On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:05:11PM +0100, fre...@free.fr wrote:
What are the recommended permissions for all the files that reside inside the
debian directory ?
Usual 644/755 I suppose, what makes you think about different perms?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dwarf-fortress.
That's good news.
Unfortunately, the package is not ready yet.
dwarf-fortress-bin - Dwarf Fortress binaries
dwarf-fortress-data - Dwarf Fortress data files
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:48:50PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
The other correct way, as far as I could see, to have an i386 package
available on amd64 is to use ia32-libs package, however this package
does not contain all the required dependencies for dwarf-fortress
(sdl-ttf, sdl-image and glew
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:15:00PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
I'm not talking about patches, gbp and gbp-pq. I mean git checkout magic
in your Makefile.
As with any other standalone Debian package, dget --build for .dsc URL or
dpkg-source -x and dpkg-buildpackage for downloaded one. You
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:15:39AM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
I've updated the packages on mentors and splitted the original one in
two. There's the main dwarf-fortress with binaries, data files and
scripts for modding support, and the default graphic mod package that
is also required. I've not
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
I'm currently wondering where to check stuff that has changed from one
standard version
to the next (e.g. 3.9.2 vs. 3.9.3) and what is relevant for own packages. Is
there
something like a changelog?
.
[Andrey Rahmatullin]
* Adopt the package, move it to the pkg-mpd team. Update Maintainer,
Uploaders, Vcs-* accordingly (Closes: #612908).
* Bump debhelper compatibility level to 9.
* Enable all hardening options.
* Explicitly use the soup backend instead of the default curl backend
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 01:13:35PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
First, If you're proposing a different algorithm for password
generation, have you looked into contributing the algorithm to apg? If
not, why?
Please also note that while apg generates secure passwords, rpg doesn't
care about such
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:24:19AM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
As for security, I hope there are no such problems in last uploaded
version.
Please clearly state somewhere that your software doesn't attempt to
generate cryptographically secure passwords.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:19:44PM +0200, Werner Detter wrote:
I am looking for instructions on how to create a debian package that uses
cmake as build
system as I'm wondering how the debian/rules should look and what it should
contain for
cmake? Can anyone tell me a small package that uses
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:27:20AM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
Hello. I've created a number of Debs for single-binary packages in the
past, but now I am getting into packaging libraries. For the most part
it has not been difficult to figure out how to package a library, but I
am not quite
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:26:47PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
Build for hppa and powerpcspe won't build with this meesages:
burp (= 1.3.4-2) build-depends on one of:
- debhelper (= 9.20120513)
I don't see that on https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=burp
so where are the
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
Can some help with this problem?
Build for hppa and powerpcspe won't build with this meesages:
burp (= 1.3.4-2) build-depends on one of:
- debhelper (= 9.20120513)
I don't think these ports are supposed to work.
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:59:02PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
My package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
The warning:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink.html
a) I notice the warning is appearing for the lib package and NOT the
-dev package
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:03:09AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
b) I notice the verbose output (on the mentors summary page)
shows an SONAME in a slightly different format:
usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so
Notice: librutil-1.8.so, while the -dev package creates a
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:03:06AM +0200, Björn Esser wrote:
Why does dh = 9 (in paticular the latest version in sid) put the
debugging-symbols in
usr/lib/debug/.build-id/$(2-Byte-Random)/$(Random).debug when building
a lib with multi-arch-support?
Because it uses NT_GNU_BUILD_ID field to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hello.
I request a fast QA upload of the prelink package with several patches
from the upstream VCS that fix the wine build. I want to have wine built
with this version (more precisely, with the version that produces proper
binaries, if this
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 05:33:31AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
There are two RFS bugs for prelink, bug 659522 from Daniel Martí and bug
676516
from Andrey Rahmatullin. Both RFS'es claim to have a package ready for
sponsoring at mentors.
At first sight the package at mentors seems from
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:42:12AM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
i try to upload my dsc packages and sources but i get key singin errors, i
generated the 4096 key and put in debian mentors profile.. but when i
upload this happened:
GnuPG signature check failed on XX.changes
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:13:16AM +0200, Daniel Martí wrote:
Thanks for the QA upload. I'll repack my ITA as NMU and retitle this bug
now. If I understand the process correctly, I should put the QA team as
its maintainer, but leave myself in the changelog entry for this NMU,
right?
