Package: mlpcap
Followup-For: Bug #1066654
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
Control: tags -1 patch
Please find attached a patch for this issue that has been uploaded to
Ubuntu.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
for the why3+cvc4 test
cannot be satisfied. The attached patch makes the test dependency
architecture-specific and lets it pass as a no-op on architectures without
cvc4.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
, and as seen
at http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/w/why3 the tests are now passing
for 0.88.3 on all architectures where they previously passed.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 12:56:13PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> On 01/08/2017 02:00, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I believe the provided patch is inaccurate because it doesn't handle the
> > case of a given package name appearing at the very beginning or the very end
> > o
list, or one of the characters [,(:]
The three possible terminating characters are for: a bare dependency
followed by another ("libevent-0.2-5, [...]"); a versioned dependency
("libevent-0.2-5 (>= [...])"; and a multiarch dependency
("libevent-0.2-5:any").
--
Stev
Adam Barratt pointed out to me on IRC that I overlooked a runtime dependency
on libppl0.10-dev from the -dev package; have corrected this now and am
uploading a second NMU with the attached patch. Sorry for the churn.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
for which you can find attached. Hopefully
this NMU is appreciated, or at least zeroes out my karma wrt the package
removal from testing. Please holler if there are any problems with this
change.
The NMU will be uploaded to unstable shortly.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me
altogether.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:13:00PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 23/03/2011 21:02, Steve Langasek a écrit :
[...] But it does fix the
problem, though it can't really be applied to ocaml until dpkg 1.16.0 is
uploaded to Debian.
Does it really matter that /usr/lib/`dpkg-architecture
random.ml, line 1, characters 0-1:
Error: Assembler error, input left in file /tmp/camlasm0c9c8e.s
make[3]: *** [random.cmx] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/vorlon/multiarch/ocaml-3.11.2/stdlib'
I'll dig into it and let you know if I find out otherwise...
--
Steve Langasek
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 09:14:17PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 13:02:06 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
After applying this patch, I unfortunately still get a build failure in
natty, but this appears to be unrelated to multiarch so may be
Ubuntu-specific:
../boot
, or
to replace it with python-dev? A build-dep on python2.6-dev definitely
looks wrong to me.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp
you can find the full report:
http://uvw.ru/report.lenny.txt
Oh; there's the problem, I can't read my font and the package name is
liguidsoap - not liquidsoap.
Resetting severity back to 'grave', pending further analysis.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
severity 496360 normal
tags 496360 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Your bug report contains *no* information about the liquidsoap package.
Where is the vulnerability?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
for ocaml. Has this not made it to the implementation stages yet?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL
someone please schedule them?
BinNMUs scheduled, however a number of these packages appear to be arch: all
bytecode and therefore cannot be binNMUed:
headache, ocamlwc, planets, polygen, ledit, cmigrep
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:13:02AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 02:02:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Anyway, this is certainly no worse than what happened with the maintainer
upload of ulex, which was uploaded before findlib was available on all archs
and had
think we have any kind of hard numbers on new problems this might introduce
(unnecessary transition delays, etc).
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:47:19PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:42:55AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:35:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I was just wondering if anything can be improved on the handling of
that give backs (on which
of these packages aren't binNMU-safe, but every
one of the packages is in need of a rebuild for ocaml 3.10.
Yes, there will be some packages that won't be buildable yet, but that will
be addressed in due course. As for ocamldap and ocamlnet, you seem to have
the dependency backwards...
--
Steve
was available on all archs
and had to be given back after a FTBFS.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
though).
Scheduled. FWIW, the package names wanted here are the source package
names, not the binary package names.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
is RC.
Agreed, the release policy is clarified now.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
is unequivocally the right thing under the FHS, but splitting
this fine of a hair is not RC.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
if these commands are supposed to be
exported as part of hevea as they were before, but I'm marking this bug as
blocked by 397332 on the assumption that they are.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:26:18AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:21:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It looks like we'll have a new ocaml transition soon.
