Hi Xiangfu Liu,
I don't find version 201206 on the upstream website. Where did you get it ?
http://mentors.debian.net/package/xburst-tools
How is progress on donating/lending a suitable device to a sponsor for getting
bug 613610 fixed ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 688185 RFS: winswitch/0.12.16+svn20120916-1 [ITP]
Bug #688185 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: winswitch/0.12.16+svn20120916-1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: winswitch/0.12.16+svn20120916-1 [ITP]' from 'RFS:
winswitch/0.12.16+svn20120916-1'
stop
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 688184 RFS: redmine-plugin-markdown/2.0.1+git20120821-1 [ITP]
Bug #688184 [sponsorship-requests] RFS:
redmine-plugin-markdown/2.0.1+git20120821-1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: redmine-plugin-markdown/2.0.1+git20120821-1 [ITP]'
from 'RFS:
Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:14:04 +
with message-id e1teaxy-000199...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: pyswisseph/1.77.00.0+dfsg-2 [ITP] -- Python
extension to the Swiss Ephemeris
has caused the Debian Bug report #661664,
regarding RFS: pyswisseph/1.77.00.0+dfsg-2
Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:14:03 +
with message-id e1teaxx-000188...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: openastro.org/1.1.25+dfsg-4 [ITP] -- Fully
featured Open Source Astrology software
has caused the Debian Bug report #661665,
regarding RFS:
Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:14:03 +
with message-id e1teaxx-000188...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: openastro.org/1.1.25+dfsg-4 [ITP] -- Fully
featured Open Source Astrology software
has caused the Debian Bug report #661665,
regarding RFS:
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 07:06 +, Bart Martens wrote:
I don't find version 201206 on the upstream website. Where did you
get it ?
He is upstream, I expect he created it and uploaded it to mentors but
forgot to upload it to the website.
How is progress on donating/lending a suitable device
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/20/2012 03:31 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 07:06 +, Bart Martens wrote:
I don't find version 201206 on the upstream website. Where did you
get it ?
Here it is:
Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2012 07:43:32 +
with message-id e1tebq4-00075f...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: git2cl/2.0+git200808271242-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #688111,
regarding RFS: git2cl/2.0+git200808271242-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi Arno and Boris,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to maintain some packages, which are removed in sid now.
(scim-hangul, scim-sunpinyin, scim-pinyin, scim-array).
How should I do? Should I send a WNPP bug report as a usual new
package,
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
scim-sunpinyin has been removed by its maintainer because
it is buggy and crashes. Please don't reintroduce it, there's
already ibus-sunpinyin that works perfectly.
Thanks for the information. However, I
On 09/20/2012 04:28 PM, Tz-Huan Huang wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Thomas Goirandz...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
scim-sunpinyin has been removed by its maintainer because
it is buggy and crashes. Please don't reintroduce it, there's
already ibus-sunpinyin that works
Hi there,
I am trying to update one of my package to Std-Vers: 3.9.4. In
particular I am looking at §8.6 which now recommends symbols files.
According to recent post on -dev handling of c++ libs should be done
using pkgkde-gensymbols. So I followed instructions from:
On 16 Sep 2012, at 14:18, Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote:
Hi Nicholas,
Thanks for your comments!
So here are some stupid questions for starters:
1,) I'm running LXDE and openbox and I know nothing about X11. How do I
get cwm working? Could I have that in a README.Debian file
Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:20:13 +
with message-id e1teju5-0001v7...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: scscp-imcce/0.7.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- IMCCE SCSCP C
Library
has caused the Debian Bug report #686046,
regarding RFS: scscp-imcce/0.7.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- IMCCE SCSCP C Library
Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org
$ pkgkde-gensymbols -V -plibgdcmMSFF2.2 -v2.2.1 -Osymbols.amd64
-edebian/tmp/usr/lib/libgdcmMSFF.so.2.2.1
The name of the package is wrong, isn't it? I guess the name of the package
should be libgdcm2.2, thus this command works for me for the current version
Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org writes:
I am trying to update one of my package to Std-Vers: 3.9.4. In
particular I am looking at §8.6 which now recommends symbols files.
According to recent post on -dev handling of c++ libs should be done
using pkgkde-gensymbols.
You may want to read:
James,
I am delighted to hear from you.
I followed your advice and it works. I can see the attraction of using
cwm this way. However it might just be a step too far for me as copy and
paste seems not to work.
I have managed to get cwm sort of working. If I edit
How would I build a package without a .dsc file using cowbuilder?
Eric
On 9/19/2012 1:47 AM, Boris Pek wrote:
Hi,
Sounds like a good idea. Which (pbuilder or cowbuilder) would you recommend?
I recommend cowbuilder. It's much faster and it less pull a hard drive.
(Last is important for me as
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:04:04PM -0700, Eric wrote:
How would I build a package without a .dsc file using cowbuilder?
2 ways:
- dpkg-source -b on parent dir
- pdebuild on the sources dir
i found pdebuild+cowbuilder a very nice combination
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C
It works. Thanks!
Now, on a related note, how would I find someone to upload my package to
Debian unstable? The package already exists, but I just took over as
maintainer.
Eric
On 9/20/2012 6:54 PM, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 05:04:04PM -0700, Eric wrote:
How would
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Eric wrote:
Now, on a related note, how would I find someone to upload my package to
Debian unstable? The package already exists, but I just took over as
maintainer.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
--
To
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Eric wrote:
Now, on a related note, how would I find someone to upload my package to
Debian unstable? The package already exists, but I just took over as
maintainer.
Bah, pressed send too early, anyway I wanted to link to these pages:
Dear all,
Which of vector format of pic are FOSS? such as svg?
--mohsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1348191014.4830.71.camel@debian
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
Which of vector format of pic are FOSS? such as svg?
The format of vector images isn't relevant, the license is what makes
a vector image FOSS or not.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
the license of the software that is used to read the format is
relevant, not just the license of the data.
there are people who publish data in dw g format which cannot be read
by free software in some versions (see the libredwg project)
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:11:52AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
Which of vector format of pic are FOSS? such as svg?
The format of vector images isn't relevant, the license is what makes
a vector image FOSS or not.
And often, the
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
Which of vector format of pic are FOSS? such as svg?
The format of vector images isn't relevant, the license is what makes
a vector image FOSS or not.
That's only half-true. A non-free license
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Adobe Illustrator, for example, saves its vector data in a format which
cannot effectively be edited in anything else. That means that, no
matter the copyright license of the resulting document, it would be
disingenuous to call the document
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
python-uniconverter can output Adobe Illustrator format, so that isn't
the best example, but point taken
thanks for the tip, i did not know about that. but there is no promise
that a give file will be covertable, just because it
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
thanks for the tip, i did not know about that. but there is no promise
that a give file will be covertable, just because it can convert
existing files does not mean it will work when you need it.
Indeed, just as there is no guarantee that
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
Indeed, just as there is no guarantee that GCC is be able to compile
your source code
the difference is that if you accept AI files the file might be
viewable with AI when they send it, but there is no one checking if it
is
On 09/20/2012 05:30 PM, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
Dear all,
Which of vector format of pic are FOSS? such as svg?
--mohsen
The SVG format is an open standard and is internally formatted as
human-readable text. It is readable not only by a lot of graphics
software, but now all the
33 matches
Mail list logo
