Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hello,
With approval of its maintainer, and for the reasons explained in [1],
I request the removal of matita from testing.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612891
Cheers,
Le 14/02/2011 13:04, ygrek a écrit :
Freshly installed ocsigen silenty fails to start:
$ sudo aptitude install ocsigen
[...]
$ sudo invoke-rc.d ocsigen force-start
Starting ocsigen: ocsigen.
$ ps faux | grep ocs | grep -v grep
$ sudo tail /var/log/ocsigen/errors.log
2011-02-14 13:06:40 - Fatal -
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Owner: glo...@debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I've prepared a small transition of some libs to new upstream
versions, to be completed before the transition to OCaml >= 3.12 (not
yet planned). I've doc
Le 10/02/2011 10:12, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
> I also have a pair of packages to update (sexplib, type-conv, bin-prot,
> ounit). Since some of them will break the distribution and should
> trigger the need to binNMU some other packages, I am not sure how to
> proceed: 1) upload new version during
Le 19/02/2011 18:08, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> This is an automatic email to change the status of glmlite back from ITP
> (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
> any activity during the last 6 months.
I've started to package glmlite, and the basic packagin
-By: Stéphane Glondu
Description:
coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler)
coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories)
coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface)
libcoq-ocaml-dev - development libraries and tools
Package: tuareg-mode
Version: 1:2.0.4-3
Severity: important
Hello,
1. run emacs without ~/.emacs file
2. open any .ml file
3. M-x camldebug
fails with the following error:
> execute-extended-command: Symbol's value as variable is void: caml-mode-map
even though the status bar indicates that
Le 22/02/2011 07:47, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: cmigrep
> Version: 1.5-7
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110221 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
A fix of that is scheduled to be uploaded during the OCaml 3.12.0
transi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
Here is a binNMU request for packages that are broken by the
(mini-)transition tracked with #613848. I've simulated it on amd64,
and everything compiles [1] except ocaml-melt which se
Le 26/02/2011 01:38, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> Package: libsoundtouch-dev
> Version: 1.5.0-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: i said so
>
> Apparently you decided to start a SONAME transition with no coordination
> with the release team. This will clash with the ongoing transition to
> ffmpe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stéphane Glondu"
* Package name: ocaml-cil
Version : 1.3.7
Upstream Author : George C. Necula and others
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/cil/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description
Maintainers
Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu
Description:
coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler)
coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories)
coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface)
libcoq-ocaml - runtime libraries for
Le 27/02/2011 01:42, Florent Monnier a écrit :
> It's true that some examples are made to work in the source tree, but I made
> patches for this in the mandriva package and I have given yet the link for
> this : http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2010/03/msg00013.html
> http://svn.mandriv
Le 16/02/2011 20:32, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
> [...]
> + * Use dh-ocaml for ocaml dependencies, bump version of dh-ocaml and
> ocaml-nox
> +accordingly.
> [...]
> Package: cmigrep
> Architecture: all
> -Depends: ocaml-base-nox-${F:OCamlABI}, libpcre-ocaml, ${misc:Depends}
> +Depends: ${ocaml
Le 03/03/2011 05:37, Eric Cooper a écrit :
> What's the status of packaging ocamlnet3? If someone has already
> started, please let me know if there's anything I can do to help.
I am not aware of that. It was on my TODO-list, but after OCaml 3.12.0,
Lwt 2.2.1, Ocsigen 1.3.4 (which are basically r
Le 05/03/2011 22:49, Eric Cooper a écrit :
> What's the best way to cherry-pick the fixes from SVN? I'd like to
> add them to debian/patches (preferably automatically), so that they
> can be easily dropped when Gerd releases the next upstream version.
What do you mean by "automatically"?
There a
Le 06/03/2011 17:04, Eric Cooper a écrit :
>>> What's the best way to cherry-pick the fixes from SVN? I'd like to
>>> add them to debian/patches (preferably automatically), so that they
>>> can be easily dropped when Gerd releases the next upstream version.
>>
>> What do you mean by "automatically
Le 07/03/2011 03:20, Eric Cooper a écrit :
> [...]
> ocamlfind ocamlopt -package "unix pcre" -c netsys_impl_util.ml
> /tmp/camlasm44a107.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/camlasm44a107.s:581: Error: .size expression does not evaluate to a
> constant
> File "netsys_impl_util.ml", li
Package: libodn-ocaml
Version: 0.0.2-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Everything is said in subject... this bug probably belongs to
oasis2debian... feel free to reassign.
