-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:20:29 +0200
Source: ulex
Binary: ocaml-ulex
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The doc subdirectory is no longer there, however ...
What was the response of the ocaml team about this ?
I haven't asked.
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hello,
There are a few additional pieces of ocaml software which would be
interesting to package as part of debian, but for which we manifestely
don't have the manpower for it.
Should we start filling RFP bugreports against wnpp for them, in hope of
attracting new ocaml maintainers, or
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:10:56AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
It seems that debhelper is somewhat buggy, since it tries to build
ocaml-native-compilers even on arches that do not support it, resulting
in ocaml failing to build on those.
I have filled a bug report about this and will
Mmm, SVN seems broken :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/SVN/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocaml$ svn ci
svn: Couldn't find a repository
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: No repository found in
'svn+ssh://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/svn/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocaml'
svn: Berkeley DB error
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:04:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
What do you think about it, Stefano ? I think you are among us the most
able to give an opinion on it, since you package other network oriented
stuff.
I've looked at it just after the first release and I didn't like it.
Basically it
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
What was the response of the ocaml team about this ?
None, yet.
In case of problem we should have to split the bignum library from the
ocaml package ...
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna,
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:30:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Could you add ara to the list of ocaml related packages that the list is
subscribed to the PTS ?
Done.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
What was the response of the ocaml team about this ?
None, yet.
In case of problem we should have to split the bignum library from the
ocaml package ...
Who's going to ask? Shall
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
What was the response of the ocaml team about this ?
None, yet.
In case of problem we should have to split the bignum library from the
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml is not nice, lot of work, and i don't feel
upto it, not in the short time that is.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:47:33AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:21:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Should we start filling RFP bugreports against wnpp for them, in hope
of attracting new ocaml maintainers, or potential maintainers ?
No, I don't think so. RFP
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:52:26AM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote:
Marc Santoro have already ask it on the main caml list (see
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=fa.eog9aum.1qle0i4%40ifi.uio.no).
So we may wait a little.
I've just read Xavier's response, it's actually a problem indeed: BigNum
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml is not nice, lot of work, and i don't feel
upto it, not in the short
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
You don't need to split it: just remove it entirely and add a comment
in README.Debian.
Calm down :)
Yes, you're right, we can't ship ocaml as it is right now. OTOH BigNum
is really an important library and IMO we should do our
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:42:56AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
You don't need to split it: just remove it entirely and add a comment
in README.Debian.
Calm down :)
Yes, you're right, we can't ship ocaml as it is right
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:01:47AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mmm, SVN seems broken :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/SVN/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocaml$ svn ci
svn: Couldn't find a repository
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: No
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But, this will happen only after the testing migration is completed, so,
as said, business as usual, there will still be time to make high
priority cleanup later on, if it is needed.
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Err, no, we must not allow ocaml 3.07 to enter testing if it violates
policy. Either we get a new license from HP or we repackage ocaml.
Debian policy is not secondary.
Actually ocaml 3.06 have exactly the same problem (cfr
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Err, no, we must not allow ocaml 3.07 to enter testing if it violates
policy. Either we get a new license from HP or we repackage ocaml.
Debian policy is not secondary.
Actually
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But, this will happen only after the testing migration is completed, so,
as said, business as usual, there will still be time to make high
priority cleanup later on, if it is needed.
Err, no, we must not allow
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
For info, Bdale forwarded my mail to the people who can handle this at
HP, so
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
I append the TODO list, sorted as we did on last thursday.
Uhm, you posted just the list of packages; while we discussed also other
TODOs not related to packaging new softwares ...
Package: extlib
You can remove this one, I've
Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I append the TODO list, sorted as we did on last thursday.
Could we put the TODO list on svn ? So we could edit it. We could also
had a field to tell who is working on it (If there is someone).
--
Rémi Vanicat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
*
Not interesting :
*
Package: ant-ocaml
URL: http://www-mgi.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~blume/Download.html
Authors:
Description: Typesetting system inspired by TeX
Hey, ant is great, i almost
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 08:38:34PM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote:
Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I append the TODO list, sorted as we did on last thursday.
Could we put the TODO list on svn ? So we could edit it. We could also
had a field to tell who is working on it
Hello,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 08:38:34PM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote:
Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I append the TODO list, sorted as we did on last thursday.
Could we put the TODO list on svn ? So we could edit it. We could also
had a field to tell who is
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
*
Not interesting :
*
Package: ant-ocaml
URL: http://www-mgi.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~blume/Download.html
Authors:
Hello,
I am working on cameleon.
In order to make the META work, i need to split the /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07/cameleon
in many small pieces ( report, ocamlcvs, configwin et al ).
Is anyone, depending on this library :
- libreport-ocaml-dev
- libocamlcvs-ocaml-dev
- libconfigwin-ocaml-dev
-
Quoting Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I am working on cameleon.
