On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 03:50:27AM +0530, Alan M Varghese wrote:
> What I meant was that upstream does not know where to put the copyright
> information or
> how it should be formatted. Or, to rephrase, is there a preferred format for
> a COPYRIGHT file
> in a project that uses LGPL?
There are
On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 12:38:00AM +0530, Alan M Varghese wrote:
> Hello Soren,
>
> Thank you for answering my queries.
>
> I will share this with the upstream project. The project authors are unsure
> how
> to do this for an LGPL project. I will see tomorrow if I can find an example
> of
> an
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 06:28:15AM +0100, earache_curtsy...@simplelogin.com
wrote:
> Hello Debian Mentors,
>
> I am a sysadmin who manages dozens of Debian servers. I also use Debian for
> my personal computing. I am very thankful to the Debian project and would
> love to give back to it
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 10:23:26PM +1100, David Bannon wrote:
> OK, my dput.cf has "fqdn = mentors.debian.net", I assumed that was that was
> for.
It has it in a section named "mentors" and you didn't tell dput to use
that section.
And https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers/ tells to both
On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 10:27:47AM +0100, Fab Stz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While packaging php-codeigniter-framework [1], I wanted to run the test suite
> specifically on PHP 8.2.
>
> Although I use the git repository as source of upstream as stated here in [2]
> I just noticed that the test suite
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:52:10PM +0530, probal basak wrote:
> I need one small help regarding debian packaging.
Do you intend to upload this to the official Debian archive?
> I have a watch file like this:
> version=4
>
> opts="mode=git, pgpmode=none" \
>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 01:20:19PM +0200, Fab Stz wrote:
> Ok I just tried this by adding dependent targets in d/rules.
You don't really need "dependent targets in d/rules" for this, just making
sure both builds run from the usual dh targets. In many cases this is done
by calling two build
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 01:12:07AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 09:57:31PM +0200, Fab Stz wrote:
> > > Why do you need bin-pkg-A for this? You already build it during the same
> > > build process. Do you 100% need the files installed into the s
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 09:57:31PM +0200, Fab Stz wrote:
> > Why do you need bin-pkg-A for this? You already build it during the same
> > build process. Do you 100% need the files installed into the system
> > locations?
>
> Unfortunately that's the way upstream works (it is to build Qt for
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 07:53:57PM +0200, Fab Stz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I already read a few times the page on the DEB_BUILD_PROFILES [1] but I still
> don't really get it on how it actually works when one package has a self
> dependency.
>
> I have a package, let's name it "src-pkg", that needs
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 05:25:27PM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> Thanks, Andrey. I have fixed this problem. v10.0,0 has just been uploaded
> to unstable - would you
> recommend releasing a new version 10.0.1 with these fixes, or is there a
> way of updating v10.0.0 ?
You can upload 10.0.0-2.
--
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:05:36AM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> My codec project uses SIMD code for x86 and AArch64 architectures. Also, as
> there are different versions of SIMD i.e. SSE vs AVX vs AVX2, the project
> uses a library that builds multiple versions of the accelerated code and
>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 08:49:53AM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> mips66el is not a target platform
What do you mean?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 08:37:34AM -0400, Aaron Boxer wrote:
> Here is the warning report
>
> https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=libgrokj2k
It happens on mips* in other packages too.
> I ran `readelf -l` on the .so, and I noticed that there is no E flag
> on the GNU_STACK entry. So, it
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:32:18AM +0200, Fab Stz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package B that depends on gradle, which depends on Java.
> B doesn't have a dependency to Java set in d/control.
>
> B runs a postinst script which requires Java.
"The Depends field should also be used if the postinst or
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 07:44:55AM +0200, Thomas Dettbarn wrote:
> Chipping in my 2 cents here...
>
>
>
> > On the "policy"/legal question of whether it's permissible to package
> > the internal open source in this larger source for the Debian project, I
> > have no specific opinion but it
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 09:34:57AM -0700, Steve M wrote:
> > > > > Successfully uploaded swift_5.6.2-1.dsc to mentors.debian.net for
> > > > > mentors.