Daniel,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:28:33PM +0200, Daniel Martí wrote:
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccH3oLmR.o: undefined reference to symbol 'bar'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'bar' is defined in DSO ./reloc1lib1.so so try adding
it to the linker command line
./reloc1lib1.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xboxdrv
* Package name: xboxdrv
Version : 0.8.4-1
Upstream Author : Ingo Ruhnke grum...@gmx.de
* URL : http://pingus.seul.org/~grumbel/xboxdrv/
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qmpdclient
* Package name: qmpdclient
Version : 1.2.2-2
Upstream Author : Voker57 voke...@gmail.com
* URL : http://bitcheese.net/wiki/QMPDClient
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package dwarftherapist
* Package name: dwarftherapist
Version : 0.6.12+hg20120621-1
Upstream Author : Justin Ehlert ehler...@gmail.com
* URL :
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:35:34AM +0200, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote:
I want the libary to be a fully compatible runtime and compile-time
replacement for the closed-source one, so I have no choice but to use
the exact same symbol names in my header. What I do is I take the
header of the
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:27:15PM +1000, Ruben Rubio Rey wrote:
I have been reading lots of documentation in the last days, and I believe
that next thing I need to move forward is to find an sponsor.
I have some idea to get started:
- I have packaged a beanstalk python client, which does
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 05:57:46PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Greetings,
could someone sponsor this?
http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/
It's 403 so I cannot be sure it targets sid, but if it does, are you
aware of the freeze and its implications?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:28:56PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Greetings,
could someone sponsor this?
http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/
It's 403
403?
All files yield 403 Forbidden.
so I cannot be sure it targets sid, but if it does, are you
aware of the
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:57:12PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Updating a package in unstable during the freeze makes updating that
package in testing (if needed) more complicated.
Well it's not _STRICTLY_ needed for it to go into testing, the changes are
not
that important.
I mean if
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:21:39PM -0400, Alex Korobkin wrote:
1. Download the source of my package: apt-get source liblcms2-2
Note that we don't have Ubuntu precies as our default repo so the command
doesn't do the same as for you. You mean dget
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 08:51:58AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
The problem is Makefile files that are regenerated by configure called in
the clean target.
That these files are patched by debian/patches/debian-changes-* is another
problem, caused by this one.
Sounds like a situation where I
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:46:08PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
Is there a tool to create a .deb from a directory of files? I am
thinking of a Mathematica install I just had to perform and I'd rather
put a .deb in our local repo and have clients pull it rather than
manually installing this
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:33:52AM -0700, Eric wrote:
I'm a new maintainer taking over the maintenance of an existing
package. I have a question about the computer on which I'm creating
the package. Should I upgrade it to sid or leave it at stable?
If you are able to live on sid, do it, as it
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 01:12:38PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server issue?
There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on the mentors incoming queue, did you
try to upload it twice?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server
issue?
There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on the mentors incoming queue,
did you try to upload it twice?
Yes, I made another change and then tried to upload again
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 02:36:39PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server
issue?
There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on the mentors incoming queue,
did you try to upload it twice?
Yes, I made another change and then tried to upload again
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:47:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Overrides are discouraged for experimental/info level tags. Perhaps
lintian could be modified to ignore this when the exit() occurs inside
yy_fatal_error(), not sure how it detects this though.
By checking the symbol table, obviously,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:23:02PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I have spent some time into writing a watch file for
https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/
but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed some other
failures. Any idea whether a clever mangling might help anyway?
No,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:40:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I have spent some time into writing a watch file for
https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/
but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed some other
failures. Any idea whether a clever mangling might help
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 05:10:58PM +0100, Erik Sjölund wrote:
I got rid of the shlib-calls-exit by letting CMake replace the exit()
call with an abort call().
