On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 04:59:51PM -0800, David FOx wrote:
> We have done several projects here using ocaml, because me and two other
> senior engineers here have a long history with functional programming
> languages. I wrote the back end of the Click-n-Run software warehouse
> in ocaml. This
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 09:42:45AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> We need a policy update about this. Is the new XML policy already ok to
> look into ?
>
... still being written. But you can edit it, i split the main document
in several part.
Forgot to say : new packaging policy stand with
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:38:07AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:29:19AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Ok, thanks.
> > > BTW, i will be in Paris thursday and friday next week, so maybe we could
> > > meet or something on thursday evening.
> > Yes, sure. I'm in fa
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:00:35PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:56:41PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Shall we decide on where we're going to meet?
> > > I proposed:
> > > - La Taverne des H
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:45:09PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > In English, Sven won't be able to come tomorrow, but he'll be there
> > > next Thursday.
> > > Shall w
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:40:42PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:17:30PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sven, do you confirm you'll be in Paris tomorrow?
> >
> > Yep.
> >
> > > If so, we can meet
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:35:02PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a meeting at 18:00 at Plessis Robinson ( for my future work ). I
> > don't know how long it will last, but i'll be there 30 min after the end
> > of this. ( So don't
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 07:24:26PM +0100, Serge Leblanc wrote:
> Is the problem of licence of the library BigNum solved?
>
Hello,
In fact, i think that the problem has been solved... If there is really
a problem :
- nobody seems to remember to whom belongs the licence
- the part has been remove
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:08:39AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:01:45AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: ocaml-headache
> > Version : 1.02
> > Upstream Author : Vincent Simonet
> > * URL
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:55:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:46:00PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Can you create an empty directory "debmirror" and give write access to
> > > goswin-guest
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:40:23AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:46:00PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > > Can you create an empty dir
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 08:18:54PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just packaged and released perl4caml 0.3.7 to Incoming. It
> should appear in sid after the usual delay.
>
> It is split into three packages: the shared library, the development
> files, and the documentat
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:54:24AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:00:41AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 08:18:54PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have just packaged and released perl4caml 0.3.7 to Inc
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:44:07PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I actually maintain it, and many of my other packages, with tla/Arch. It's
> > > in my personal repository over at arch.debian.org. Thanks for the
> > >
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 07:22:02AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:26:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:44:07PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:28:19PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:26:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Well, i think you know my point of view... I think it is better to have
> > a main repository for all debian ocaml packages :
> > - if a problem arise in on
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 08:40:47AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 08:03:42AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Well, since i have sleep i have some more arguments pro central repo for
> > ocaml :
> > - maintaining package is more a "transverse" work, ie : when you package
> >
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:21:31PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:06:48PM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
> > It is time to update also the ocaml-libs package dependencies, isn't it?
>
> Yes, it is. Last update was before ocaml 3.07 :-(
>
> I've no time to mai
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 07:54:04AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 12:00:45AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:43:52PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > > Sylvain,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:23:40PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> >
Hello,
Well, since last week, i wait for svn.debian.org to be back online, to
ask the sponsoring of different package, i have made.
After time, ( and a pression of some user ) i decide not to commit and
do a release anyway, using my simple ftp archive.
So, is there some of you who can do an uplo
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:38:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:55:02PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:29:35PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > I think we should better have a naming convention for camlp4 syntax
> > > estension instea
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:47:26PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:50:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ps : yeah, yeah i know, why do i have moved policy to dh-make-ocaml...
> > Just revert it to pkg-ocaml-maint/projects/policy/trunk if you want, i
> > have not
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:20:28PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Is anyone packaging OUnit?
>
> http://home.wanadoo.nl/maas/ocaml/
>
> If not, I think I will.
>
Hello,
I have plan to do it, but i haven't start... Just go ahead if you need
it immediatly.
