Crainea raz...@opensips.org ha
scritto:
Hi,
Can you please check now. Not sure what happened in the first place.
It looks like it still has some lintian warnings that
Hi, Gianfranco!
I managed to fix most of the warnings I had. Please check out the latest
sources on mentor's site[1].
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/opensips
Many thanks,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 08/14/2015 10:41 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi,
unfortunately the upload seems to be missing
Uploaded: 2015-08-14 13:41
cheers,
G.
Il Martedì 18 Agosto 2015 15:22, Răzvan Crainea raz...@opensips.org ha
scritto:
Hi, Gianfranco!
I managed to fix most of the warnings I had. Please check out the latest
sources on mentor's
Hi Răzvan,
thanks for the fixes,
mentors is showing many lintian errors...
can you please fix them?
reporting them here:
E copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl
W hardening-no-relro
I hardening-no-fortify-functions
(usually fixed by not overriding C*FLAGS and LDFLAGS
I
Hi, Gianfranco!
Thanks for looking into this and pointing me to the right documentation.
I did some package cleanup as you requested:
1) Looking through the bugs agaist wnpp[1], I found out there was a
previous Request For Package for OpenSIPS here[2] and I changed its
title to ITP and its
Hi
My name is Razvan Crainea[1] and I am one of the Core developers of the
OpenSIPS project, a Voice-over-IP SIP server. We would like our project
to be added to the official Debian repository and we need a mentor to
help us achieve this.
We already have some DEB packages for OpenSIPS that
On 05/08/15 17:10, Danny Edel wrote:
I won't have it ready today, expect a revised package tomorrow.
While going through the changes, I actually stumbled upon a regression,
forcing me to release a bugfix/maintenance version v1.13.1 upstream.
I used the opportunity to do some cleaning:
* Create
Hello Gianfranco,
On 06/08/15 16:16, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/dspdfviewer...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c2/c35e6f96f063aff4e0d6e3e644855c31b11a0f.debug...done.
Ah yes, it says something like that for me now too, once I install
Hi Danny,
[upstream changes]
nice!
is the dbg package working? how can I verify?
(too lazy to quote you :) )
$ dpkg -i ../dspdfviewer_1.13.1-1_amd64.deb
[snip]
$ gdb /usr/bin/dspdfviewer
[snip]
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/dspdfviewer...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
$ dpkg
Hi Danny
(sending privately)
please do *not* use cdbs :)
It will scare you away!
I do not like it, dh is really better, and fortunately people are switching to
dh :)
cheers,
G.
Il Giovedì 6 Agosto 2015 16:57, Danny Edel deb...@danny-edel.de ha scritto:
Hello Gianfranco,
On 06/08/15
Well now it's public that I do not like cdbs :)
TBH I do not understand it, and the popcon is 1/5 of debhelper.
Two reasons to keep me away from it :)
cheers,
G.
Il Giovedì 6 Agosto 2015 17:18, Gianfranco Costamagna
costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it ha scritto:
Hi Danny
(sending privately)
Hi Gianfranco,
thank you for the input! I had actually not found this introductory page
yet, now I actually have a debian mentors account. Maybe this time the
upload will work : )
Regarding your points:
Please look e.g. at this one
https://sources.debian.net/src/s3cmd/1.5.2-4/debian/watch/
On 05/08/15 11:52, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Some issues:
1) please provide a .desktop file if possible
I will.
2) it seems to work bad with an external monitor.
It splits the pdf half in the main monitor and half in the extended one.
I'm attaching a picture.
This is working
This is working exactly as intended : )
Try the -f / --full-page command-line switch for regular PDFs.
ok, I thought this was a bug... BTW I have the main monitor to the left, and
the extended to the right, why does it show the opposite order for regular pdfs?
The main feature is the
On 05/08/15 12:44, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
This is working exactly as intended : )
Try the -f / --full-page command-line switch for regular PDFs.
ok, I thought this was a bug... BTW I have the main monitor to the
left, and the extended to the right, why does it show the opposite
If you pass no command-line switch it assumes its a double-width pdf,
which has the presenter side on the right and audience on the left.
It should™ render the presenter view (with the clocks and the notes) to
the primary screen (you can set with xrandr --output XXX --primary),
regardless of
On 05/08/15 13:53, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
maybe that s should be put in the manpage somewhere?