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (5
Le 07/03/2011 18:32, Eric Cooper a écrit :
> If the .owner files are needed and/or useful, then many -dev packages
> should include them that currently don't (possible MBF?),
> and the few runtime libraries that currently have them shouldn't.
The .owner files are there to keep track of the package
Subject: ocamlopt broken by binutils 2.21
Package: ocaml
Severity: grave
Version: 3.11.2-2
Tags: wheezy sid
Le 08/03/2011 14:00, Eric Cooper a écrit :
I was able to fix this problem; a patch is attached to the issue report in
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5237
I only did a full
Le 09/03/2011 01:08, Eric Cooper a écrit :
> The i386 patch from spiralvoice is not quite right -- it needs a
> begin/end around the match expression, otherwise the float constants
> only get emitted in the "| _ ->" branch.
Indeed. I am building a new version of the package (on i386, this time
:)
Le 09/03/2011 01:14, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
> Since recently, Scilab build process has been failing on the following
> commands in a unstable chroot: [...]
This is due to a new behaviour of binutils 2.21. See this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2011/03/msg00044.html
This
Le 10/03/2011 09:17, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
>> Now that Squeeze is released, we can actively work on getting OCaml
>> 3.12.0 into Debian... I've updated the coordination wiki page [1].
>
> That was one month ago ... Any idea when this transition is going to happen?
After #613848 is done.
Cheers
Le 11/03/2011 05:43, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> noticed “thanks” to a buildd glitch (g++ missing):
> | /usr/bin/ocamlc -c soundtouch.mli
> | /usr/bin/ocamlc -c soundtouch.ml
> | ocamlmklib -L/usr/lib \
> | -o soundtouch_stubs soundtouch_stubs.o
> -lSoundTou
Dear Eric and Romain (and everyone else involved in maintenance of OCaml
packages),
Would you please stop uploading packages that are involved in the
ongoing transition of OCaml libraries? The current one will never finish
if you keep uploading new packages.
Eric, could you cancel your delayed up
Le 12/03/2011 15:21, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Eric, could you cancel your delayed upload of approx?
I've done it myself.
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Hello,
I would like to apply to the ocaml package in Debian the patch I
submitted at [1], even though it has been rejected upstream.
I still agree that -custom should be avoided when possible... but
contrarily to Xavier, I don't think it is always possible *and relevant*
in practice. I'm thi
Le 15/03/2011 17:58, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I would like to apply to the ocaml package in Debian the patch I
submitted at [1], even though it has been rejected upstream.
Patch looks sensible, but I'm curious, I can't find why it was
rejected upstream. From a Fedora POV we'd much prefer s
Le 16/03/2011 17:20, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit :
> I'm sorry, but I need to reject your package, as you missed some copyright
> holders and licenses in your copyright file. You're missing at least
> examples/{minesweeper,boulderdash,sudoku}. I didn't check for more.
I agree for minesweepe
Le 12/03/2011 18:37, Michael Tautschnig a écrit :
> As I'd be interested in getting a package into Debian that would at least
> suggest Cil I was wondering whether you had already been successful in
> packaging
> Cil.
I've pushed a preliminary packaging to:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-ocaml-m
Package: otags
Version: 3.09.3.3-1~11
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
Hello,
I've just noticed that otags FTBFSes since the recent upgrade of camlp5:
> Configuration summary:
> binaries will be copied to /usr/bin
> libraries will be copied to /usr/lib/ocaml/otags/
> native-cod
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
The Debian OCaml team is ready for a transition to OCaml 3.12.0. All
packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.11.2 and ocaml-base-3.11.2 will
be affected.
I am waiting for the appr
reopen 619344
retitle 619344 Not ready for multiarchified libx11-dev
thanks
Le 23/03/2011 01:54, Artur Rona a écrit :
> I was trying to build ocaml 3.11.2-4 on Ubuntu natty, but it fails to
> build. I don't know how to fix it.
> [...]
> X11 not found, the "graph" library will not be supported.
> [
severity 620031 important
tags 620031 + confirmed
thanks
Le 29/03/2011 13:06, Torsten Crass a écrit :
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
unison-gtk still works when no terminal interaction is involved (e.g.
when you use an agent).
After a recent upgrade, unison-gtk cea
Le 23/03/2011 21:02, Steve Langasek a écrit :
[...] But it does fix the
problem, though it can't really be applied to ocaml until dpkg 1.16.0 is
uploaded to Debian.
