On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
package to be processed. I've also to wait before uploading findlib
1.0.1 for this issue.
Why not just upload it ?
I've just found another reason :-(
Latest findlib is bugged in that it no longer recognizes META.pkg
METAS. This
Hello,
Well, we encountered a build problem in advi, which seems to be related
to cameleon's linkage of libpng10 and lablgtk.
I don't remember what the situation is exactly, but i remember that
libpng10 was to be used with lablgtk1, and libpng12 was to be used with
lablgtk2 and that cameleon is
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I thus propose the following plan, and an alternative plan below it :
Plan A:
- we rename lablgtk2 to lablgtk, and it becomes our default lablgtk.
- lablgtk2 is linked with libpng12.
- camlimage is built with it.
- we rename current
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:17:52 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Well, we encountered a build problem in advi, which seems to be related
to cameleon's linkage of libpng10 and lablgtk.
I don't remember what the situation is exactly, but i remember that
libpng10 was to be used
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:28:32PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:17:52 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Well, we encountered a build problem in advi, which seems to be related
to cameleon's linkage of libpng10 and lablgtk.
I don't remember
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:17:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
Well, we encountered a build problem in advi, which seems to be related
to cameleon's linkage of libpng10 and lablgtk.
I don't remember what the situation is exactly, but i remember that
libpng10 was to be used with
I think it is best to keep the current naming scheme ie lablgtk,
lablgtk2, camlimages...
I think it is bet to generate camlimages2.
Off course it should be best to move to lablgtk2 - lablgtk... But there
is always people assuming lablgtk is lablgtk...
I second you in this point,
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:28:32PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:17:52 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Well, we encountered a build problem in advi, which seems to be related
to cameleon's linkage of libpng10 and lablgtk.
I don't remember
Heu, cameleon (the main trunk) depends on lablgtk1, not lablgtk2.
Yeah, sure, was a typo.
That's what i thought, but this detail was the subject of the discussion,
so I pointed it to be sure ;-)
And it is not done, yet. It is started in a separated branch, named ...
lablgtk2 :-)
and,
Hi,
I do not really see the point of renaming lablgtk2 to lablgtk.
Other gtk/gnome-based packages are now called *2.
What about this alternative proposal?
1. add a new package camlimages1 linked against lablgtk.
2. make cameleon depend on camlimages1
3. link camlimages to lablgtk2
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:08:05PM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
Hi,
I do not really see the point of renaming lablgtk2 to lablgtk.
Other gtk/gnome-based packages are now called *2.
What about this alternative proposal?
1. add a new package camlimages1 linked against
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:35:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:49:12PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I thus propose the following plan, and an alternative plan below it :
Plan A:
- we rename lablgtk2 to
Hello again all,
Well, since i am in a good mood ( ;-) ), i would like to do a full round
of package injection in the svn.
What i will do :
- inject the .orig.tar.gz
- inject the debian
- tags the current trunk to the version ( for example cameleon will get
a 1.3-2 tags )
- add a watch file
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:35:45PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:08:05PM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
Hi,
I do not really see the point of renaming lablgtk2 to lablgtk.
Other gtk/gnome-based packages are now called *2.
What about this
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:10:01PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
What is cameleon's exact dependency on camlimages anyway ?
Well, none. Cameleon does not use camlimages.
Oh.
So cool, we can do :
lablgtk2 - camlimage - advi.
lablgtk1 - cameleon.
Nice. Sylvain, no need for
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:32:09PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:10:01PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
What is cameleon's exact dependency on camlimages anyway ?
Well, none. Cameleon does not use camlimages.
Oh.
So cool, we can do :
lablgtk2 -
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:19:57PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still no news from it :-(
I have put a watch on Rene Engelhard on my ICQ list... When he will be
back online, i will try to get him...
At this stage, i am passing PP since 6
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:19:57PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
- your AM is your only entry point to the NM process, which means
this is not true. If you have a justified complaint about the process
then you may always contact frontdesk (actually tbm), and he will try
to clear out the problem.
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
package to be processed. I've also to wait before uploading findlib
1.0.1 for this issue.
Why not just upload it ?
I've just found another reason :-(
Latest findlib is bugged in that it no longer recognizes META.pkg
METAS. This
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:17:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Plan A:
- we rename lablgtk2 to lablgtk, and it becomes our default lablgtk.