> > > > Note that there is already a package called "swift" in the archive.
> > >
> > > This made me go look at the REJECTED e-mail again and I
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:23:51AM -0700, Steve M wrote:
> > > Successfully uploaded swift_5.6.2-1.dsc to mentors.debian.net for mentors.
> > Note that there is already a package called "swift" in the archive.
>
> This made me go look at the REJECTED e-mail again and I noticed it says
>
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:23:51AM -0700, Steve M wrote:
> > > Successfully uploaded swift_5.6.2-1.dsc to mentors.debian.net for mentors.
> > Note that there is already a package called "swift" in the archive.
>
> This made me go look at the REJECTED e-mail again and I noticed it says
>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:30:09PM -0700, Steve M wrote:
> My apologies for making another "my package won't show up" thread, but that is
> my problem and I can't figure it out. My package "swiftlang" takes about 3
> hours
> to build and uses about 23GiB of disk space, so that may play a role.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:41:06PM +0100, scupake wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I recently packaged bandcamp-dl and I am looking for someone to review
> and sponsor it, it is my first package for a Python program, so there
> might be some mistakes.
> Here's the link:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 02:32:43PM +, Thomas Ward wrote:
> When there's a rejected package there should be a rejection reason.
> That's where you should start. Don't be discouraged, I've had my
> packages rejected before (note: I'm not a mentor / DD, but I have been
> through this process
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 08:25:05PM +0200, David Given wrote:
> At first glance this seems a bit problematic, as it would require uploading
> packages which haven't been reviewed by a human. I'd be relying on the
> automation to spot any potential problems. But, if the packaging's not
> changing
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 08:18:43PM +0200, Jose G. López wrote:
> I'm working on importing a new upstream version for scid package and I want
> to get rid of "national-encoding" lintian warning.
Are you sure converting that file is useful and won't break the software for the
use cases when this
On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 08:04:15PM +0100, Emyr Williams wrote:
> Hi Anu,
>
> How can we replicate the conditions? Your e-mail isn't clear, what compiler
> arguments did you use? And what metrics are you using to measure memory
> usage?
Please note that debian-mentors is not a good place for such
On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 07:53:40PM +0900, Makoto Yamashita wrote:
> Dear whom it may concern,
>
> Thank you very much for reading my email.
> I am a maintainer of the SDPA package and I am trying to
> upload a modified file, but I received the following mail.
Upload where?
--
WBR, wRAR
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 02:56:14PM +, Lance Lin wrote:
> Hi Bastian,
>
> > You need Breaks: and Replaces: on the libworkflow0 package.
>
> Sorry to bother you about this but I am still having a very hard time.
>
> I've tried to search on my own and look at Debian resources:
>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:01:42PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> my package yosys has a test failure on mips64el that I can't figure out and
> consequently got removed from testing. I'm wondering how to deal with this?
>
> From reading the policy it seems I can use the Architecture field to list
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 03:54:05PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> I'm very sorry! Looking at the build log I don't see a line containing the
> string "Arch type".
Exactly.
> Please Could you go into detail?
I think you should re-read your previous emails.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 01:43:12PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> > > I had a look at the manual page. The build log (see both links)
> > > makes a difference between "Arch type" and "Build type".
> > Does it?
> > Do you mean "Build Architecture" instead?
> >
>
> No. Have a look at the links I
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 01:20:34PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> > You can use the "--arch-all --no-arch-any" combination of options
> > (--no-arch-any being the important part). Generally speaking, sbuild
> > provides a lot of useful options, I encourage you to read its man page
> > so you get an
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:31:22PM +0200, Philippe SWARTVAGHER wrote:
> - dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: can't extract name and version from library
> name 'libdia.so'
I think you can ignore these.
> - W: dia source: debian-rules-sets-DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS (line 10)
>
> Parallel builds may cause a build
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 07:17:11PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> > > But if use the same way to apply patch into d/*, sometime it will get:
> > Patches shouldn't patch files in debian/. Edit the files directly.
