Long term, I believe ours should be dropped - I don't think it provides
anything in any way better than libuuid, and therefore uuidm. It's in at the
moment because our main code-base depends upon it, and changing it all over
would be a reasonably large effort. It's one of the reasons we're putti
Dear Debian OCaml Task Force,
A team of us here at Citrix are working on porting the XCP Xen toolstack to
Debian, a large majority of which is written in OCaml. As part of this effort,
we needed to get the OCaml bindings to the Xen control libraries sorted, which
a number of you helped with and
On 25 Nov 2011, at 17:14, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 04:52:48PM +0000, Jonathan Ludlam wrote:
>> On 25 Nov 2011, at 16:17, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:28:35PM +, Jon Ludlam wrote:
>>>> +Depends: ocaml-base-nox-${F
On 25 Nov 2011, at 16:49, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> On 11/25/2011 05:17 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> +Depends: ocaml-base-nox-${F:OCamlABI}
>>
>> Why is this not generated?
>
> It should be.
>
Ah, is the policy doc out of date, or am I confused? (I know it's out of date
in a few respects, not
On 25 Nov 2011, at 16:17, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 04:28:35PM +, Jon Ludlam wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/debian/bin/gencontrol.py b/xen/debian/bin/gencontrol.py
>> index f2b7424..2bdf5fb 100755
>> --- a/xen/debian/bin/gencontrol.py
>> +++ b/xen/debian/bin/gencontrol.py
>>
On 18 Nov 2011, at 11:59, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 12:04 +, Jon Ludlam wrote:
>> This is is an update of patch 6 sent yesterday. Changes are:
>>
>> * The packages it creates are now named libxen-4.1-ocaml and
>> libxen-4.1-ocaml-dev as per Stéphane's suggestion. The
>>
Ah, it's expecting suffixes of ocaml and ocaml-dev is it? I'll fix that. Thanks!
Jon
On 15 Nov 2011, at 16:21, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 04:04 PM, Jon Ludlam wrote:
>> +Package: libxen-ocaml-@version@
>> +Architecture: any
>> +Section: libs
>> +Depends: ocaml-base-nox-${F:OCamlABI},
7 matches
Mail list logo
