FYI: The status of the syslog-ocaml source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.3-6
Current version: 1.4-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
-
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 15:26:28 +0100, Stephane Glondu wrote:
> Note that all architectures are not listed for each package: I took
> archs where at least one binary package exists (or all if one
> arch-independant binary package exists).
>
arch-independant packages are not rebuilt by binary
Hi releasers, below you can find the binNMU requests for the transition
to OCaml 3.10.1. They are intermixed with the needed dep-waits; the
latter are assuming that +b1 is the binNMU obtained fulfilling our
requests.
Can someone please schedule them?
The whole list is also available at
http://pkg
Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
[...] The only "little"
remark i have: can you "sort" the arch for every line. It is better to
have always the same list of arches. It helps to spot the difference.
Done.
Note that all architectures are not listed for each package: I took
archs where at least one bin
On 15-02-2008, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --5vNYLRcllDrimb99
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:41:39PM +0100, St=E9phane Glondu wrote:
>> Ok, I took it into
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:00:15 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: smimram
> Date: Fri Feb 15 09:00:14 2008
> New Revision: 5174
>
> URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ocaml-maint/?sc=1&rev=5174
> Log:
> Add a dependency from ocaml-base to libx11-dev.
>
That's wrong afaict, the dependen
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 13:02:44 +0100, Stephane Glondu wrote:
> BTW, is there a way to get pending binNMUs?
>
Most scheduled binNMUs are listed at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~vorlon/transition-binnmus.txt.
However, now other people are able to schedule them, there's also
http://ftp-master.debia
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:02:44PM +0100, Stephane Glondu wrote:
> Anyway, the build would probably be done with ocaml 3.10.1 (I am
> assuming that packages are always built in unstable), so would
> probably yield the "same" binary package, am I right?
It depends whether the +b1 binNMU has been
Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
The only doubt I've is: you put dep-wait on +b1, in doing so you're
assuming that +b1 is the result of the binNMU *we* are requesting,
right? [...]
Right.
[...] So, in theory, this can screw up if some other binNMU has been
made for other reasons in the involved
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:41:39PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Ok, I took it into account.
Wonderful, thanks.
> The new (and hopefully definitive) request is at:
> http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/binNMU.txt
It looks sane to me.
The only doubt I've is: you put dep-wait on +b1, in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> tags 465764 + pending
Bug#465764: should depend or at least suggest libx11-dev?
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
11 matches
Mail list logo