Does it really matter that /usr/lib/`dpkg-architecture
-qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH` is used? Wouldn't using something like `pkg-config
-
Le 10/04/2011 17:13, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> SSLv2 support got removed, but it seems you still try to use the
> functions. I suspect this is yet an other case of a wrapper of the
> openssl library. [...]
Indeed. Are SSLv23_* functions still OK to use?
> [...] You can check that those functions d
Le 16/04/2011 01:11, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
>>> The Debian OCaml team is ready for a transition to OCaml 3.12.0. All
>>> packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.11.2 and ocaml-base-3.11.2 will
>>> be affected.
>>> [...]
> Yeah, please go ahead!
Great! I will do another round on open bugs against dh
Le 16/04/2011 19:37, Eric Cooper a écrit :
>> [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce/OCamlTransitions
>
> I have a new upstream version of approx waiting to upload, so it
> need not be binNMU'd. But I couldn't figure out what I should add to
> [1] to indicate this.
I did it.
Cheers,
Le 17/04/2011 20:44, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
>> Great! I will do another round on open bugs against dh-ocaml and ocaml,
>> and upload them soon, then wait for the new ocaml to be available on all
>> architectures, then schedule the binNMUs.
Mehdi has set up a monitoring page [1], and I've updated [
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:46:28 +0200
Source: ocurl
Binary: libcurl-ocaml-dev libcurl-ocaml
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu
Maintainers
Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu
Description:
coq- proof assistant for higher-order logic (toplevel and compiler)
coq-theories - proof assistant for higher-order logic (theories)
coqide - proof assistant for higher-order logic (gtk interface)
libcoq-ocaml - runtime libraries for Coq
Le 27/04/2011 21:09, Eric Cooper a écrit :
> Suppose a program compiles with any version of OCaml since oldstable,
> i.e., doesn't use any newer features of the language. Is there any
> reason for its debian/control file to use a versioned build-dependency
> on ocaml-nox?
I don't see any. I tend
Le 27/04/2011 22:02, Eric Cooper a écrit :
>> Do you have a specific example in mind? It already happened in the past
>> that versioned build-dependency were "artificially" added to ease some
>> transitions...
>
> I was just updating approx's debian/control file before I upload it.
Please, wait f
Le 01/05/2011 13:37, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> [...] I was
> wondering if any of the DD behind Ocaml could:
>
> - point me to Ocaml library packaging howtos
http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.html/index.html
> - volunteer for co-maintainance of these packages
I'm n
Le 17/05/2011 23:33, Stephen McCamant a écrit :
> [...] another suitable workaround from our
> perspective would be if there was a way to disable the
> new "-output-obj"-style behavior.
The previous behaviour was compiling a runtime (as with -make-runtime),
a pure bytecode using this runtime (as w
Le 24/05/2011 04:04, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> Basically, we want optional plugins, e.g. liquidsoap-plugins-sdl,
> which depends only on the corresponding C libraries, in this case the
> libsdl, but no ocaml module. [...]
The error message is legitimate in this case. Actually, this specific
case
clone 627132 -1
retitle -1 Sys.executable_name is not set properly by caml_startup_code
severity -1 important
thanks
Le 20/05/2011 03:11, Stephen McCamant a écrit :
I haven't checked the source code for this, but my first guess is that
the program might be trying to find its own executable by lo
clone 627132 -1
retitle -1 provide a way to use legacy custom linking
thanks
Le 17/05/2011 23:33, Stephen McCamant a écrit :
The "strip"ping problem that appeared to motivate the new embedding
process had never bothered us, so another suitable workaround from our
perspective would be if there wa
Le 24/05/2011 16:31, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
Hmm.. You mean build a cmxs for sdl at build-time? First, this would
give the same error and it would also increase the complexity of the
dynamic loading, in order to resolve dependencies etc..
I meant building sdl.cmxs in ocaml-sdl package. It's qu
tags 582957 + moreinfo
thanks
Le 24/05/2010 23:15, Christophe Troestler a écrit :
> When using the caml-mode emacs reports that
>
> Warning: `next-line' used from Lisp code
> That command is designed for interactive use only
>
> It is quite annoying (the warning splits the window and prevent
Le 28/05/2011 06:54, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
>> I meant building sdl.cmxs in ocaml-sdl package. It's quite easy and can be
>> done in debian/rules. Have a look at postgresql-ocaml, for example. Then the
>> META, *.cmxs and *.cma should be moved to the runtime package. dh_ocaml
>> should then infer
Le 22/06/2011 22:27, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
>> I'd like to upload an updated dh_ocaml package soon, so as to fix
>> the experimental liquidsoap package. Let me know if this ok for the
>> team.