Well, it is, under the controls section. But I guess that's not really
well-placed, since you didn't find it straight away : )
If you have a suggestion on where to place and/or how to re-word
Well, it is, under the controls section. But I guess that's not really
well-placed, since you didn't find it straight away : )
nope, the manpage is correct, I tried a --help, and I didn't find it
(sorry for the confusion)
If you have a suggestion on where to place and/or how to re-word the
On 05/08/15 16:15, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
nope, the manpage is correct, I tried a --help, and I didn't find it
(sorry for the confusion)
If you have a suggestion on where to place and/or how to re-word the
manpage, that would be much appreciated. Since I'm more a developer than
a
Other two nitpicks, no need to cc me, I'm subscribed to the list, and
it is called Debian, not debian :)
cheers!
G.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hello Riley,
thank you for listing those things!
I will comment on each of your points inline, I hope that's okay.
On 04/08/15 00:02, Riley Baird wrote:
Hi Danny,
I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but I had a look and
here are some things that I noticed:
d/changelog:
Damn enter key :)
Hi again
http://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html
gpg --recv-keys 7183343C
gpg: requesting key 7183343C from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpg: key 7183343C: Danny Edel m...@danny-edel.de not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: unchanged: 1
everything
Hi Danny,
(just answering where possible)
Could you take a look at the debian/watch file? Those opts and regexes
twisted my mind a bit, not sure if I have done that right.
Please look e.g. at this one
https://sources.debian.net/src/s3cmd/1.5.2-4/debian/watch/
it should be good for you too.
On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 15:57:08 +0200
Danny Edel deb...@danny-edel.de wrote:
Dear Debian mentors,
I have created a debian package for my project dspdfviewer, a
dual-screen pdf viewer specifically made for LaTeX-Beamer presentations.
I have been programming and maintaining this since winter
Dear Debian mentors,
I have created a debian package for my project dspdfviewer, a
dual-screen pdf viewer specifically made for LaTeX-Beamer presentations.
I have been programming and maintaining this since winter 2012/2013, and
I believe it is stable and mature enough now to be included in
Hi Fabien,
On Saturday 30 August 2008 02:15, Fabien Cellier wrote:
This is a routing protocol based on RFC3561 for Ad-Hoc networks. This
implementation seems to be the best available.
(Why) do you think it is the best protocol for ad-hoc networks? Or do you mean
this program is the best
Hi Fabien,
On Saturday 30 August 2008 02:15, Fabien Cellier wrote:
This is a routing protocol based on RFC3561 for Ad-Hoc networks. This
implementation seems to be the best available.
(Why) do you think it is the best protocol for ad-hoc networks? Or do you mean
this program is the best
On Saturday 30 August 2008 02:15, Fabien Cellier wrote:
This is a routing protocol based on RFC3561 for Ad-Hoc networks. This
implementation seems to be the best available.
(Why) do you think it is the best protocol for ad-hoc networks? Or do you
mean this program is the best
Stefan Ott a écrit :
On Saturday 30 August 2008 02:15, Fabien Cellier wrote:
This is a routing protocol based on RFC3561 for Ad-Hoc networks. This
implementation seems to be the best available.
(Why) do you think it is the best protocol for ad-hoc networks? Or do you
mean this program is the
Hi Fabien,
On Saturday 30 August 2008 16:22, Fabien Cellier wrote:
I mean that it *could* be the best implementation of rfc3561.
Ok :)
I cannot answer this. I personally used it successfully with 3
computers. For largest scale test, please refer to upstream author.
Ok. (I probably wont do
thus looking for a mentor/sponsor to publish this package into
Debian. Holger? :)
Please CC me on your answer.
Cheers,
Fabien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello again,
I just managed to upload my aodv-uu package on mentors.debian.net.
I also picked up the magic template :
From: Fabien Cellier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: RFS: aodv-uu
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package aodv-uu.
* Package
On 9/15/05, Sven Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joost van Baal wrote on 14/09/2005 10:56:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:11:03PM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
I would like someone to have a look at it:
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/~hanke/mentors
debian-mentors readers: I am looking at
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 02:55:55PM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
That's it! Thanks. One question left: Is there any situation you can
think of where an external interface would have no hardware address?
If there is no such situation one could grep for 'HWaddr' instead.
Lots of them. Ppp
Joost van Baal wrote on 14/09/2005 10:56:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:11:03PM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
I would like someone to have a look at it:
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/~hanke/mentors
debian-mentors readers: I am looking at it know. The package is marked
as such on
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 05:11:03PM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
I would like someone to have a look at it:
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/~hanke/mentors
debian-mentors readers: I am looking at it know. The package is marked
as such on http://sponsors.debian.net/ .
