Jonathan Ludlam writes:
> Long term, I believe ours should be dropped - I don't think it provides
> anything in any way better than libuuid, and therefore uuidm. It's in at the
> moment because our main code-base depends upon it, and changing it all over
> would be a reasonably large effort. I
Package: libexpat-ocaml-dev
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
In DDTSS I see:
This package contains the developpment part
^
_|
I think it must be:
This package contains the development part
Ciao
Davide
--
Dizionari: http://ling
retitle 450876 O: ara -- utility for searching the Debian package database
thanks
I'm hereby orphaning ara, due to lack of time and limited usage of it on my
side. The package description is:
Command line utility for searching the Debian package database
ara is a utility for searching the Debi
Long term, I believe ours should be dropped - I don't think it provides
anything in any way better than libuuid, and therefore uuidm. It's in at the
moment because our main code-base depends upon it, and changing it all over
would be a reasonably large effort. It's one of the reasons we're putti
On 12/09/2011 08:42 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> There already are ocaml bindings for libuuid1:
> [...]
> Package: libuuidm-ocaml-dev
These are not bindings.
> Not knowing your source does your uuid do something different, something
> more? Could they be merged?
Same question here.
Cheers
5 matches
Mail list logo