Re: New ocaml packages

2011-12-09 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jonathan Ludlam writes: > Long term, I believe ours should be dropped - I don't think it provides > anything in any way better than libuuid, and therefore uuidm. It's in at the > moment because our main code-base depends upon it, and changing it all over > would be a reasonably large effort. I

Bug#651553: libexpat-ocaml-dev: typo in package description

2011-12-09 Thread Davide Prina
Package: libexpat-ocaml-dev Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, In DDTSS I see: This package contains the developpment part ^ _| I think it must be: This package contains the development part Ciao Davide -- Dizionari: http://ling

Orphaning ara

2011-12-09 Thread George Danchev
retitle 450876 O: ara -- utility for searching the Debian package database thanks I'm hereby orphaning ara, due to lack of time and limited usage of it on my side. The package description is: Command line utility for searching the Debian package database ara is a utility for searching the Debi

Re: New ocaml packages

2011-12-09 Thread Jonathan Ludlam
Long term, I believe ours should be dropped - I don't think it provides anything in any way better than libuuid, and therefore uuidm. It's in at the moment because our main code-base depends upon it, and changing it all over would be a reasonably large effort. It's one of the reasons we're putti

Re: New ocaml packages

2011-12-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
On 12/09/2011 08:42 AM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > There already are ocaml bindings for libuuid1: > [...] > Package: libuuidm-ocaml-dev These are not bindings. > Not knowing your source does your uuid do something different, something > more? Could they be merged? Same question here. Cheers