That sounds very wrong.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:30:22PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
Hi all,
I packaged the Dhrystone benchmark for Debian, as I coulnd't find a
package for it:
https://github.com/qris/dhrystone-deb
And I'd like to find a sponsor to check and maybe upload it for me.
Thanks in advance.
Please
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:17:25PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
The warnings and errors are:
W: dhrystone: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
W: dhrystone: description-synopsis-starts-with-article
E: dhrystone: section-is-dh_make-template
W: dhrystone: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/dhry
I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mcelog
* Package name: mcelog
Version : 1.0~snapshot20121127-1~exp1
Upstream Author : Andi Kleen a...@linux.intel.com
* URL :
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:44:55PM +0100, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote:
Why does git-buildpackage need pristine-tar to generate the orig.tar.gz
file?.
It doesn't and it's even not enabled by default.
Can't it just pick the contents from the upstream branch
together with version number
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 03:30:09PM +0100, Antonio Ospite wrote:
In my limited experience if the upstream project uses git already and
_tags_ stable releases it is very easy to avoid using pristine-tar
It's also very easy to avoid it in any other workflow: just don't enable
it. There is no
Hello. I use git-buildpackage and want to use ccache. I tried exporting
overriden CC and PATH, but that had no effect and `echo' in debian/rules
shows that both variables are reverted to the defaults. Does
git-buildpackage clear the environment? How can I use ccache in this
configuration?
--
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 04:32:44PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
Another question: is there a sort of inheritance ? like:
--
Files: directory/*.c
Copyright: 2004-2010, Somebody
License: GPL-2
See /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 02:29:17PM +0530, Arvind S Raj wrote:
Oh I didn't know that! Made the necessary changes! And one question-is it
possible to view the files in a particular git repository via the browser?
Navigating to http://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/openteacher.git/ didn't
help
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:13:26PM +0530, Arvind S Raj wrote:
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/openteacher.git;a=summary
It's already in your debian/control as Vcs-Browser:
Thanks Andrey! That link is invalid; updated it to the right one! Wouldn't
have even guess it was wrong :).
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:10:24PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote:
In your debian rules file you can use:
dh_installchangelogs -k {your_changelog_filename}
(the -k is to keep the upstream changelog file name and symlink it to
changelog.gz, feel free to drop it if you wish, it will rename the
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:23:01PM +0100, Michele Gastaldo wrote:
In your debian rules file you can use:
dh_installchangelogs -k {your_changelog_filename}
(the -k is to keep the upstream changelog file name and symlink it to
changelog.gz, feel free to drop it if you wish, it will
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:41:00PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
You can also suggest to upstream that they include the debian
directory in a examples directory or similar, so that it doesn't get
in the way of packaging (or just not distribute it in the main package
at all.)
See also
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:01:00PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
- In debian/copyright, the Format header should contain the versioned
DEP5 URL [1]. And you could avoid repeating the BSD-2-clause license
text by using a standalone license paragraph. Also, you should not
duplicate the
Hi all.
I've packaged hg-fast-export (ITP#574914), it is uploaded to
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=hg-fast-export
and http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/hg-fast-export.git;a=summary
I've seeking not only a sponsor, but, more importantly, any
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 06:30:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
Is there no git-svn style way to interact with hg repos through git?
From the docs:
The way the hg API and remote access protocol is designed it is not
possible to use hg-fast-export on remote repositories
(http/ssh). First clone the
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:03:09AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
Well, there is https://github.com/offbytwo/git-hg , it is a 120-lines
shell script which uses (bundled) hg-fast-export and seems to create a hg
repo at .git/hgcheckout, but I didn't try it.
I've tried git-hg from https
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 07:33:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
The git-remote-hg project seems like a much more natural way to
interact with remote hg repositories. I saw some evidence on the git
list and wiki that git-remote-foo is the way forward for foreign VCS
support in git. There was even a
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:29:35PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
Well, there is https://github.com/offbytwo/git-hg , it is a 120-lines
shell script which uses (bundled) hg-fast-export and seems to create a hg
repo at .git/hgcheckout, but I didn't try it.