There is one open issue.
Hi!
I found it difficult to setup a NAT firewall with iptables - till I
found Arno's Iptables firewall - which is an extremly easy to
understand configuration shell script.
Unfortunately it is not part of Debian, yet.
So I decided to give it a try and packaged it.
I would like someone to have
in Mandrake
9.1/9.2 ).
At he moment, I am looking for a mentor who can assist me with packaging and
my plans to apply for official debian maintainer status ( so i can
redistribute packages and gave a little something back to the community ).
If anyone is interested and willing to help, please let me
in Mandrake
9.1/9.2 ).
At he moment, I am looking for a mentor who can assist me with packaging and
my plans to apply for official debian maintainer status ( so i can
redistribute packages and gave a little something back to the community ).
If anyone is interested and willing to help, please let me
in Mandrake
9.1/9.2 ).
At he moment, I am looking for a mentor who can assist me with packaging and
my plans to apply for official debian maintainer status ( so i can
redistribute packages and gave a little something back to the community ).
If anyone is interested and willing to help, please let me
in Mandrake
9.1/9.2 ).
At he moment, I am looking for a mentor who can assist me with packaging and
my plans to apply for official debian maintainer status ( so i can
redistribute packages and gave a little something back to the community ).
If anyone is interested and willing to help, please let me
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:08:53AM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 07:06:12PM -0800, Jess Mahan wrote:
I would like to become a Debian maintainer, but I understand that I
need a mentor first.
Right now you need to have a sponsor to look over your packages then
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:08:53AM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 07:06:12PM -0800, Jess Mahan wrote:
I would like to become a Debian maintainer, but I understand that I
need a mentor first.
Right now you need to have a sponsor to look over your packages then
Hi,
I would like to become a Debian maintainer, but I understand that I
need a mentor first.
Right now, there are only two packages that I would like to maintain:
- wmnetload
- msmtp
I have packaged these, and they are available via:
deb http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
deb-src
Hi,
I would like to become a Debian maintainer, but I understand that I
need a mentor first.
Right now, there are only two packages that I would like to maintain:
- wmnetload
- msmtp
I have packaged these, and they are available via:
deb http://digitalssg.net/debian ./
deb-src
structures and eigenstates of periodic dielectric structures.
h5utils can also be used with any program using the HDF5 format,
allowing easy conversions to PNG format. The packages are on the web at :
http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~jmouette/debian (it is also apt-able).
So I am looking for a mentor
structures and eigenstates of periodic dielectric structures.
h5utils can also be used with any program using the HDF5 format,
allowing easy conversions to PNG format. The packages are on the web at :
http://www.ens-lyon.fr/~jmouette/debian (it is also apt-able).
So I am looking for a mentor
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:25:05PM -0500, Lex Spoon wrote:
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:25:05PM -0500, Lex Spoon wrote:
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who
On Wednesday 10 Oct 2001 7:24 am, Lex Spoon wrote:
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would
love to contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to
maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me
out? For anyone who wants
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
On Wednesday 10 Oct 2001 7:24 am, Lex Spoon wrote:
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would
love to contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to
maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me
out? For anyone who wants
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
Hello, I've put together a couple of Debian packages, and would love to
contribute them to the Debian Project. I'm willing to maintain them.
However, I don't have an advocate or sponsor. Can anyone help me out?
For anyone who wants to peek, the packages are at:
Hi folks
in order to become a Debian developer, I'm looking for a mentor
to debianize the YARD Radius package. I'm the upstream author
of the package, which you can find at
http://yardradius.sourceforge.net
Yet Another Radius Daemon (YARD) is a free RADIUS RFC-compliant daemon
for accounting
Hi folks
in order to become a Debian developer, I'm looking for a mentor
to debianize the YARD Radius package. I'm the upstream author
of the package, which you can find at
http://yardradius.sourceforge.net
Yet Another Radius Daemon (YARD) is a free RADIUS RFC-compliant daemon
for accounting
"Christian T. Steigies" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you already apply for maintainership? I think you will be
assigned a sponsor then.
No, I did not apply for maintainership. This is required when one
wants to produce packages that are to be included in the Debian
distributions, right? I
Christian T. Steigies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you already apply for maintainership? I think you will be
assigned a sponsor then.
No, I did not apply for maintainership. This is required when one
wants to produce packages that are to be included in the Debian
distributions, right? I
91 matches
Mail list logo