>
>
> Understood it. here is SO[0] to hint it.
>
> But this is inconvenient:
*shrug*
> * if
On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 06:57:27PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I followed the instructions[0]&[1] to generate/apply patch. It is ok if i
> the patch file be applied out of debian/*.:
>
> // for people who if need it
> *quilt push -a
> * quilt new fix-issue.patch
> * quilt add
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 09:45:56AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> I'm about to backport opencpn from Sid to backports-sloppy, running into
> versioning problems.
>
> The Sid version is 5.6.2+dfsg-1. The sloppy version should then be something
> like 5.6.2+dfsg-1~bpo10.1.
>
> However, it has been
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 08:17:15AM +0200, Markus Blatt wrote:
> I am currently preparing/testing Debian packages of the upcoming OPM release
> by uploading them to experimental. I noted that packages for both hppa and
> riscv64
> are failing for this release of opm-common [1] that did build
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 10:32:05PM +0200, Tino Mettler wrote:
> > You have actually configured it in the package, so it would be better if
> > it actually works. :) Try just running `autopkgtest` in the source
> > directory..
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/autopkgtest
>
>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 02:49:42PM +0200, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > ncdu (1.16-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> Is it really urgency=medium? low wouldn't fit?
medium is the default urgency since Nov 2013.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:53:53AM +0800, あきら wrote:
> Hellow,
> I'm new to debian packaging, so I have a question troubling me for a long
> time, which is about debuild -Inothing, what does this do, and its effect.
What is the context of this question? If you don't know what is this,
don't use
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 04:02:14PM +0800, Miao Wang wrote:
> >> I intended to leave it UNRELEASED so it can serve as a request for
> >> comment. However, every time I upload an UNRELEASED package, it gets
> >> deleted automatically. As a result, I have to set the codename to unstable
> >> for
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:36:31PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > > Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of
> > > packages that have new
> > > binary
> > > packages i.e. name change during an update? Specifically to the
> > > new/by-hand queue.
> > Can you explain
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:37:33PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > > Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of
> > > packages that have new
> > > binary
> > > packages i.e. name change during an update? Specifically to the
> > > new/by-hand queue.
> >
> > Dunno where
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:02:07PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> Could someone point me to the documentation that relates to upload of
> packages that have new binary
> packages i.e. name change during an update? Specifically to the new/by-hand
> queue.
Can you explain the context for this? You
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 07:56:20AM +, Peymaneh wrote:
> Originally, the app would download the whole container image at first use
> after Installation. For the new version upstream has decided to include
> build a whole Container-Image at build time and include the 700MB image in
> the .deb
On Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 02:25:37PM -0400, Noah Sombrero wrote:
> I installed deb 11.3 on my old toshiba satellite laptop (p25 s509),
> yes p4, 1.25 gb ram. It should work, and it does except that the
> display is offset to the top and the right. I have not found any
> reference on the web that
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 03:54:35PM +0200, Daniel Gröber wrote:
> Hi debian-mentors,
>
> I'm working on packaging [vpp] which installs a number of shared libraries
> that may want to be used by other Debian packages in the future.
>
> [vpp]: https://github.com/fdio/vpp/
>
> However upstream just
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 02:41:08PM +, Eivind Naess wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> I don't mind becoming a debian maintainer at all. In fact, I've maintained
> these packages for Ubuntu over almost a decade. It would indeed be simpler
> for me to maintain these for Debian and it to be adopted by
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:01:07PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 05:34:57PM +, Eivind Naess wrote:
> > I have a packages made ready which would close both 1006705 and 671296
> > - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 05:34:57PM +, Eivind Naess wrote:
> I have a packages made ready which would close both 1006705 and 671296
> - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671296
> - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006705
>
> The GIT repository is here:
> - git
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 06:31:27PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> > > > > vimer@debian:~/git/jimtcl$ sudo dpkg-gensymbols -pjimtcl0.79 >
> > > > > symbols.diff
> > > > > dpkg-gensymbols: warning: new libraries appeared in the symbols file:
> > > > > libjim.so.0.81
> > > > > dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 04:32:32PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> > > vimer@debian:~/git/jimtcl$ sudo dpkg-gensymbols -pjimtcl0.79 >
> > > symbols.diff
> > > dpkg-gensymbols: warning: new libraries appeared in the symbols file:
> > > libjim.so.0.81
> > > dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some libraries
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:50:48PM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> vimer@debian:~/git/jimtcl$ sudo dpkg-gensymbols -pjimtcl0.79 > symbols.diff
> dpkg-gensymbols: warning: new libraries appeared in the symbols file:
> libjim.so.0.81
> dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some libraries disappeared in the symbols file:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:02:03AM +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> But there are some situations that are unclean for me:
> If you file an ITS bug, that is mean the package's new(co-) packages are
> you.