I've tried git-hg from https
: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/librsync/librsync_0.9.7-8.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Andrey Rahmatullin
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:46:00AM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
Am I missing a tool?
svn users use svn-buildpackage to store only debian/ in VCS, so yes.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 06:18:17PM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote:
If you link against code which links against OpenSSL, IANAL, but I think
you also need to have the exception in your own code.
So you mean add this exception in debian/copyright?
No, you can't change the upstream license. If
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 09:39:57PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
The first one is the config.sub replacement. What about using something
like the following for your configure target:
set -e; if ! [ -f config/config.sub.backup ]; then \
mv config/config.sub config/config.sub.backup; \
ln
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only
to linux and kfreebsd and exclude hurd-i386 architecture?
I changed Architecture Field from any to linux-any.
kfreebsd is not linux so setting linux-any you excluded it.
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:27:56PM +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.7-8
of my package librsync.
The package looks good.
Have you found a sponsor?
Not yet.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:12:41PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
Does pristine-tar work if the upstream branch contains files which have been
removed during repack?
Unfortunately the directory and the tarball must have identical contents.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Does pristine-tar work if the upstream branch contains files which have
been
removed during repack?
Unfortunately the directory and the tarball must have identical contents.
That's not true, but the larger the difference
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 05:53:48PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
But after dput, may be explain the process ? Both, briefly the before
debexpo uploading workflow ? Imo, to have a little tuto on packaging
on this website will be great. :)
Really? I think there are many documents on how to
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:16:23PM +, mezgani ali wrote:
* License : gpl3
No, it's GPL2+ for aes.c and sha256.c and non-free freeware license (not
explicitly allowing modification) for other files.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:13:52AM +, mezgani ali wrote:
My motivation for maintaining this package is: [fill in].
Huh?
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aescrypt
- Source repository: deb-src
with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gkrellm-gkrellmpc/gkrellm-gkrellmpc_0.1~beta10-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Andrey Rahmatullin
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qmpdclient/qmpdclient_1.2.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Andrey Rahmatullin
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Misha Strong wrote:
I've just written my own program, and I'd like it added to your distro.
I've already filed two ITPs: #637761, #639366. That means that you are
going to make a Debian package for this software. If that is true, did you
make the package?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:41:08PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Misha Strong wrote:
I've just written my own program, and I'd like it added to your distro.
I've already filed two ITPs: #637761, #639366.
I meant you've.
--
WBR, wRAR
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:40:27AM +0200, Misha Strong wrote:
You guys say that my app. won't be very useful, why is that? It provides
a good way for people with low-quality connections to access remote
data.
It's hard to say anything specific without seeing the source.
--
WBR, wRAR
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:21:00PM +1000, onlyjob wrote:
Could someone please kindly have a look at the package I've made
(and provide comments)?
You didn't fix Vcs-* per Arno comments in the ITP bug.
What is This has to be exported to make some magic below work. (before
'export
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:13:33PM +1000, onlyjob wrote:
You didn't fix Vcs-* per Arno comments in the ITP bug.
I can't quite do it yet because I have no public repository.
Then remove the tags. They are optional.
Given that our only option is merge, it looks like there will be no
second
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 02:10:39PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
* Check (build-)dependencies
+ Are all dependencies declared? In particular: Does the package make
use of external commands/includes only insofar they are (build-)essential?
+ Can they be satisfied in main?
+ Are they properly
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
we are trying to build the Gummi (LaTeX editor with preview pane) 0.6 beta
with Pdebuilder (Sid) on
Ubuntu Oneiric, but the building fails due to a missing link against
'gzclose' (Zlib) - please see
the build log:
, but
that doesn't mean they do not exist at all.
gummi-0.5.999-svn1032.tar.gz cannot be built on my sid system even without
pbuilder.
Greetings,
Daniel Stender
On 06.11.2011 22:35, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
we are trying to build
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:15:35AM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote:
You can simply ignore it; there's no need to repack the tarball just
to remove the debian dir. dpkg-buildpackage (or your favourite
wrapper) will remove the debian dir inside the original tarball and
use yours at build time.