>>
>
> We don't have any major transition going on, so I don't see why we
> should hold back this upload.
Le 26/06/2011 07:34, Ian Zimmerman a écrit :
> The problem is that the dependency on libev-dev is not versioned. I had
> both libev3 and libev4 installed, plus libev-dev 3.x.
It depends on the libev it was compiled with. It's unfortunate that you
can have both libev4 and libev-dev 3.x installed a
Package: src:bin-prot
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
The latest version of bin-prot fails to build from source on almost
all architectures. Besides, there is a known issue with OCaml 3.12.1
[1]. I've notified upstream; they are investigating...
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.
Le 27/06/2011 21:09, Samuel Mimram a écrit :
> It would be nice if the package could be updated to 4.0.1 (I know it's lame
> for
> a "member" of the team to ask this but I really don't have time right now...).
[For Jun and Pierre: Samuel is asking for an update of the Debian
package of camlimages
Le 30/06/2011 21:51, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
dom-new-git-repo has been broken since the recent
alioth migration:
14:48 toots@leonard ~/sources/svn/debian% dom-new-git-repo ocaml-mm
I: initialize (empty) remote repository on alioth.d.o
Warning: the RSA host key for 'alioth.debian.org' differs fr
Le 24/04/2011 15:47, Eric Cooper a écrit :
>> Forgot to mention that uploading a new ocamlnet package means recompiling
>> its reverse dependencies, which are already ready with respect to OCaml and
>> OCamlnet. So, I'd rather prefer to wait the transition to finish. Then,
>> we could upload OCamln
Le 06/07/2011 16:25, Eric Cooper a écrit :
> ocamlnet3 is not "plug-compatible" with ocamlnet2. Most programs will
> need small changes in their build scripts to deal with slightly
> different include and lib paths. [...]
I've recompiled all OCaml-related packages with some updates (most
notably,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
OCaml 3.12.1 has been recently released. It is mostly bugfixes. I've
rebuilt all packages that depend on ocaml, and I see no blocker to
update it in Debian. I've planified the mig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 21:22:36 +0200
Source: cduce
Binary: cduce
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.5.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Changed-By: Stéphane Glondu
Description:
cduce
Le 13/07/2011 21:48, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
> Should *.cmxs files (native plugins for dynamic loading) go into the
> libxxx-ocaml or into libxxx-ocaml-dev package? I haved never used them
> myself for my projects but, as far as I understand, they may be necessary
> just to execute a certain binary.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stéphane Glondu"
* Package name: tyxml
Version : 1.91
Upstream Author : Thorsten Ohl, Vincent Balat, and others
* URL : http://ocsigen.org/tyxml/install
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
D
Le 19/07/2011 10:31, Giorgio Marinelli a écrit :
New upstream version is available: 3.12.1
We are waiting for a slot from the release team, see [1]. If you need
it, there are unofficial packages available at [2].
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633304
[2] http://ocaml.de
Hello,
I am planning to upload ocamlnet 3.3.5 to unstable as soon as ocsigen
1.3.4-2 migrates to testing (unless there is a build failure in
experimental, but things look pretty good so far [1]). A few reverse
dependencies need fixing [2], and all of them are fixed in git, except
approx, for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stéphane Glondu"
* Package name: ocaml-config-file
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Maxence Guesdon
* URL : http://config-file.forge.ocamlcore.org/
* License : LGPL-2+
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description
tags 615991 + moreinfo
thanks
ygrek wrote:
> src/netstring/doc/INSTALL.xml describes different ways how netstring.cma
> can be linked (alas not fully correct, but still). It should be
> installed with -dev or -doc package.
Is this still relevant with ocamlnet 3.3.5?
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--
Hello,
I've recently uploaded many packages that needed update. For packages I
don't especially care about, I make the updates "Team uploads" and don't
spend much time on them. This gives the illusion that the packages are
well maintained [0], but they definitely need more care.
At least Stefano
Package: src:liquidsoap
Version: 1.0.0~beta2.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
Your package fails to build with ocamlnet 3.3.5 on bytecode
architectures (and armel):
Relevant part:
> E: Error: unit Netsys_pollset_win32 exported in liquidsoap-plugin-lastfm but
> already exported by libocamlnet
tags 635326 + patch
thanks
Le 25/07/2011 09:41, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Your package fails to build with ocamlnet 3.3.5 on bytecode
> architectures (and armel):
>
> Relevant part:
>> E: Error: unit Netsys_pollset_win32 exported in liquidsoap-plugin-lastfm but
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Stéphane Glondu"
* Package name: lablgtk-extras
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Maxence Guesdon
* URL : http://gtk-extras.forge.ocamlcore.org/
* License : LGPL-2+
Programming Lang: OCaml
D
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hello,
Currently, galax has no human maintainers. It is maintained by the
Debian OCaml team because of the need of transition coordination, but
needs more love and a dedicated maintainer.