- lablgtk2 is linked with libpng12.
- camlimage is built with it.
- we rename current lablgtk as lablgtk1 for compatibility reasons.
- cameleon
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:17:52 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Well, we encountered a build problem in advi, which seems to be related
to cameleon's linkage of libpng10 and lablgtk.
I don't remember what the situation is exactly, but i remember that
libpng10 was to be used
Hello,
Well, we encountered a build problem in advi, which seems to be related
to cameleon's linkage of libpng10 and lablgtk.
I don't remember what the situation is exactly, but i remember that
libpng10 was to be used with lablgtk1, and libpng12 was to be used with
lablgtk2 and that cameleon is
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I thus propose the following plan, and an alternative plan below it :
Plan A:
- we rename lablgtk2 to lablgtk, and it becomes our default lablgtk.
- lablgtk2 is linked with libpng12.
- camlimage is built with it.
- we rename current
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:17:52PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
Well, we encountered a build problem in advi, which seems to be related
to cameleon's linkage of libpng10 and lablgtk.
I don't remember what the situation is exactly, but i remember that
libpng10 was to be used with
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:28:32PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:17:52 +0100
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Well, we encountered a build problem in advi, which seems to be related
to cameleon's linkage of libpng10 and lablgtk.
I don't remember
I think it is best to keep the current naming scheme ie lablgtk,
lablgtk2, camlimages...
I think it is bet to generate camlimages2.
Off course it should be best to move to lablgtk2 - lablgtk... But there
is always people assuming lablgtk is lablgtk...
I second you in this point,
Hi,
I do not really see the point of renaming lablgtk2 to lablgtk.
Other gtk/gnome-based packages are now called *2.
What about this alternative proposal?
1. add a new package camlimages1 linked against lablgtk.
2. make cameleon depend on camlimages1
3. link camlimages to lablgtk2
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:49:12PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I thus propose the following plan, and an alternative plan below it :
Plan A:
- we rename lablgtk2 to lablgtk, and it becomes our default lablgtk.
- lablgtk2 is linked with
Heu, cameleon (the main trunk) depends on lablgtk1, not lablgtk2.
Yeah, sure, was a typo.
That's what i thought, but this detail was the subject of the discussion,
so I pointed it to be sure ;-)
And it is not done, yet. It is started in a separated branch, named ...
lablgtk2 :-)
and,
Hello again all,
Well, since i am in a good mood ( ;-) ), i would like to do a full round
of package injection in the svn.
What i will do :
- inject the .orig.tar.gz
- inject the debian
- tags the current trunk to the version ( for example cameleon will get
a 1.3-2 tags )
- add a watch file
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:08:05PM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
Hi,
I do not really see the point of renaming lablgtk2 to lablgtk.
Other gtk/gnome-based packages are now called *2.
What about this alternative proposal?
1. add a new package camlimages1 linked against
What about :
camlimages ( normal )
camlimages-lablgtk ( just contains the part linked with lablgtk )
camlimages-lablgtk2 ( just contains the part linked with lablgtk2 )
camlimages-lablgtk conflicts with camlimages-lablgtk2
During the build you begin to build with lablgtk, then
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:35:45PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:08:05PM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
Hi,
I do not really see the point of renaming lablgtk2 to lablgtk.
Other gtk/gnome-based packages are now called *2.
What about this
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:35:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 05:49:12PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I thus propose the following plan, and an alternative plan below it :
Plan A:
- we rename lablgtk2 to
What is cameleon's exact dependency on camlimages anyway ?
Well, none. Cameleon does not use camlimages.
- Maxence
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:10:01PM +0100, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
What is cameleon's exact dependency on camlimages anyway ?
Well, none. Cameleon does not use camlimages.
Oh.
So cool, we can do :
lablgtk2 - camlimage - advi.
lablgtk1 - cameleon.
Nice. Sylvain, no need for
Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still no news from it :-(
I have put a watch on Rene Engelhard on my ICQ list... When he will be
back online, i will try to get him...
At this stage, i am passing PP since 6 months ( in fact, i submitted an
answer about 3 hours after he sent me
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:19:57PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still no news from it :-(
I have put a watch on Rene Engelhard on my ICQ list... When he will be
back online, i will try to get him...
At this stage, i am passing PP since 6
38 matches
Mail list logo
