Bug#843664: RFS: node-recast/0.11.16-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Control: blocks -1 843660 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-recast" * Package name: node-recast Version : 0.11.16-1 Upstream Author : Benjamin Newman * URL :

Bug#843666: RFS/ITP: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-fs-extra" * Package name: node-fs-extra Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : JP Richardson * URL : https://github.com/jprichardson/node-fs-extra *

Bug#843355: marked as done (RFS: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:46:10 + with message-id <20161108164610.zk5eovshftp2c...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843666: RFS/ITP: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843666, regarding RFS: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This

Bug#843661: RFS: node-graceful-fs/4.1.10-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-graceful-fs" * Package name: node-graceful-fs Version : 4.1.10-1 Upstream Author : Isaac Z. Schlueter, Ben Noordhuis and contributors * URL :

Bug#843661: marked as done (RFS: node-graceful-fs/4.1.10-1)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:59:20 + with message-id <20161108155920.y3iijingn6loo...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843661: RFS: node-graceful-fs/4.1.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843661, regarding RFS: node-graceful-fs/4.1.10-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#843666: marked as done (RFS/ITP: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:46:10 + with message-id <20161108164610.zk5eovshftp2c...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843666: RFS/ITP: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843666, regarding RFS/ITP: node-fs-extra/1.0.0-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#843660: marked as done (RFS: node-ast-types/0.9.1-1)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:56:01 + with message-id <20161108155600.uvmzbpudqhblp...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843660: RFS: node-ast-types/0.9.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843660, regarding RFS: node-ast-types/0.9.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#843660: RFS: node-ast-types/0.9.1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-ast-types" * Package name: node-ast-types Version : 0.9.1-1 Upstream Author : Ben Newman * URL : http://github.com/benjamn/ast-types * License

Bug#843657: marked as done (RFS: node-typescript/2.0.8-1)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:05:43 + with message-id <20161108160543.6fi2hvn4yvoay...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843657: RFS: node-typescript/2.0.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843657, regarding RFS: node-typescript/2.0.8-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#843657: RFS: node-typescript/2.0.8-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-typescript" * Package name: node-typescript Version : 2.0.8-1 Upstream Author : Microsoft Corp. * URL : http://typescriptlang.org/ * License :

Bug#843583: RFS: imagemagick/8:6.9.6.2+dfsg-3

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:49:52PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imagemagick" Hi Bastien! Please, avoid using Cc to notify people of bugs, use x-debbugs-cc instead... > dget -x >

Bug#843664: marked as done (RFS: node-recast/0.11.16-1)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 16:09:07 + with message-id <20161108160906.36tn3l6d63dsy...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843664: RFS: node-recast/0.11.16-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843664, regarding RFS: node-recast/0.11.16-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#843659: RFS: node-source-map-support/0.4.6+ds-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-source-map-support" * Package name: node-source-map-support Version : 0.4.6+ds-1 Upstream Author : Ewan Wallace * URL :

Bug#843659: marked as done (RFS: node-source-map-support/0.4.6+ds-1)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:53:12 + with message-id <20161108155311.xtm5fc7t32uwp...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843659: RFS: node-source-map-support/0.4.6+ds-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843659, regarding RFS: node-source-map-support/0.4.6+ds-1 to be marked as

Bug#843669: RFS: eclib/20160720-3

Hi, On 08/11/2016 17:55, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:40:45PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclib" o/ Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/eclib.git

Bug#842429: RFS: mlocate/0.26-1.1 [NMU]

On 11/08/2016 09:11 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:50:51PM -0700, Dan Mick wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mlocate" > > o/ Thanks, Mattia. > (though that template ought to be more clever and don't

Bug#843669: RFS: eclib/20160720-3

Hi, On 08/11/2016 18:30, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 06:22:34PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: * d/copyright looks outdated; at least your own copyright is, but please look over all of it. + maybe stop mixing tabs and spaces so irregularly too? I tried to rework it. well,

Bug#843669: marked as done (RFS: eclib/20160720-3)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 18:34:56 + with message-id <20161108183455.shbk3jqs5gpvf...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#843669: RFS: eclib/20160720-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #843669, regarding RFS: eclib/20160720-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#843669: RFS: eclib/20160720-3

control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 moreinfo On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:40:45PM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclib" o/ > Vcs-Git: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/eclib.git * please kill the dh-autoreconf build-dep *

Bug#843684: RFS: hexer/1.0.3-1 -- new upstream version, refresh the packaging

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hexer": * Package name: hexer Version : 1.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev * URL : https://devel.ringlet.net/editors/hexer/ * License

Bug#843126: Bug#843120: ITP: freight -- easy-to-understand shell script to handle APT repositories

Hi Steve, I think we accidentally replied to the ITP, instead of the RFS. Also, did you have time to check the updated version of the package? Best, nicoo On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 02:54:39PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the catch and for reviewwing the package.