A potential maintainer should get familiar with [1], and in particular
with o
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hello,
Currently, pxp has no human maintainers. It is maintained by the
Debian OCaml team because of the need of transition coordination, but
needs more love and a dedicated maintainer.
A potential maintainer should get familiar with [1], and in particular
with our
Package: src:ocaml-batteries
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: important
Hello,
Your package fails to build with camomile 0.8.3-1 (available in
experimental).
Relevant part of the log:
> ocamlfind ocamlc -c -package camomile,num,str -I src -I libs -I testsuite -I
> libs/estring -I build/optcomp -I src
Package: src:galax
Version: 1.1-8
Severity: important
Hello,
Your package fails to build with camomile 0.8.3-1 (available in
experimental).
Relevant part of the log:
> /usr/bin/ocamlc -w m -I . -I . -I /usr/bin/../lib/ocaml -I
> /usr/lib/ocaml/pcre -I /usr/lib/ocaml/netstring -I /usr/lib/ocaml
Package: src:ocaml-gettext
Version: 0.3.3-1
Severity: important
Hello,
Your package fails to build with camomile 0.8.3-1 (available in
experimental).
Relevant part of the log:
> make[2]: Entering directory
> `/tmp/ocaml-gettext-0.3.3/libgettext-camomile-ocaml'
> ocamlfind ocamlc -package "get
Le 31/07/2011 21:55, Hilko Bengen a écrit :
> [...] (I
> have just uploaded libguestfs and various bindings to experimental.)
AFAICT, the upstream/1.10.5 tag is missing from the git repository (I
assume you are using git-buildpackage?), and the pristine-tar branch is
not up-to-date.
Also: libgues
Le 02/08/2011 11:39, Hilko Bengen a écrit :
> It compiles with camomile 0.8, but not with 0.7. Are there any plans to
> move the newer camomile package to unstable soon?
It won't happen before the current ocamlnet cluster [1] (ocamlnet and
camomile are entangled via galax) migrates to testing. Bes
tags 524908 + moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:46:03 +0200, Oto Havle wrote:
> OCaml programs which create Cairo surfaces via Cairo_bigarray leak memory.
> Following test program reproduces the bug. The program allocates many
> 100Mb arrays, but explicit garbage collector invocation should k
tags 524908 - moreinfo
tags 524908 + confirmed
found 524908 1:1.2.0-2
thanks
Le 02/08/2011 21:52, Oto Havle a écrit :
> [...] Note that I have 32-bit system.
I didn't take this into account, and I can indeed reproduce the bug in
an up-to-date i386 sid chroot, with version 1:1.2.0-2.
Cheers,
--
tags 524908 + help upstream
thanks
Le 03/08/2011 08:22, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
[...] Note that I have 32-bit system.
I didn't take this into account, and I can indeed reproduce the bug in
an up-to-date i386 sid chroot, with version 1:1.2.0-2.
By looking a bit deeper, I can observe
Le 27/11/2007 18:05, Thomas Fischbacher a écrit :
http://nmag.soton.ac.uk/tf/pycaml.html
This link is broken.
(Note ad Debian developers: this fixes some major memory management bugs
that can cause crashes in the original pycaml module which is in Debian,
so, ideally, our variant should event
Le 04/04/2011 17:16, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
It should be related to the fact that they don't ship runtime packages
(pure ocaml packages). However, the runtime package of liboasis-ocaml
contains *.cma libraries that really need the libraries provided by
libocamlgraph-ocaml-dev and libfileutils-
Le 08/08/2011 21:59, Anders Peter Fugmann a écrit :
> Apache fails to start with the follwing errors:
> [...]
Is this new with 3.3.5-3 ? Can you provide a minimal apache
configuration snippet that triggers this error?
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ.
tags 637147 + upstream
thanks
Le 09/08/2011 22:39, Anders Peter Fugmann a écrit :
> I replaced apache2.conf with this:
>
> LoadModule netcgi_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_netcgi_apache.so
> NetcgiLoad pcre/pcre.cma
> NetcgiLoad netsys/netsys.cma
> #NetcgiLoad netstring/netstring.cma
> #Netc
Le 10/08/2011 10:00, Anders Fugmann a écrit :
That solves the problem.