Sure, ITS means you want to maintain the package.
"I want the package to be updated but don't want to
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:25:53PM -0300, Lourisvaldo Figueredo Junior wrote:
> I have a doubt. In cases where the upstream uses the MS-DOS pattern CRLF
> ("\r\n") to end of line, instead Unix pattern LF ("\n").
> In this situation, should the maintainer make a patch converting this files
> to
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 08:59:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> For whatever reason automake puts LDFLAGS before "-o pngcomp"
This is correct.
> instead of after and the last options are obtained from the LIBS variable.
This is correct.
> I have no idea how to tweak this sequence.
You don't
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:30:35PM +0100, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> I plan to publish (at least) 4 Debian packages.
>
> The format is ideal for my users to install, and the .deb format takes care
> of installing .info files at the right place, something I find impossible to
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 11:44:46AM +0800, Yunmei Li wrote:
> I am new to building deb packages, and I would like some help with a
> question.
> I am trying to build a deb package for Milvus(https://milvus.io/) on
> Ubuntu18.04 or Ubuntu 20.04. Building Milvus requires Cmake 3.18 or higher,
> but
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Filip Hroch wrote:
> I'm attempting to upload Fitspng into ftp-master, unfortunately, without any
> success. Moreover, I haven't received any message why the upload has been
> rejected, or anything else.
When a valid signature is not found the uploader
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 09:14:08AM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> yesterday I uploaded dvisvgm_2.13-1 to the archive. For any unknown reason I
> deleted the changelog entry for version 2.12-4 from the d/changelog file,
> this version is currently in testing. I tried to cancel the upload using
>
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 10:31:38AM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> > When I look at the package tracker https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/opm-common
> > I see "unsatisfied dependency on libfmt7 (>= 7.1.3+ds1)" that is blocking
> > migration to testing. Current version of libfmt in unstable is
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:23:51PM -0800, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> I guess ITP bugs are common practice for new packages... but are they
> *required* by anything?
No. But your sponsor is likely to request you to file one before
sponsoring.
> It seems like fairly high-friction, low-value work -
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:43:21AM +, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > > Brilliant, thank you Juri! Did you add this to the UpstreamGuide wiki at
> > > all?
> > Why would it be useful on that page?
>
> For me it was like the difference between reading a computer science
> book and source code. Juri's
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 07:21:47PM +, Gavin Henry wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've created https://salsa.debian.org/ghenry/sentrypeer as an import
> from my main GitHub repo.
>
> If I wanted to follow the pattern of:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-voip-team/libosip2
>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 09:31:18PM +, Gavin Henry wrote:
> > Sorry, it's just small overview, how I do it.
>
> Brilliant, thank you Juri! Did you add this to the UpstreamGuide wiki at all?
Why would it be useful on that page?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Having a source package named "qt6" build Android-specific packages sounds
wrong to me. Is this intended to contain the normal Qt source code and so
be a duplicate of normal Qt packages?
This question would be asked in the ITP bug for this package but it
doesn't seem to have one...