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
--
To UNS
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 08:34:24AM +0900, Yamagata Yoriyuki wrote:
> From: "Sylvain LE GALL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: RFS: headache, ocamlgsl, ocamlgraph, ocamldap, cameleon, camomile
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:52:35 +0100
>
> > By the way : i remove UnicodeData.txt from the so
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 09:02:38AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> The top of the recent chaneglog entry of mldonkey :
>
> mldonkey (2.5.16-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Forget to close old bugs ( see 2.5.11-1 )
> ( Closes: #225254, #210174, #229360, #226484, #229862 )
> ( Closes: #217534
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:07:41PM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 09:02:38AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> >> The top of the recent chaneglog entry of mldonkey :
> >>
> >> mldonkey (2.5.16-2) unstable; urgency=low
> >>
> >> * Forget to clo
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:08:47AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> What's the story with the ocamlgsl package that's in svn?
> Sylvain, it looks like you started to package it a couple of months ago
> and it never made it into the archive... Are there any problems with
> the package? Do you jus
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:15:28PM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > ... Hummm... You think it "doesn't look quite finished", could you give
> > me more detail ? I will fix whatever you want to upload it ( i made a
> > promise to upstream about this, in
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:10:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Sylvain LE GALL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:07:05AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Sylvain LE GALL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Format: 1.7
> >> > Date: Thu, 8 A
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 02:55:03PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:33:59AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > - ocamlgraph
>
> I've looked at ocamlgraph and the package is ok.
>
> Thus I decided to sponsor it and ... I'm uploading it right now.
>
First of al
Hello all,
I have a talked with Robert McQueen the actual maintainer of Unison.
He want to orphan it sooner or later.
Since it is ocaml stuff, i proposed him to adopt it in the name of
Debian Ocaml Maintainer.
This package is a bit complicated though :
- all version A and version A+1 seems to
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:26:55PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:03:49AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I think it would be wise for someone more knowledgable than I on issues
> > of OCaml distribution to participate with the GODI group to make it
> > nicely interope
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:43:12AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:01:26AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have another question :
> > Should it be possible to have GODI packaged ?
>
> IMO it should be. But it should be not only "trivially" packages it
> should
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:57:01AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:35:28AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > The RFS for ocamlgraph fixes a RC bugs, and i really would like to see
> > ocamlgraph enter sarge...
>
> I've just uploaded ocamlgraph 0.70-3.
>
> Cheers.
>
Hello,
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:31:54PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> per ocamlgsl,
>
> There's no reason to take sparc and hppa out of the arch list. The
> only problem is in the way ocamlgsl is using ocaml's foreign function
> interface(Double_val is actually a function, not a macro on these
> a
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:43:10PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 09:41:44PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > Now, why should I need all that just to compile hello world?
>
> The ocaml-base packages depends on tcl, tk, and xlibs. Have we
> considered splitting the ocaml pack
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 10:00:19AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been playing around with the ocaml package trying to produce a
> patch for splitting it up. We have had several requests for this and
> there seemed to be a consesus that each was a good idea, but I wanted t
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:52:07AM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:45:23AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have already reply... But i miss the keycap and hit "r" in place of
> > "L"...
> >
> > I propose Mr Jones to sponsor me for camomile upload...
> >
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 03:42:01PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Altough it is still unanounced, lablgtk upstream has released lablgtk
> 2.4.0. I don't know what that means with regard to lablgtk1
> compatibility, but i will probably have the lablgtk package be this new
> lablgtk2 descen
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:08:44PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 07:55:24PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > ocamlgraph
> > I've already sponsored this package in the past, I will forward port it
> > to 3.08 and upload it (if Sylvain doesn't mind of course).
>
>
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 01:35:10PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 10:38, John Goerzen wrote:
> > If you can come up with a list of the remaining problematic packages,
> > that would be great.
> $ grep-dctrl -n -s Package ocaml-3.07 Sources
> ara
> cameleon [discussed re
Hello,
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:53:40PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:40:29PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:38:58PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Any reason why not to drop the old cache paych in favor of the new
> > > one?
> >
> > W
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:58:43AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 08:14:14PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> >
> > Severity: Serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Package: libcamlimages-ocaml
> >
> > As of version 2.12-2, package libcamlimages-ocaml has not yet been
> > rebuilt
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:25:28AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:27:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > ocamlgraph builds nicely also inside the pbuilder environment. Sylvain,
> > > may I sponsor it?
> > Yes, please go ahead.