Great.
May I suggest that the file /etc/apache2/mods-available/netcgi_apache.load
provides by the debian package is updated to reflect this.
Sure. Done in git.
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-ma
Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-15
Severity: normal
Hello,
The test suite of ocaml-extunix 0.0.3-1 fails on armel because the
following program:
#include
int main() {
void *buffer[100];
return backtrace(buffer, 100);
}
returns 0. It returns with a non-zero status (3 everywhere I've
Le 15/09/2010 22:17, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
> Your best option right now, is to create a patch that adds the feature
> you need (i.e. "the new output_strings functionality"). And submit it to
> the BTS of the extlib project.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/ocaml-extlib/issues/list
What the status
Le 16/08/2011 16:22, Gerd Stolpmann a écrit :
I've chosen a more radical approach for a permanent resolution: The next
version of Ocamlnet will support the additional directive NetcgiRequire.
It works like "#require" in a findlib-enabled toploop. All the
NetcgiLoad directives can then be replaced
Le 23/08/2011 22:35, Hilko Bengen a écrit :
The OCaml part of febootstrap does not build on architectures without a
native code compiler:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=febootstrap&arch=mips&ver=3.8-1&stamp=1314125941
Apparently, OCAMLBEST has been set to "byte" by the AC_PROG_O
Le 31/08/2011 17:31, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> I have set debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org as Cc: to this email, in
> the hope that the Debian OCaml task force can have a last look on my
> work. I'd appreciate comments, and I hope I didn't do mistakes this
> time. Please keep in mind that I don
Le 09/07/2011 13:35, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> OCaml 3.12.1 has been recently released. It is mostly bugfixes. I've
> rebuilt all packages that depend on ocaml, and I see no blocker to
> update it in Debian. I've planified the migration at [1] (I am
> planning to update a
On 09/07/2011 05:51 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>> OCaml 3.12.1 has been recently released. It is mostly bugfixes. I've
>> rebuilt all packages that depend on ocaml, and I see no blocker to
>> update it in Debian. I've planified the migration at [1] (I am
>> plann
tags 642706 + unreproducible
thanks
Le 24/09/2011 19:53, Mònica Ramírez Arceda a écrit :
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
> [...]
I cannot reproduce this. Can anyone else?
Cheers,
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint
Le 25/09/2011 00:00, Eric Cooper a écrit :
> I get the same error. Here's what I did to reproduce it.
>
> $ apt-get source libbin-prot-camlp4-dev
> $ cd bin-prot-1.3.1/
> $ DIST=sid ARCH=amd64 git-pbuilder update
> $ pdebuild --pbuilder cowbuilder -- --basepath
> /var/cache/pbuilder/base-sid-amd
tags 642706 - unreproducible
thanks
Le 25/09/2011 15:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>> I get the same error. Here's what I did to reproduce it.
>>
>> $ apt-get source libbin-prot-camlp4-dev
>> $ cd bin-prot-1.3.1/
>> $ DIST=sid ARCH=amd64 git-pbuilder update
g
--- dash-0.5.7/debian/changelog
+++ dash-0.5.7/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+dash (0.5.7-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Revert http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.dash/556
+
+ -- Stéphane Glondu Sun, 25 Sep 2011 19:05:10 +0200
+
dash (0.5.7-1) uns
block 642835 by 642922
block 642706 by 642922
severity 642922 serious
thanks
Le 25/09/2011 19:28, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Bugs #642706 (bin-prot FTBFS) and #642835 (sexplib310 FTBFS) can be
> fixed by reverting the patch submitted at [1]. I don't understand why.
&g
tags 642935 + pending
thanks
Le 25/09/2011 21:19, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
> + [ Jonathan Nieder ]
> + * debian/control: add Breaks against versions of dh-ocaml that
> +relied on the ocaml{dumpapprox,plugininfo,byteinfo} tools.
> [...]
> Breaks:
> + dh-ocaml (<< 1.0.0),
> ocaml-interp (<
reassign 642730 src:ocaml-http
severity 642730 important
affects 642730 src:matita
retitle 642730 ocaml-http: should use dh-ocaml 0.9
thanks
Le 24/09/2011 21:32, Mònica Ramírez Arceda a écrit :
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> amd64.
> [...]
>> Error: Fi
801 - 900 of 2272 matches
Mail list logo