Have discussed this a bit with Sven on IRC already. The two main
considerations are: 1) please wait
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 08:28:09AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:21:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
2) please try to check whether this new upstream version includes any
regressions in the set of architectures supported for native compiling. The
latter has
from it, and i think it is
impportant they know about this new development. I will inform Steve
Langasek
on irc.
Have discussed this a bit with Sven on IRC already. The two main
considerations are: 1) please wait for the python 2.4 transition to complete
first, 2) please try to check whether
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:01:54AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:16:28PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Anyway, the script I'm using for this is smart enough that it won't pick up
any false-positives for packages you've already uploaded, because it knows
not to try
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:31:14AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:13:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:01:54AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 06:16:28PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Anyway, the script I'm using
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 11:20:22AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:43:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:05:48AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
any dependencies other than ocaml-nox-3.09.1, ocaml-base-3.09.1, and
ocaml-base-nox-3.09.1
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:45:53PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 04:43:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Are there any packages which depend on ocaml-base-nox-3.09.1,
ocaml-base-3.09.1, or ocaml-nox-3.09.1 that are not in this list?
Yes, but (assuming Julien's
any
non-binNMUable ones. So if you could answer the above questions, I should
be able to get these binNMUs going pretty quickly.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:43:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:21:49PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 01:17:04PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
A new version of ocaml (3.09.2) is available. Since the caml libraries
are binary-incompatible
, but better safe than sorry.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:26:35PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
approx still depends on ocaml-base-nox-3.09.0 on hppa, m68k, mips,
mipsel, s390. Could you trigger a binNMU on these architectures for the
transition to 3.09.1?
Queued.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me
make sure they are
installed *before* the .cmi files so that the .cmi's aren't treated as out
of date by make.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
) instead, under the revised policy
for ocaml packages.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 12:39:31PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:32:40AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
- a handful of packages that still build-depend on ocaml-3.08.3 or similar,
and require sourceful uploads for the ocaml transition. These packages
are advi
, and possibly #2 as well?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 07:17:25PM +1100, skaller wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 23:43 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Ok, here's a bit more information. Sorry for not posting to the bug
earlier.
[]
Dang, that's some pretty fine work for someone that claims
'I don't speak ocaml' :)
Ah
severity 338148 important
tags 338437 patch
thanks
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 10:51:48PM -0500, Mike Furr wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Rather, the segfault happens in camlPrintf__entry, which is called
from caml_startup__code_begin. I can't find a definition for
camlPrintf__entry anywhere
-dep on a real package when possible.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 05:43:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 01:51:23AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:15:30AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[ Mail-Followup-To: set to debian-mentors only ]
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:57:25AM +0200
, approved.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, assuming you are on -ocaml-maint, since that's what you set your M-F-T
to...
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in place, it just won't do much until all the packages
are ready.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
. It seems to have been accepted as such by katie, but should not
have been; and is now being rejected by britney. You'll have to do a full
sourceful upload to fix this.
See the developer's reference for proper binary-only NMU versioning.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
actually say what it is you think we should
be aware of. Your message seems to be unspecified problems with
hppa/ia64 plus willy hates me so we're doomed.
The fact that Matthew Willcox is among the maintainers of those
buildds
No, he isn't.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
is not supported, but the fact that there are old ara binaries
on these architectures is something that must be resolved before the new
version of the package can progress to testing.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:12:54AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 10:55:34PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 06:20:19PM +0100, Berke Durak wrote:
The Ocaml native compiler is not available under some architectures
(e.g., MIPS, ARM...). The native
reopen 269536
thanks
The new version of advi is again FTBFS on alpha and mipsel; this bug
doesn't appear to be fixed.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
on these mailing
lists.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on these mailing
lists.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpqgnkUV2rDc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, only
to leave ourselves unable to distribute part of our own 'approved'
archive, is no win. :)
But I definitely agree with you that some action needs to be taken on
the documentation-as-software question.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
a license, only
to leave ourselves unable to distribute part of our own 'approved'
archive, is no win. :)
But I definitely agree with you that some action needs to be taken on
the documentation-as-software question.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
56 matches
Mail list logo