>
> Ok, in case there are problems we c
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:32:35AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:36:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 01:17:54AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > > - ocamldap : new upstream release + migration to ocaml 3.08.
> > >
> > > - camlidl : new upstream r
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 09:32:11AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As you can see on :
>
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=ocaml
>
> Ocaml makes 54 packages in testing uninstallable :
>
> ara, camlidl, fort, libagrep-ocaml-dev, libcalendar-ocaml-dev,
> libcr
Hello,
Since my usual sponsor is in holiday, i come to ask you for an upload.
As i have told the #debian-ocaml-maint last time, i have packaged the
latest version of mldonkey ( 2.5.27 ). I commited it in the svn last
night.
Thank you in advance for the upload
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
--
To
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 06:19:04AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 01:43:04AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I know i am after the ocaml mini freeze but i come to pray some of you
> > to upload mldonkey ( last one, i promise ).
>
> Mmm. Technically, w
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 10:38:18AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Sven,
>
> Please act as a responsible person and stop uploading new packages
> into the archive. Those packages can wait for sarge+1, you know this.
>
> Sarge is scheduled for september and adding new packages, just like
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:23:19PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:25:50AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 04:15:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Comments?
> >
> > What about packages other then mine in the above list? Do they really
>
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 04:59:51PM -0800, David FOx wrote:
> We have done several projects here using ocaml, because me and two other
> senior engineers here have a long history with functional programming
> languages. I wrote the back end of the Click-n-Run software warehouse
> in ocaml. This
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 09:42:45AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> We need a policy update about this. Is the new XML policy already ok to
> look into ?
>
... still being written. But you can edit it, i split the main document
in several part.
Forgot to say : new packaging policy stand with
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:38:07AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:29:19AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Ok, thanks.
> > > BTW, i will be in Paris thursday and friday next week, so maybe we could
> > > meet or something on thursday evening.
> > Yes, sure. I'm in fa
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 07:41:30PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:00:35PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:56:41PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Shall we decide on where we're going to meet?
> > > I proposed:
> > > - La Taverne des H
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:45:09PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > In English, Sven won't be able to come tomorrow, but he'll be there
> > > next Thursday.
> > > Shall w
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:40:42PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 03:17:30PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sven, do you confirm you'll be in Paris tomorrow?
> >
> > Yep.
> >
> > > If so, we can meet
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:35:02PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a meeting at 18:00 at Plessis Robinson ( for my future work ). I
> > don't know how long it will last, but i'll be there 30 min after the end
> > of this. ( So don't
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 07:24:26PM +0100, Serge Leblanc wrote:
> Is the problem of licence of the library BigNum solved?
>
Hello,
In fact, i think that the problem has been solved... If there is really
a problem :
- nobody seems to remember to whom belongs the licence
- the part has been remove
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:08:39AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:01:45AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: ocaml-headache
> > Version : 1.02
> > Upstream Author : Vincent Simonet
> > * URL
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 07:55:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:46:00PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Can you create an empty directory "debmirror" and give write access to
> > > goswin-guest
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:40:23AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:46:00PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > > Can you create an empty dir
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 08:18:54PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just packaged and released perl4caml 0.3.7 to Incoming. It
> should appear in sid after the usual delay.
>
> It is split into three packages: the shared library, the development
> files, and the documentat
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:54:24AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:00:41AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 08:18:54PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have just packaged and released perl4caml 0.3.7 to Inc
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:44:07PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > I actually maintain it, and many of my other packages, with tla/Arch.
> > > It's
> > > in my personal repository over at arch.debian.org. Thanks for th
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 07:22:02AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:26:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:44:07PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:28:19PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:26:06AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Well, i think you know my point of view... I think it is better to have
> > a main repository for all debian ocaml packages :
> > - if a problem arise in on
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 08:40:47AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 08:03:42AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Well, since i have sleep i have some more arguments pro central repo for
> > ocaml :
> > - maintaining package is more a "transverse" work, ie : when you package
> >
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:21:31PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:06:48PM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
> > It is time to update also the ocaml-libs package dependencies, isn't it?