Re: Building package under kfreebsd/hurd

Thanks!. I will try your suggestions. Best regards. Elías On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: > On 11/07/2016 12:46 AM, Elías Alejandro wrote: >> I wonder if there's a way to build packages for distinct >> architectures, specifically for >> Hurd or

[fwd: call for participation - Debian contributors survey, 1st ed.]

This was originally posted to debian-devel-announce yesterday. It has been suggested (thank you Sean!) to forward it to -mentors, in order to reach out to all packager contributors (both mentors and mentees) that are on this list and might not follow other Debian lists. Cheers. - Forwarded

Re: Bug#843604: RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC]

Le 08/11/2016 à 04:40, Bill Blough a écrit : > Package: sponsorship-requests > It builds those binary packages: > > libxerces-c-dev - validating XML parser library for C++ (development files) > libxerces-c-doc - validating XML parser library for C++ (documentation) > libxerces-c-samples -

Bug#843604: marked as done (RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC])

Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:48:16 + (UTC) with message-id <229291342.416583.1478598496...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#843604: RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #843604, regarding RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC] to be marked as done.

Re: Bug#843604: RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC]

Le 08/11/2016 à 10:56, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > > If the transition freeze is effective, uploading this to unstable will > severely hinder work on any package that build-depends on xerces-c. > Or maybe not. No SONAME bump, no problem. Sorry for the noise.

ITP's not showing up on debian-devel?

Hi Everyone, I recently posted two ITP's http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843325 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843570 The confirmation message said that they would be forwarded to debian-devel, but it has been a while and I do not see either of them there.

Re: ITP's not showing up on debian-devel?

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 11:28:55PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I recently posted two ITP's > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843325 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843570 > > The confirmation message said that they would be forwarded to >

Re: Bug#843604: RFS: xerces-c/3.1.4+debian-1 [RC]

Hi Thibaut! >Or maybe not. No SONAME bump, no problem. Sorry for the noise. yes, the new release is mostly about: including CVE patches, updating autoconf files (useless for us). I checked for ABI changes, and I found none. Please let me know if any reverse-dependency breaks, even if I don't

Re: ITP's not showing up on debian-devel?

Andrey Rahmatullin writes: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 11:28:55PM -0800, Walter Landry wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I recently posted two ITP's >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843325 >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843570 >> >> The

Re: Build a sort-of-systemd-dependent package on kfreebsd

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, at 10:39, Alec Leamas wrote: > I'm now trying to wrap my head around how to conditionalize a packet > such as lirc. I'm coming from Fedora/RPM and used to just spread some > %ifarch in the spec file. Now, is something similar possible in debian? It should be possible, yes.

Re: Build a sort-of-systemd-dependent package on kfreebsd

Cc'ing the entire message to debian-mendors. Sorry for the screw-up, I CC'd something that did not have enough context for any useful help. On Tue, 08 Nov 2016, Alec Leamas wrote: > We are about to push the new lirc to stable. As-is, the package declares a > dependency on systemd and thus

Re: Build a sort-of-systemd-dependent package on kfreebsd

On 08/11/16 14:13, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, at 10:39, Alec Leamas wrote: I'm now trying to wrap my head around how to conditionalize a packet such as lirc. I'm coming from Fedora/RPM and used to just spread some %ifarch in the spec file. Now, is something

Re: Build a sort-of-systemd-dependent package on kfreebsd

Hi Alec [answering on debian-mentors] On 08.11.2016 13:39, Alec Leamas wrote: > In particular: > - How can I handle that kfreebsd should install a different set of files? Never done that, but I guess use dh-exec filtering in the debian/*.install files. > - Is it possible to conditionalize

Bug#843636: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi/3.22.14, ITP: 843633 -- disconnect wifi extension for GNOME shell

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi": * Package name: gnome-shell-extension-disconnect-wifi Version : 3.22.14 Upstream Author : Gopi Sankar Karmegam * URL :