On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:02:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Anyway, this is certainly no worse than what happened with the maintainer
upload of ulex, which was uploaded before findlib was available on all archs
and had to be given back after a FTBFS.
Well, sorry, but I consider this as a
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 02:31:32AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Dude, I wasn't complaining, I was pointing out that the binNMUs I scheduled
are no different than the maintainer uploads.
Yep, got it, I wasn't bothered at all by your mail (sorry if it seemed
so), I was just wondering if anything
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:13:02AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:02:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Anyway, this is certainly no worse than what happened with the maintainer
upload of ulex, which was uploaded before findlib was available on all archs
and had
lablgtk2-doc_2.4.0v0.2tv-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lablgtk2-doc_2.4.0v0.2tv-8.dsc
lablgtk2-doc_2.4.0v0.2tv-8.diff.gz
liblablgtk2-ocaml-doc_2.4.0v0.2tv-8_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
lablgtk2-doc_2.4.0v0.2tv-8.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/lablgtk2-doc/lablgtk2-doc_2.4.0v0.2tv-8.diff.gz
lablgtk2-doc_2.4.0v0.2tv-8.dsc
to pool/main/l/lablgtk2-doc/lablgtk2-doc_2.4.0v0.2tv-8.dsc
liblablgtk2-ocaml-doc_2.4.0v0.2tv-8_all.deb
to
Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:32:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#441745: fixed in lablgtk2-doc 2.4.0v0.2tv-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
mldonkey_2.9.1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mldonkey_2.9.1-1.dsc
mldonkey_2.9.1.orig.tar.gz
mldonkey_2.9.1-1.diff.gz
mldonkey-server_2.9.1-1_i386.deb
mldonkey-gui_2.9.1-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
Accepted:
mldonkey-gui_2.9.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey-gui_2.9.1-1_i386.deb
mldonkey-server_2.9.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey-server_2.9.1-1_i386.deb
mldonkey_2.9.1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/m/mldonkey/mldonkey_2.9.1-1.diff.gz
mldonkey_2.9.1-1.dsc
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:34:11 +0200
Source: mldonkey
Binary: mldonkey-gui mldonkey-server
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.9.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:35:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I was just wondering if anything can be improved on the handling of
that give backs (on which I'm sure you know more than me). Knowing that
with non timely upload I can induce some troubles to others is not
exactly something
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:42:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:35:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I was just wondering if anything can be improved on the handling of
that give backs (on which I'm sure you know more than me). Knowing that
with non timely
On 12-09-2007, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:47:19PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:42:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:35:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I was just wondering if anything can be
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:47:19PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:42:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:35:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I was just wondering if anything can be improved on the handling of
that give backs (on which
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 04:11:14PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:47:19PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:42:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:35:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I was just wondering if
14 matches
Mail list logo