>
> Yes, it is. Last update was before ocaml 3.07 :-(
>
> I've no time to mai
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 07:54:04AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 12:00:45AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:43:52PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > > Sylvain,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:23:40PM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> >
Hello,
Well, since last week, i wait for svn.debian.org to be back online, to
ask the sponsoring of different package, i have made.
After time, ( and a pression of some user ) i decide not to commit and
do a release anyway, using my simple ftp archive.
So, is there some of you who can do an uplo
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:38:04PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:55:02PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:29:35PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > I think we should better have a naming convention for camlp4 syntax
> > > estension instea
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:47:26PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:50:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ps : yeah, yeah i know, why do i have moved policy to dh-make-ocaml...
> > Just revert it to pkg-ocaml-maint/projects/policy/trunk if you want, i
> > have not
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:20:28PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Is anyone packaging OUnit?
>
> http://home.wanadoo.nl/maas/ocaml/
>
> If not, I think I will.
>
Hello,
I have plan to do it, but i haven't start... Just go ahead if you need
it immediatly.
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 08:34:24AM +0900, Yamagata Yoriyuki wrote:
> From: "Sylvain LE GALL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: RFS: headache, ocamlgsl, ocamlgraph, ocamldap, cameleon, camomile
> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:52:35 +0100
>
> > By the way : i remove UnicodeData.txt from the so
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 09:02:38AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> The top of the recent chaneglog entry of mldonkey :
>
> mldonkey (2.5.16-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Forget to close old bugs ( see 2.5.11-1 )
> ( Closes: #225254, #210174, #229360, #226484, #229862 )
> ( Closes: #217534
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:07:41PM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 09:02:38AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> >> The top of the recent chaneglog entry of mldonkey :
> >>
> >> mldonkey (2.5.16-2) unstable; urgency=low
> >>
> >> * Forget to clo
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:08:47AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> What's the story with the ocamlgsl package that's in svn?
> Sylvain, it looks like you started to package it a couple of months ago
> and it never made it into the archive... Are there any problems with
> the package? Do you jus
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:15:28PM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > ... Hummm... You think it "doesn't look quite finished", could you give
> > me more detail ? I will fix whatever you want to upload it ( i made a
> > promise to upstream about this, in
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:10:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Sylvain LE GALL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 12:07:05AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Sylvain LE GALL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > Format: 1.7
> >> > Date: Thu, 8 A
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 02:55:03PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:33:59AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > - ocamlgraph
>
> I've looked at ocamlgraph and the package is ok.
>
> Thus I decided to sponsor it and ... I'm uploading it right now.
>
First of al
Hello all,
I have a talked with Robert McQueen the actual maintainer of Unison.
He want to orphan it sooner or later.
Since it is ocaml stuff, i proposed him to adopt it in the name of
Debian Ocaml Maintainer.
This package is a bit complicated though :
- all version A and version A+1 seems to
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:26:55PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:03:49AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I think it would be wise for someone more knowledgable than I on issues
> > of OCaml distribution to participate with the GODI group to make it
> > nicely interope
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:43:12AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:01:26AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have another question :
> > Should it be possible to have GODI packaged ?
>
> IMO it should be. But it should be not only "trivially" packages it
> should
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 01:57:01AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:35:28AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > The RFS for ocamlgraph fixes a RC bugs, and i really would like to see
> > ocamlgraph enter sarge...
>
> I've just uploaded ocamlgraph 0.70-3.
>
> Cheers.
>
Hello,
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:31:54PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> per ocamlgsl,
>
> There's no reason to take sparc and hppa out of the arch list. The
> only problem is in the way ocamlgsl is using ocaml's foreign function
> interface(Double_val is actually a function, not a macro on these
> a
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:43:10PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 09:41:44PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > Now, why should I need all that just to compile hello world?
>
> The ocaml-base packages depends on tcl, tk, and xlibs. Have we
> considered splitting the ocaml pack
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 10:00:19AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been playing around with the ocaml package trying to produce a
> patch for splitting it up. We have had several requests for this and
> there seemed to be a consesus that each was a good idea, but I wanted t
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 09:52:07AM +0100, Richard Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:45:23AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have already reply... But i miss the keycap and hit "r" in place of
> > "L"...
> >
> > I propose Mr Jones to sponsor me for camomile upload...
> >
88 matches
Mail list logo
