Re: omake failures (#510919)

2009-01-07 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 08 January 2009 01:12:28 Mike Furr wrote: > Hi d-o-m, > > Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > Has someone any news from Mike Furr? The last mail from him on a > > Debian mailing-list dates back to Feb. 2008 with a signature > > suggesting that he was lacking time for Debian². Note that the > > M

Re: omake failures (#510919) (and RFS)

2009-01-07 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:05:02 +0100 Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Evgeni Golov a écrit : > > Did you also remove the binary from the .orig.tar.gz? We don't have the > > source for it... > > No, I didn't. Even though the source is not technically available (in > the archive, today), there is an advertis

Re: omake failures (#510919) (and RFS)

2009-01-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Evgeni Golov a écrit : > Did you also remove the binary from the .orig.tar.gz? We don't have the > source for it... No, I didn't. Even though the source is not technically available (in the archive, today), there is an advertised way to rebuild it with only free tools... IMHO, it is not the same i

Re: omake failures (#510919)

2009-01-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Mike Furr wrote: > [things] Obviously, I didn't see this mail when I wrote my previous one (496548fd.2080...@glondu.net). > 1) Remove ocamldep-omake from the package since it is not used by omake > itself. This may impact users who otherwise invoke it themselves (for > historical reasons). This

Re: omake failures (#510919) (and RFS)

2009-01-07 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:29:49 +0100 Stéphane Glondu wrote: > As said in git commit bfd1cebf64a424759df083c1fc15276cc9ea3fff: > > Do not install ocamldep-omake (Closes: #510919) > > > > The build system of omake detects by itself that standard ocamldep > > supports -modules (starting from OCaml 3.1

Re: omake failures (#510919) (and RFS)

2009-01-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
I wrote in <4964c23c.7020...@glondu.net>: >> 1. apply the above mentioned patch against ocamldep as brought with >> ocaml-nox >> package. That would be pretty dangerous, since ocaml-nox rdeps are exposed >> at >> risk. Unlikely to be approved by the release team. > > It seems the patch has alr

Re: omake failures (#510919)

2009-01-07 Thread Mike Furr
Hi d-o-m, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Has someone any news from Mike Furr? The last mail from him on a Debian mailing-list dates back to Feb. 2008 with a signature suggesting that he was lacking time for Debian². Note that the Maintainer field of omake is set to "Mike Furr", and not the mailing-li

Re: omake failures (#510919)

2009-01-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:54:52PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > I intend to have a deeper look at omake by the end of the > week... with at least a migration to git, and switch of Maintainer > to d-o-m (unless otherwise instructed). Seconded. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science

Re: omake failures (#510919)

2009-01-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:35:33PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > For what is important, I totally agree with hijacking the package to > git/d-o-m. I think Mike Furr is MIA for now, just explain that we hijack > the package waiting mfurr to come back. While stating that, it would have been more t

Re: New package libaio-ocaml

2009-01-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:22:50PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Can't something be worked out so there is only one place? Given the > size of this it seems way to much overhead to split it. Yes, it can, but my suggestion to split was based on the fact that both places are not suitable per

Re: New package libaio-ocaml

2009-01-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Stefano Zacchiroli writes: > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:18:25PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> I'm writing ocaml bindings for libaio and am wondering if anyone is >> interested in looking them over and eventually sponsoring them. The > > I'll be happy to sponsor the upload. > > Still, thi

Re: omake failures (#510919)

2009-01-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Sylvain Le Gall writes: > On 07-01-2009, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >>> 4. completely remove that broken package from the archive, no build-repends >>> are found, no harm done. This is my favourity one. >> >> Has someone any news from Mike Furr? The last mail from him on a Debian >> mailing-list d

Re: omake failures (#510919)

2009-01-07 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
On 07-01-2009, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> 4. completely remove that broken package from the archive, no build-repends >> are found, no harm done. This is my favourity one. > > Has someone any news from Mike Furr? The last mail from him on a Debian > mailing-list dates back to Feb. 2008 with a sign

Re: omake failures (#510919)

2009-01-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
George Danchev a écrit : > 1. apply the above mentioned patch against ocamldep as brought with ocaml-nox > package. That would be pretty dangerous, since ocaml-nox rdeps are exposed at > risk. Unlikely to be approved by the release team. It seems the patch has already been applied upstream, sinc

A MAIOR E MELHOR REDE PRIVADA DE WEBSITES DE VÍ DEOS E IMAGENS EM PORTUGUÊS

2009-01-07 Thread PORTUGALNAWEB.COM
A MAIOR E MELHOR REDE PRIVADA DE WEBSITES DE VÍDEOS E IMAGENS EM PORTUGUÊS WWW.VIDEO-DIVERTIDO.COM - O Maior Portal Português De Vídeos De Humor. WWW.ACELERAS.NET - O Portal Em Português Para Todos Os Amantes Do Mundo Automóvel. WWW.VIDEOS-FUTEBOL.COM - Videos-Futebol.com: os melhores momento