This
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:06:00PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
Info: the problem vanished when I've builded with other builders than
pbuilder.
pbuilder was created to be able to build in a controlled environment. No
wonder that some
errors are not present in uncontrolled environments,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:49:32PM +, mezgani ali wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-ipcalc.
* Package name: python-ipcalc
Version : 0.3-2
Upstream Author : Wijnand Modderman wijn...@freecode.nl
* URL :
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:31:36PM +, mezgani ali wrote:
updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it
Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info.
Patch headers should be in DEP-3 form, though this is not a requirement.
License issues still exist.
README.source seems
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:33:09PM +, mezgani ali wrote:
updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it
Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info.
Please can you explain me this point ?
What is the problem with diff.gz ?
Did you read the description of
on the package users
by changing the package license.
- The Debian packaging is: Copyright (C) 2011? What about 2009?
debian/control: Description still starts from lowercase letters.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name wrote:
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:33:09PM +
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:36:40PM +, mezgani ali wrote:
Why may i rename my work to MIT ?
Because you have the copyright.
please explain , if i understand i have to remove GPL-3 and let the
package licence as is it
What should I explain?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 02:17:27PM +0100, With No Name wrote:
in the changes/upload file I have only those three files, but I need the
package_1.2.3.tar.gz
too. How do I do this?
Add -sa to the build command you use.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:12:27PM +0530, karunakar medamoni wrote:
i was uploaded one package scl-sandhi to mentors.debian.net please
check lintain errors and suggest me how to remove those error from my
package.
Did you read the descriptions of these tags?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 05:24:50PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
2012/12/22 Vincent Cheng vincentc1...@gmail.com:
dpkg-deb -x systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb .
This only lists the contents without unpacking:
deb -I systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb
ITYM dpkg-deb
Also, -c only lists the
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:59:11PM +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote:
dpkg-deb -x systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb .
This only lists the contents without unpacking:
deb -I systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb
ITYM dpkg-deb
Also, -c only lists the contents.
I was wondering about the same a
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 09:40:54PM +0300, Alexander Busorguin wrote:
It was caused by calls to Festival functions, for example: void
festival_tidy_up();
(because -lFestival is static-only)
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:29:49PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
It's ITA, not ITP, and you forgot to retitle and claim the bug..
I don't see how I'm supposed to do that?
I'm pasting in what I see when I run reportbug in an Emacs shell.
You use reportbug to report bugs. You use the email
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:45:42PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
I appreciate your time. I had tried the email to control as my first
method, but there was no response, no success or error.
That's strange. Make sure you've sent the email to the proper address.
So after reading through the debian
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:39:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
the watch file of the prospective package meme[1] is reporting a new
version but fails to download the latest version (4.9.0.4). It was
working nicely with version 4.9.0.3. I just get:
For the reference:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 03:57:57AM +, adrelanos wrote:
Many users having trouble downloading the (rather big) images. (Download
corruption, network breakdown...)
[...]
If it could be installed with a apt-get install whonix, that would be
much better than manually downloading.
Not really.
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 06:30:27AM +, adrelanos wrote:
Many users having trouble downloading the (rather big) images.
(Download
corruption, network breakdown...)
[...]
If it could be installed with a apt-get install whonix, that would
be
much better than manually downloading.
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 01:16:43PM +, adrelanos wrote:
Hash sum verification is easy these days [...]
For whom?
Certainly not for the average mortal user.
If they cannot run one console command, how can they use ISOs?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-audacious
* Package name: pidgin-audacious
Version : 2.0.0-3
Upstream Author : Yoshiki Yazawa y...@honeyplanet.jp
* URL :
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 07:15:40PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
This is just for copying files from debian/tmp to debian/package in the
case where you have multiple binary packages.
From debhelper compatibility level 7 on, dh_install will fall back to
looking in debian/tmp for files, if
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:49:47AM +0100, Alfonso Sabato Siciliano wrote:
Hi Mentors,
I have build my first package: $dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc
--source-option=--include-binaries
and I have my 3 packages: beret_1.2.1-1_amd64.deb,
beret-data_1.2.1-1_all.deb and
beret-dbg_1.2.1-1_amd64.deb.
1 - 100 of 1098 matches
Mail list logo