--
WBR, wRAR
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 05:47:19PM +0330, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> > > https://packages.debian.org/stretch/zekr Project is a powerful and useful
> > > project in Quran. But its maintainer was released it. I contact with him,
> > > and decide to build deb for debian repo and rpm for fedora and
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 08:56:30AM +0330, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
> https://packages.debian.org/stretch/zekr Project is a powerful and useful
> project in Quran. But its maintainer was released it. I contact with him,
> and decide to build deb for debian repo and rpm for fedora and zst for
>
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:56:26PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > But I was told to "using rm_conffile directive from .maintscript file"
> > This is wrong. rm_conffile is only for cases when a conffile is no longer
> > shipped. This is explained in dpkg-maintscript-helper(1). But
> >
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 01:03:10PM -0500, pkgoyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 12:53 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:40:06PM -0500, wrote:
> > > > > Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-h
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:57:37PM -0500, pkgoyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> > > > > How to do that please?
> > > > The correct way, it seems, would be to follow the suggestion in the
> > > > original bug report and fix the "rm -f /etc/dnsmasq.d/dbab.*" line in
> > > > the 1.3.3-1 postrm.
> > >
> >
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 12:40:06PM -0500, pkgoyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> > > Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a
> > > warning?
> > Have you read its description?
>
> Please don't overestimate my ability to decrypt the description.
> If I understand what it is
On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 11:49:32AM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> Why `maintainer-script-should-not-use-dpkg-maintscript-helper` is a warning?
Have you read its description?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:19:44AM -0500, pkgoyq@neverbox.com wrote:
> > > > You should remove them manually in postrm, but only on
> > > > purge.
> > >
> > But now you will need to also recover from a bad state
> > left by upgrades to 1.5.7-1.
>
> Ah... it is getting more and more
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:29:58PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > You should remove them manually in postrm, but only on
> > purge.
>
> How to do that please?
The correct way, it seems, would be to follow the suggestion in the
original bug report and fix the "rm -f /etc/dnsmasq.d/dbab.*" line in
the
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:09:35PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> OK, I want to remove all conffile files and reinstall the new ones
> when doing package upgrade, as there isn't much user intervention to
> those conffile files. All are provided by the package.
Then they shouldn't be conffiles and
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 10:46:43AM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problem with my conffile files, see
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995769
>
> I.e.,
>
>
> grep: /etc/dbab/dbab.list-: No such file or directory
> cat: /etc/dbab/dbab.addr: No such file or
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 03:23:34PM -0500, S. 7 wrote:
> I have decided to package the newest version of LXQt (including libfm-qt),
> as such, this bug report no longer has relevance.
In that case you should close it.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:45:37PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> My package cannot be upgraded from current version to latest version
> -- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995769
>
> It might have something to do with obsoleted conffile files or it
> might even not. The problem is,
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 01:45:49PM +0100, Giulio Paci wrote:
> Moreover I am still wondering if the compiler behavior is correct in this
> case and why it is so unstable.
It's correct when you don't care about the amount of precision, and it's
unstable for the reasons described in gcc(1) for the
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 01:13:20PM +0100, Giulio Paci wrote:
> The double values refer to timing information. The specific format,
> known as CTM, stores information in seconds in decimals (e.g. "30.66"
> seconds) from the beginning of the stream.
> The failing tool reads this information into
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 06:38:07PM +0100, Giulio Paci wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> while updating SCTK package I enabled the execution of the test suite
> which was previously disabled. The tests are working fine on x86_64
> architecture, but a couple of them are failing on i386.
> After
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 01:21:24PM +, Lars Gohr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to publish semv (https://github.com/elgohr/semv).
>
> Semv is a CLI tool, written in Go, that makes it easy to work with semantic
> versions.
> In this way semantic versions can be compared and incremented (which
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:24:29PM +, Kerry wrote:
> I get a binary .deb in the parent directory of my application directory.
