Bug#795443: ocaml: please make the ocamldoc date configurable

Source: ocaml Version: 4.01.0-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: toolchain X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that ocamldoc always generates

Bug#791052: transition: gmetadom (libgdome2-cpp-smart0v5)

retitle 791052 transition: gmetadom (libgdome2-cpp-smart0v5) reassign 791052 release.debian.org severity 791052 normal user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 791052 + transition block 791052 by 790756 forwarded 791052 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gmetadom.html thank

Processed: Re: Bug#791052: transition: gmetadom (libgdome2-cpp-smart0v5)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 791052 transition: gmetadom (libgdome2-cpp-smart0v5) Bug #791052 [src:gmetadom] gmetadom: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default Changed Bug title to 'transition: gmetadom (libgdome2-cpp-smart0v5)' from 'gmetadom: lib

ocaml_4.02.3-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 18:53:50 +0200 Source: ocaml Binary: ocaml-nox ocaml ocaml-base-nox ocaml-base ocaml-native-compilers ocaml-source ocaml-interp ocaml-compiler-libs ocaml-mode Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 4.

Processing of ocaml_4.02.3-1_amd64.changes

ocaml_4.02.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ocaml_4.02.3-1.dsc ocaml_4.02.3.orig.tar.xz ocaml_4.02.3-1.debian.tar.xz ocaml-base-nox_4.02.3-1_amd64.deb ocaml-base_4.02.3-1_amd64.deb ocaml-compiler-libs_4.02.3-1_amd64.deb ocaml-interp_4.02.3-1_a

Bug#779086: marked as done (ocaml: please make the build reproducible)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:51:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#779086: fixed in ocaml 4.02.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #779086, regarding ocaml: please make the build reproducible to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#461125: marked as done (ocaml-nox: linking into a shared library fails due to R_X86_64_32 relocations)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:51:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#461125: fixed in ocaml 4.02.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #461125, regarding ocaml-nox: linking into a shared library fails due to R_X86_64_32 relocations to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#794586: marked as done (ocaml: Please make ocamldoc produce reproducible manpages)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 17:51:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#794586: fixed in ocaml 4.02.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #794586, regarding ocaml: Please make ocamldoc produce reproducible manpages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#794586: ocaml: Please make ocamldoc produce reproducible manpages

Control: tags -1 + pending Le 04/08/2015 19:10, Valentin Lorentz a écrit : > The attached patch removes extra timestamps from the generated > documentation. Once applied, ocamldoc-generated manpages can be built > reproducibly in our current experimental framework. With your patch, ocaml FTBFS wh

Processed: Re: Bug#794586: ocaml: Please make ocamldoc produce reproducible manpages

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #794586 [src:ocaml] ocaml: Please make ocamldoc produce reproducible manpages Added tag(s) pending. -- 794586: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794586 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#795366: mldonkey: [INTL:pt_BR] Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation

Package: mldonkey Tags: l10n patch Severity: wishlist Hello, Please, Could you update the Brazilian Portuguese Translation? Attached you will find the file pt_BR.po. It is UTF-8 encoded and it is tested with msgfmt and podebconf-display-po. Kind regards, Eder L. Marques pt_BR.po.gz Descriptio

Bug#627132: marked as done (New "-custom" binary generation breaks stack backtraces)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 11:45:16 +0200 with message-id <55cc672c.4020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#627132: New "-custom" binary generation breaks stack backtraces has caused the Debian Bug report #627132, regarding New "-custom" binary generation breaks stack backtraces to b

Processed: Re: Bug#461125: ocaml-nox: linking into a shared library fails due to R_X86_64_32 relocations

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + fixed-upstream pending Bug #461125 [ocaml-nox] ocaml-nox: linking into a shared library fails due to R_X86_64_32 relocations Added tag(s) pending and fixed-upstream. -- 461125: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=461125 Debian Bug Tracking S

Bug#461125: ocaml-nox: linking into a shared library fails due to R_X86_64_32 relocations

Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream pending Le 16/01/2008 19:53, Mathijs Romans a écrit : > I'm not sure I understand the problem exactly, I'm sorry for that. I run on > AMD64 and I'm > making a shared library using the library libasmrun.a. However the linker > complains that a > relocation R_X8

Bug#588978: marked as done (ocaml-nox: ocamlbuild cannot handle symlink loops)

Your message dated Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:59:30 +0200 with message-id <55cc5c72.5040...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#588978: cannot reproduce with 3.11.2-2 or 3.12.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #588978, regarding ocaml-nox: ocamlbuild cannot handle symlink loops to be marked as done. Thi