In order to make the META work, i need to split the
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.07/cameleon
in many small pieces ( report, ocamlcvs, configwin et al ).
Please _do not_ change the package layout now. Try to make it
build
Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could we put the TODO list on svn ? So we could edit it. We could also
had a field to tell who is working on it (If there is someone).
No problem, for uploading it to svn. Just tell me where ! ( i think it
could go with the policy, since it is
In order to make the META work, i need to split the /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07/cameleon
in many small pieces ( report, ocamlcvs, configwin et al ).
If I understand the problem correctly, I do not think so.
You can just install several META.packagename (e.g. in /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07)
and have all of
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:29:13PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I am working on cameleon.
In order to make the META work, i need to split the
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.07/cameleon
in many small pieces ( report, ocamlcvs, configwin et al
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:23:25PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
In order to make the META work, i need to split the /usr/lib/ocaml/3.07/cameleon
in many small pieces ( report, ocamlcvs, configwin et al ).
If I understand the problem correctly, I do not think so.
You can just
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:14:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
*
Not interesting :
*
Package: ant-ocaml
URL:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:58:44PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:29:13PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I am working on cameleon.
In order to make the META work, i need to split the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:43:05 +0200
Source: ulex
Binary: ocaml-ulex
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:20:29 +0200
Source: ulex
Binary: ocaml-ulex
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The doc subdirectory is no longer there, however ...
What was the response of the ocaml team about this ?
I haven't asked.
--
Jérôme Marant
Hello,
There are a few additional pieces of ocaml software which would be
interesting to package as part of debian, but for which we manifestely
don't have the manpower for it.
Should we start filling RFP bugreports against wnpp for them, in hope of
attracting new ocaml maintainers, or
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:10:56AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
It seems that debhelper is somewhat buggy, since it tries to build
ocaml-native-compilers even on arches that do not support it, resulting
in ocaml failing to build on those.
I have filled a bug report about this and will
Mmm, SVN seems broken :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/SVN/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocaml$ svn ci
svn: Couldn't find a repository
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: No repository found in
'svn+ssh://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/svn/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocaml'
svn: Berkeley DB error
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:04:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
What do you think about it, Stefano ? I think you are among us the most
able to give an opinion on it, since you package other network oriented
stuff.
I've looked at it just after the first release and I didn't like it.
Basically it
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
What was the response of the ocaml team about this ?
None, yet.
In case of problem we should have to split the bignum library from the
ocaml package ...
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna,
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:30:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Could you add ara to the list of ocaml related packages that the list is
subscribed to the PTS ?
Done.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mmm, SVN seems broken :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/SVN/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocaml$ svn ci
svn: Couldn't find a repository
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: No repository found in
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:21:23AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Should we start filling RFP bugreports against wnpp for them, in hope
of attracting new ocaml maintainers, or potential maintainers ?
No, I don't think so. RFP are for users interested in a package, using
them to state that, as a
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
What was the response of the ocaml team about this ?
None, yet.
In case of problem we should have to split the bignum library from the
ocaml package ...
Who's going to ask? Shall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 09:07:42 +0200
Source: ocaml
Binary: ocaml-base ocaml-source ocaml ocaml-native-compilers
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.07-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
What was the response of the ocaml team about this ?
None, yet.
In case of problem we should have to split the bignum library from the
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml is not nice, lot of work, and i don't feel
upto it, not in the short time that is.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:52:26AM +0200, Remi Vanicat wrote:
Marc Santoro have already ask it on the main caml list (see
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=fa.eog9aum.1qle0i4%40ifi.uio.no).
So we may wait a little.
I've just read Xavier's response, it's actually a problem indeed: BigNum
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml is not nice, lot of work, and i don't feel
upto it, not in the short
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
You don't need to split it: just remove it entirely and add a comment
in README.Debian.
Calm down :)
Yes, you're right, we can't ship ocaml as it is right now. OTOH BigNum
is really an important library and IMO we should do our
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:42:56AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
You don't need to split it: just remove it entirely and add a comment
in README.Debian.
Calm down :)
Yes, you're right, we can't ship ocaml as it is right
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:01:47AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mmm, SVN seems broken :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/SVN/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocaml$ svn ci
svn: Couldn't find a repository
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: No
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:16:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:01:47AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mmm, SVN seems broken :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/SVN/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocaml$ svn ci
svn: Couldn't find a
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But, this will happen only after the testing migration is completed, so,
as said, business as usual, there will still be time to make high
priority cleanup later on, if it is needed.
Err, no, we must not allow ocaml 3.07 to enter testing if it violates
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nope, no luck :
$ svnadmin recover ~/debian/SVN/pkg-ocaml-maint
Acquiring exclusive lock on repository db.
Recovery is running, please stand by...svn: Unsupported repository
version
svn: Expected version '2' of repository; found no version at all;
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
For info, Bdale forwarded my mail to the people who can handle this at
HP, so
62 matches
Mail list logo