> I would like to change this so that all .debs are placed in a different
> directory so I tried overriding 'dh_builddeb' in 'rules':
d/rules is a wrong place for this,
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:02:21PM -0500, Hunter Wittenborn wrote:
> Part of the packaging process for our program includes running Git
> commands to get things like the timestamp for when some files were last
> modified, which are used in things like the building of man pages via
> Asciidoc to
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:27:51PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> To give a brief history, Debian had "getmail" which was based on
> Python2 and was removed. Then there was a fork available named
> "getmail6" which was based on Python3. A transitional package linked
> them by
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:35:34PM +0900, notebook wrote:
>
> > > [Me]
> > > It looks like becoming a maintainer requires 40+ hours to go through all
> > > the "must read" articles and becoming accustomed to every procedure and
> > > guideline.
>
> > [Andrey]
> > Actually, even providing a
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:20:11PM +0900, notebook wrote:
> > [Andrey Rahmatullin:]
> > If, on the other hand, you just want
> > that the package in Debian uses your updated code, you don't need to (and
> > can't) do anything in addition to what you already did.
>
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 04:25:44PM +0900, notebook wrote:
> Hello Andrey:
>
> Thank you for your reply!
>
> > As the package is already in Debian, you need to contact its current
> > maintainer(s) (though I see you already filed #982343).
>
> I contacted the current maintainers. They are too
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:58:16PM +0900, notebook wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm working on the "Gjiten" package* ([1]). It was kind of abandoned and used
> Gtk2.
> I upgraded it to Gtk3 and did some further development on it (see [2]).
>
> I'd like to get the new codebase into the debian repos.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 05:26:42PM +0800, clay stan wrote:
> I'm packaging a package. This package requires the kernel to load the
> zram module to use it.
> How can I implement it?
One option is documenting it in a README.Debian.
> The way I can think of is to use "modporbe -r zram" in postinst
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:20:48AM +, Ryan McClue wrote:
> Upon running dpkg-buildpackage, I get: dh: error: Unknown sequence
> application (choose from: binary binary-arch binary-indep build
> build-arch build-indep clean install install-arch install-indep)
How are you running it?
--
WBR,
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 05:22:26AM +, Ryan McClue wrote:
> At a high level I understand that the debian/rules file instructs
> debhelper as to how to build your package. However, I'm confused
> regarding these two points:
This may be true in some way but to me it sounds like a wrong layering.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:41:03PM +0200, Leon Styhre wrote:
> Thank you for your quick reply!
>
> Yes there is a software package automatically generated when creating a
> release on GitLab.
> For example
>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:25:05AM +0200, Leon Styhre wrote:
> I'm a little bit lost though regarding the process, should I go ahead and
> create a Request For Sponsor report right away, or should I first get in
> contact with someone in the Debian Games team for example?
First you should create a
On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 05:22:46PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> TL;DR How do I get an accepted change into Salsa?
>
> About a month ago I got my first package change accepted on
> mentors.debian.net. The sponsor pushed it to the Debian FTP server, and
> I can see that the package is available
On Sun, Jul 04, 2021 at 10:42:06PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Unrelated to this, the package uses -mmmx -avx, is this an RC bug or is
> all code compiled with those flags only enabled at the run time on CPUs
> supporting them?
I see this is already filed as #924009. I'll fix the
On Sun, Jul 04, 2021 at 01:28:05PM +0200, François Mazen wrote:
> > Can you publish the build log or at least make the repo buildable?
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, the repo is buildable. See salsa CI [1] and
> associated build-log [2].
Not sure how does that work, as gbp requires the
On Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 09:59:30PM +0200, François Mazen wrote:
> Dear Mentors,
>
> I'm updating the freefem++ package to 4.9 release [1] and I get
> hardening-no-bindnow lintian warnings on several binary outputs [2].
>
> Of course the appropriate variable is set in debian/rules (export
>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:11:04PM +0100, Abhishek Dutta wrote:
> * Package name: fii
> Version : 1.0.0
> Upstream Author : Abhishek Dutta
> * URL : https://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~vgg/software/fii/
> * License : BSD-2-clause
> Description : FII is a command
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 03:30:41AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> What is the typical way one would go about adopting a package?
If you mean an orphaned one, just upload it with you as the maintainer, in
addition to the O bug management described at
https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l3
> I've
1 - 100 of 1098 matches
Mail list logo
