Hello,
I also uploaded a lablgl built with it, and will follow with a lablgtk2
probably.
lablgtkmathview won't build any more since since we (upstream) have not
ported it yet to lablgtk2. [It is not a trivial task since lablgtkmathview
is a widget and internally lablgtk2 is quite different
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 09:03:48PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
o the objinfo patch. May well be included in the next (3.08?) release
though.
What do tuo mean with objinfo patch? If you mean the patch that change
Well,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:00:09PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Selon Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
o the objinfo patch. May well be included in the next (3.08?) release
though.
What do tuo mean with objinfo
Selon Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just download the package source and look at it, everything will become
clear.
As said, the rest of the patches are no more needed, because integrated
upstream.
Alright. Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hello,
I just released ocaml 3.06.99.beta2-2 to :
http://people.debian.org/~luther/ocaml
This contains the fix to the emacs problem (thanks to Jerome Marant for
providing the fix). And some further cleanup of the patches.
Once 3.07 ships, there will be only 2 minor patches left, which is a
Hello,
I also uploaded a lablgl built with it, and will follow with a lablgtk2
probably.
lablgtkmathview won't build any more since since we (upstream) have not
ported it yet to lablgtk2. [It is not a trivial task since lablgtkmathview
is a widget and internally lablgtk2 is quite different
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:38:29PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
Hello,
I also uploaded a lablgl built with it, and will follow with a lablgtk2
probably.
lablgtkmathview won't build any more since since we (upstream) have not
ported it yet to lablgtk2. [It is not a trivial
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
o the objinfo patch. May well be included in the next (3.08?) release
though.
What do tuo mean with objinfo patch? If you mean the patch that change
the executable name it's ok to wait for it. But if you mean the patch
that add
Selon Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
o the objinfo patch. May well be included in the next (3.08?) release
though.
What do tuo mean with objinfo patch? If you mean the patch that change
the executable name it's ok to
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 09:03:48PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 07:05:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
o the objinfo patch. May well be included in the next (3.08?) release
though.
What do tuo mean with objinfo patch? If you mean the patch that change
Well,
Selon Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just download the package source and look at it, everything will become
clear.
As said, the rest of the patches are no more needed, because integrated
upstream.
Alright. Thanks.
--
Jérôme Marant
11 matches
Mail list logo